An argument that doesn't consider the audience, the objection, the persuasiveness, OR the logic.
Quite a spectacle of piss poor propaganda. "If you're uncomfortable with our experimental mad science injection, just think about how it's similar to bloodsucking parasite-laden insects."
In this case, various parasitic species, and species that use injectable defense systems against their predators.
Second fallacy here is the strawman fallacy, that we are objecting to the shot because of its delivery method via syringe.
The response should not fall into the trap, first the wording of the poor response should be "is synthetic mrna natural?"
But the better response is one which highlights the fallacy of equating the natural with the good, and the absurdity of equating those who object to shot on the strongest basis, to those who object on the weakest basis.
Yes, typically the mRNA is transcribed from DNA in the nucleus of a cell and given the 7-methylguanosine cap to the 5' end and it has a polyadenylated tail on the 3' end.
I'm not sure what the delivery system is to get the foreign mRNA to be taken up by the cells but I recall people like Roger Tsien were working with delivery systems to target specific cells in the case of reporter tagging with the GFP he isolated so it isn't that far fetched.
Cooked in a lab. Packaged in artificial objects. Delivered with vehicles. Enforced by man made rules. What you think this isnt natural? Im going to focus on one word semantics and completely ignore everything about your intended meaning.
Native mRNA is natural and necessary for the normal processes of life, but details matter when discussing this pharmaceutical poison:
Just as no one should want to be infected with “naturally occurring” Lyme disease or malaria, no one should want to be injected with a synthetic and externally modified non-native mRNA, because that is completely unnatural and detrimental to the normal processes of life
[ + ] SaneGoatiSwear
[ - ] SaneGoatiSwear 8 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 06:53:24 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] kishind
[ - ] kishind 7 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 07:39:42 ago (+7/-0)
Quite a spectacle of piss poor propaganda. "If you're uncomfortable with our experimental mad science injection, just think about how it's similar to bloodsucking parasite-laden insects."
This guy has no idea how the human mind works.
[ + ] SilentByAssociation
[ - ] SilentByAssociation 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 09:33:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 7 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 08:33:21 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 6 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 07:13:00 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 3 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 05:13:34 ago (+3/-0)
Most natural things are, in fact, bad for you.
In this case, various parasitic species, and species that use injectable defense systems against their predators.
Second fallacy here is the strawman fallacy, that we are objecting to the shot because of its delivery method via syringe.
The response should not fall into the trap, first the wording of the poor response should be "is synthetic mrna natural?"
But the better response is one which highlights the fallacy of equating the natural with the good, and the absurdity of equating those who object to shot on the strongest basis, to those who object on the weakest basis.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 3 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 06:52:56 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 3 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 07:01:17 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 14:43:43 ago (+0/-0)
I'm not sure what the delivery system is to get the foreign mRNA to be taken up by the cells but I recall people like Roger Tsien were working with delivery systems to target specific cells in the case of reporter tagging with the GFP he isolated so it isn't that far fetched.
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 3 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 08:20:31 ago (+3/-0)
What you think this isnt natural? Im going to focus on one word semantics and completely ignore everything about your intended meaning.
Is that a jew?
[ + ] Battlefat
[ - ] Battlefat 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 05:05:10 ago (+2/-0)
Native mRNA is natural and necessary for the normal processes of life, but details matter when discussing this pharmaceutical poison:
Just as no one should want to be infected with “naturally occurring” Lyme disease or malaria, no one should want to be injected with a synthetic and externally modified non-native mRNA, because that is completely unnatural and detrimental to the normal processes of life
[ + ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior
[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 04:13:25 ago (+1/-0)
Every streetlight needs to be decorated with the dangling corpses of these fuckers.
[ + ] allahead
[ - ] allahead 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 16:17:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NeoNazirite
[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 06:47:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 06:49:56 ago (+1/-0)
Not that retarded considering the facetious statement preceding it.
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 08:23:31 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 1, 2021 08:56:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 1, 2021 09:16:58 ago (+0/-0)
Not so natural though, that anything on the planet injects something else with mRNA, especially synthetically engineered mRNA.