So I'm pretty sure this is a video that was completely assembled and created by an AI bot. As we all know AI bots can create full articles now about subjects but they always give themselves away by sort of rambling through various subjects and assembling facts about those various subjects together in a way that a human would not do. A human typically chooses one thing and makes it into an article and the focus of the article and it always brings it back to that idea in the article. But an AI will start talking about one thing and find a link from that thing to another thing and then they'll expand on the other thing and then they'll find a link from that thing to another thing and then they'll expand on that thing and they'll fill the words out with references to all these things and they'll be no overall thing that ties it all together. And that's exactly what's happening in this video. And they're using stock imaging which an AI could easily choose by just saying oh I'm writing about the reshot structure. Go Google search some images about restart structure and insert that image for 5 seconds and the resulting video. Furthermore automatic narration of compiled words is completely happening all the time now as you probably seen in many other videos. So I think actually what's happened here is an AI wrote a script. The AI then went out and created and used the standard hey eyes that turn words into spoken words. And then it went out and searched for images from Google or wherever which it inserted for a certain length of time into those appropriate scripted line errors areas rather and put this video together. And it's pretty certain that that's what's happened which is why when you watch this whole thing they're a bunch of interesting little subjects but after it's all done you just feel like you watched a bunch of scrambled eggs and there was no overall thing that you learned other than the Assembly of a lot of other pieces of other things that you'd probably seen before. Also it's suspect cuz it's almost exactly 10 minutes and 10 minutes is what YouTube wants your video to be in order for you to get credit and money for your video being viewed. Except for the new YouTube shorts thing your videos really have to be at least about 10 minutes for somebody to watch it and count as a full engagement on your video which gives you more money and get you up in the rankings. So you'll notice a lot of humans who are doing their own videos will stretch their video out through all kinds of b******* to create something that's at least 10 minutes long when the thing that they tease you with and the title they could tell you and actually two minutes. It's really unfortunate that that happens because YouTube used to be a lot better when they didn't have that 10 minute mark because you could see a lot of good videos that only lasted 2 to 3 minutes and they didn't have to Pat them. Which is one of the reasons Franklin whenever I see a video with an interesting title on it I skipped three quarters of the way through the video to get to the last 7 minute Mark of the video cuz that's when they're going to tell you the actual thing that they put in the title. anyway welcome to the world of AI you just got your time wasted by an AI who served you scrambled eggs with an automatic voice over an aeration and a bunch of stock footage inserted to make a 10-minute video.
By the way I use speech to text to narrate this so if it doesn't make sense then just sound it out.
Interesting, but I think the bit about atlantis was grasping at straws. It depends on an accurate description of the city surviving into plato's time, but it also proposes the city was far outside of the greek sphere of knowledge and far older than their knowledge of history.
There are much better candidates much closer to greece and much closer in time to plato. Also, he wasn't exactly known for the accuracy of his stories or personally confirming the things he wrote, so relying on his description being perfectly accurate seems a bit foolish.
That means very little. There's maps showing the garden of Eden, Huy Brazil and Ultima Thule. It was common practice for cartographers to add mythological details to their maps without any real evidence of their location.
Atlantis means the city of Atlas, a King. There was a King Atlas in that location.
Right, so the mythological island was named after the mythological king. There were mythological rulers all over the world (like Prestor John) who may or may not ever have existed.
I think even conspiracy theories should have to stand on their own two feet though. As much as the NWO would like it to mean "crazy wacky idea" it does have a meaning.
Atlantis, whale ancestors and niggies destroying North Africa through mega-fires.
Nonsense. That's the same kind of claptrap that blames the North American extinction of the megafauna on small numbers of migratory tribes from Siberia. It didn't happen because it can't happen.
It happened in Australia, where abos lit mega-fires larger than most of Western Europe combined concurrently, for 65K years. Resulting in the extinction of megafauna here, a complete change in flora and terrestrial ecology and turning a once ardent rain forest continent, into a mostly unhabitable desert wasteland.
They did this for 65,000 years? I seriously doubt that. Plus, there are real temperature and weather changes that occur naturally which have been graphed as Milankovitch cycles. They describe multiple series of temperature rising and falling corresponding with ice ages. As this occurs, wind and heat patterns changes, which affects the relative humidity and moisture over large areas of earth. North Africa was affected by the end of the last ice age, which occurred about 13,000 years ago, resulting in rising ocean levels, receding ice levels, and the entire climate of North Africa becoming arid and windy. Humans didn't do this.
It's impossible to say anything meaningful about Australia's climate 65,000 years ago because there is so little data. What little there is can only be used for conjecture. Likewise, any traces of the abos that long ago only gives us an idea of where they were when they died.
