[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022] Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.
The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top secret shared drive.
I don't know specifically about fauxi, but most govt workers carry over year after year, no matter who gets elected. since fauxi has been sucking at the govt teat for decades, it is fair to assume that he has held his position for a long time.
Fauci has been around for decades at the head of infectious diseases at the NIH. There are people that hate his guts for the way he handled AIDS back in the 1980s. It's been widely reported that he's the highest paid official in all of government. Trump (probably not personally) put him at the head of the White House task force for Covid-19.
The problem is softened language. While the term "gain of function" is an actual one, it's highly technical, and I wonder if it wasn't deliberately used (and barely defined) in order to provide more of a controlled oppo angle.
So far I've talked to two of my normie friends about this. In both cases it went along these lines:
"Yeah, the latest Project Veritas thing just came out. DARPA was approached about gain of function for the kung flu virus." "Oh." "You have no idea what 'gain of function' is do you." "No." "Then why didn't you ask?" "I assume it's something bad." "It's when you study a virus with the intent of making it easier to transmit or spread." "WHOA THAT'S FUCKED UP WOW HOLY SHIT"
I imagine it will be the same for most of you as well.
[ + ] GeneralDisarray
[ - ] GeneralDisarray 1 point 3.3 yearsJan 11, 2022 16:56:20 ago (+1/-0)
Trump could have stopped this in its tracks. But he let them poison the kids.
He is not on our side. Fuck that orange cunt!!!!
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 3.3 yearsJan 11, 2022 10:06:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 2 points 3.3 yearsJan 11, 2022 12:50:57 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 2 points 3.3 yearsJan 11, 2022 14:07:06 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] CRKT_M16Z
[ - ] CRKT_M16Z 0 points 3.3 yearsJan 11, 2022 14:35:19 ago (+0/-0)
And because he is a tool of the democrats, nothing will happen to him.
[ + ] Artificial_Intelligentile
[ - ] Artificial_Intelligentile 0 points 3.3 yearsJan 11, 2022 11:05:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Splooge
[ - ] Splooge 2 points 3.3 yearsJan 11, 2022 13:52:27 ago (+2/-0)
The problem is softened language. While the term "gain of function" is an actual one, it's highly technical, and I wonder if it wasn't deliberately used (and barely defined) in order to provide more of a controlled oppo angle.
So far I've talked to two of my normie friends about this. In both cases it went along these lines:
"Yeah, the latest Project Veritas thing just came out. DARPA was approached about gain of function for the kung flu virus."
"Oh."
"You have no idea what 'gain of function' is do you."
"No."
"Then why didn't you ask?"
"I assume it's something bad."
"It's when you study a virus with the intent of making it easier to transmit or spread."
"WHOA THAT'S FUCKED UP WOW HOLY SHIT"
I imagine it will be the same for most of you as well.