Sign into an existing account

Did you do it ?

Pictures were faked, including the most iconic one. While the landings did occur, the spin doctors had to justify the budget with fake bread and circuses. Some "legit" NASA photos have been argued by premier world-class photographers in fashion magazines as being absolutely done on a set.

"Or the fact that hundreds of thousands of employees from space exploration companies around the world have never leaked any evidence of it being faked."

The Gulf of Tonkin used to justify the Vietnam War is now established fact as fake. Don't try the "too many people" bullshit argument.

9/11 absolutely had Israel involvement, but that is still buried.

E: Hell, some goons took some photos to the main guy of the company that supplied all of the cameras for at least some of the Apollo missions and asked him to explain some visual problems. His response? He stared at them for a few moments, then said something like, "You'll have to ask NASA about that."

E2: This is the most iconic photo:

https://www.futurity.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/moon-landing1_1600.jpg

It is fake or modified. When you are in a field of grass on Earth, the distant field does not dim. Nothing is different about the sun on the moon. There is a term for this that I cannot remember, but it means this was taken on a set or it was post-production modified. Either case, deception is going on.

E3: Also, due to weight concerns, no giant light sources were taken with any mission. This you can validate with NASA.

Now if we find out that all Apollo astronauts were Jews then that would be different

I used to agree with you until I realized that 9/11 was completely faked and there weren't even any planes.

I think the unmanned rover missions happen. But the photography from Apollo has no evidence of radiation exposure which is impossible. Put that aside and just look at the studio lighting immediately recognized by all of the famous European fashion photographers of the past 30 years:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=KpuKu3F0BvY

The photography gave away their hoax. They may have been launched into space and gone to the moon but the photography they claim is from the moon was done in a studio. None of the lighting is even (to the horizon) because you can't ideally replicate the sun in a studio. This is never addressed in any of the debunking videos.

"All crewed space stations to date have been within LEO. From 1968 to 1972, the Apollo program's lunar missions sent humans beyond LEO. Since the end of the Apollo program, no human spaceflights have been beyond LEO. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Earth_orbit
/s
E: Low earth orbit is 2000km, the moon is away about 385000km.

deleted

All of them have that same angry response though. At least one of them would have been like "sure, if it means proving to you, this is no problem at all!".