The loss of a US Navy ship to a massive blaze was “a completely avoidable catastrophe,” but management lapses on multiple levels, including the failure to activate a firefighting system, made the task impossible, a report claims.
Some three dozen officers aboard the USS ‘Bonhomme Richard’ were named as responsible for the loss of the ship, which caught fire near a San Diego naval base in July 2020, according to a 400-page investigation report obtained by the Associated Press on Tuesday. While one particular sailor, Seaman Apprentice Ryan Mays, was charged earlier this year for initially starting the conflagration, the report alleges that the vessel could still have been salvaged if not for the commanders and the crew’s lack of basic training and skills.
“Although the fire was started by an act of arson, the ship was lost due to an inability to extinguish the fire,” the report said, as quoted by the AP. It concluded that “repeated failures” by an “inadequately prepared crew” led to an “ineffective fire response.”
The report, prepared by Vice Admiral Scott Conn, outlined major lapses in training and preparedness, poor communication and coordination between personnel, bad equipment maintenance and broader breakdowns in the overall command-and-control structure on the vessel.
For instance, the investigators found that while the ship was fitted with a firefighting foam system that could have slowed the spread of the fire, no one on board was aware of how to put the system into operation, that is to push a certain button.
“No member of the crew interviewed considered this action or had specific knowledge as to the location of the button or its function,” the report said. Even if the sailors had prior knowledge of the intricate mechanism, it’s not clear if they succeeded in stopping the flames. The report claims that about 87% of all fire stations on board were plagued by equipment issues or had not been inspected at all.
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 7 points 3.5 yearsOct 20, 2021 16:59:18 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] JudyStroyer
[ - ] JudyStroyer 2 points 3.5 yearsOct 20, 2021 18:33:51 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 1 point 3.5 yearsOct 20, 2021 15:56:50 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 3 points 3.5 yearsOct 20, 2021 17:05:32 ago (+3/-0)
There isn't one single "globalist" organization that isn't pro Chinese communist. There isn't one single CEO of a globalist company that isn't salivating for a billion customers in china, no matter what.
They should have all been slaughtered in about 1980
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 0 points 3.5 yearsOct 20, 2021 17:44:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AttilaHitler
[ - ] AttilaHitler 0 points 3.5 yearsOct 21, 2021 00:39:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.5 yearsOct 20, 2021 19:54:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] KCobain27
[ - ] KCobain27 0 points 3.5 yearsOct 20, 2021 19:46:24 ago (+0/-0)