☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
21

Anti-Mandate : They wouldn't rush it if it was legal

submitted by patchCodeUnsuccessful to whatever 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 12:02:42 ago (+21/-0)     (whatever)

Osha regulations usually require a period for feedback from the public. The reason they're rushing this mandate is because it will not hold up in court. The only way that you can even bring this in as an emergency measure is if there's a high possibility of harm.

So far, global probability of death from the coof (at high estimates) is 0.15% chance. Death by car accident in the US (over the full lifetime) is 0.934% chance. Death by coof in a year is approximately equivalent to death by drowning.

This of course is for everybody. Death by coof for working age adults in the US is sitting around 0.02%
This is not enough of a danger to force people to take the jab.

So, they're forcing it through fast so that it has an effect before it gets kicked out in court.

Fuck Biden!


8 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 7 points 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 12:45:59 ago (+7/-0)

Court? Since when does that matter?

[ - ] rage 2 points 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 18:49:44 ago (+2/-0)

Courts mattered when we still had the balls to hang corrupt jewdicary faggots.

[ - ] deleted 3 points 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 12:35:29 ago (+3/-0)

deleted

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 2 points 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 15:51:56 ago (+2/-0)

especially with the oft forgotten fact that chimpanzees are now banned from being experimented on and all captive chimps were ordered released to carers by 2015?

ya think maybe big pharma might be punishing humans because they cant do shit to something thats 99% genetically human?

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 2 points 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 15:50:21 ago (+2/-0)

"Well we are now at 100% jabbed so its moot"

judges everywhere.

[ - ] patchCodeUnsuccessful [op] 1 point 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 15:57:37 ago (+1/-0)

Federal judges are exempt. They may or may not be jabbed, but they retain the right to choose.

[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 2 points 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 17:11:33 ago (+2/-0)

EXACTLY who is being "protected" here? Fags? (Immuno-compromised)

[ - ] patchCodeUnsuccessful [op] 1 point 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 17:29:20 ago (+1/-0)

I actually hadn't thought of that. But, yeah they are the "at risk" and also have the highest amount of political power in the DEM camp.

[ - ] Version6 1 point 3.5 yearsNov 4, 2021 17:43:56 ago (+1/-0)

They have to prove that exposure likely leads to death. It will never pass that threshold.