Australian archaeologists give abos much more credit than they deserve. I can't believe they sustained a behavior of lighting mega-fires for centuries, let alone millennia. Modern abos have an IQ of 70, and they've always been that way. I find it much credible that Australian archaeologists have interpreted slight bits of data in a way that suits them, which is what all archaeologists do.
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 12:17:51 ago (+1/-0)
We know abos were here 65K years ago, we know they were lighting mega-fires for at least that long.
It incomprehensible to say Australia's anything meaningful about Australia's climate 65,000 years ago because there is so little data.
Ancient weather patterns are assessed by geologists.
I can't believe they sustained a behavior of lighting mega-fires for centuries, let alone millennia. Modern abos have an IQ of 70, and they've always been that way.
Their claim to fame is lighting fires they couldnt control, ruining one of the worlds seven continents.
Ancient weather patterns are assessed by geologists.
I know. It's archaeologists who correlate disparate data, such as geological data, earth strata data, and human remains, and form a conjecture of what might have happened.
Their claim to fame is lighting fires they couldnt control, ruining one of the worlds seven continents.
It's one thing to claim it, it's another to prove it. Niggers claim they had and did everything before the White man took it from them, including building the pyramids and ruling Egypt, and there's no evidence of that either.
Besides, what would be the motive of abos starting and sustaining uncontrolled fires for millennia? They were hunter-gathers, and they would know they were destroying the food supply. Even for an incredibly stupid people, this makes no sense.
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 19, 2022 10:52:30 ago (+0/-0)
By the way I use speech to text to narrate this so if it doesn't make sense then just sound it out.
[ + ] OldGoat
[ - ] OldGoat 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 21:16:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] IfuckedYerMum
[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 18:46:32 ago (+0/-0)*
Seriously though, Atlantis was destroyed by a pole shift.
[ + ] mattsixteen24
[ - ] mattsixteen24 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 18:25:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood -2 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 14:54:16 ago (+0/-2)
Look up MudFossil on jewtube.
Geologist get destroyed by him every time.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 2 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 13:09:31 ago (+2/-0)
There are much better candidates much closer to greece and much closer in time to plato. Also, he wasn't exactly known for the accuracy of his stories or personally confirming the things he wrote, so relying on his description being perfectly accurate seems a bit foolish.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 13:33:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 13:48:13 ago (+1/-0)
That means very little. There's maps showing the garden of Eden, Huy Brazil and Ultima Thule. It was common practice for cartographers to add mythological details to their maps without any real evidence of their location.
Right, so the mythological island was named after the mythological king. There were mythological rulers all over the world (like Prestor John) who may or may not ever have existed.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 22:42:13 ago (+1/-0)
That's why its in conspiracy.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 3.1 yearsMar 21, 2022 07:43:17 ago (+1/-0)
I think even conspiracy theories should have to stand on their own two feet though. As much as the NWO would like it to mean "crazy wacky idea" it does have a meaning.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 11:51:12 ago (+2/-0)
Nonsense. That's the same kind of claptrap that blames the North American extinction of the megafauna on small numbers of migratory tribes from Siberia. It didn't happen because it can't happen.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 10 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 11:54:28 ago (+10/-0)
It happened in Australia, where abos lit mega-fires larger than most of Western Europe combined concurrently, for 65K years. Resulting in the extinction of megafauna here, a complete change in flora and terrestrial ecology and turning a once ardent rain forest continent, into a mostly unhabitable desert wasteland.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 5 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 12:10:16 ago (+5/-0)*
It's impossible to say anything meaningful about Australia's climate 65,000 years ago because there is so little data. What little there is can only be used for conjecture. Likewise, any traces of the abos that long ago only gives us an idea of where they were when they died.
Australian archaeologists give abos much more credit than they deserve. I can't believe they sustained a behavior of lighting mega-fires for centuries, let alone millennia. Modern abos have an IQ of 70, and they've always been that way. I find it much credible that Australian archaeologists have interpreted slight bits of data in a way that suits them, which is what all archaeologists do.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 3 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 13:23:35 ago (+3/-0)*
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 12:17:51 ago (+1/-0)
Ancient weather patterns are assessed by geologists.
Their claim to fame is lighting fires they couldnt control, ruining one of the worlds seven continents.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 13:02:34 ago (+2/-0)
I know. It's archaeologists who correlate disparate data, such as geological data, earth strata data, and human remains, and form a conjecture of what might have happened.
It's one thing to claim it, it's another to prove it. Niggers claim they had and did everything before the White man took it from them, including building the pyramids and ruling Egypt, and there's no evidence of that either.
Besides, what would be the motive of abos starting and sustaining uncontrolled fires for millennia? They were hunter-gathers, and they would know they were destroying the food supply. Even for an incredibly stupid people, this makes no sense.
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 12:58:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 22:41:35 ago (+1/-0)
Even still most rural fires happen due to a firebug, coon or Greens political party blocking SES backburning.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 20:24:15 ago (+1/-0)