'Previous research has linked soy to infertility. Researchers from The Harvard School of Public Health said plant oestrogens in foods such as tofu, soy mince or milk may interfere with hormonal signals which can lead to problems with sperm production.' - Upgoat

'Previous research has linked soy to infertility. Researchers from The Harvard School of Public Health said plant oestrogens in foods such as tofu, soy mince or milk may interfere with hormonal signals which can lead to problems with sperm production.'
submitted by Garrett to science 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 09:32:03 ago (+17/-0) (archive.ph)
https://archive.ph/jEdQx

esp this part:

'The "normal" sperm concentration for a man is between 80 and 120 million per millilitre, and the average of men who ate on average a portion of soy-based food every other day was 41 million fewer.'

11 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 15:19:37 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ + ] chrimony

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 16:49:19 ago (+1/-0)

Or maybe the people who eat soy are more likely to be low-T men. Or maybe Asians have evolved not to be affected by the soy. This is a correlation study, not a causation study.

But this was done 14 years ago, before Kl0wn W0rld. Now I wouldn't trust any science around soy. Seems best just to avoid it regardless.

[ + ] Garrett

[ - ] Garrett [op] 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 21:17:24 ago (+1/-0)

no phytoestrogens mimics estrogen. thats what the issue is. estrogen is feminizing. not really surprising therefore that asian men tend to produce less testosterone on avg

[ - ] Goatslayer -4 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 09:33:45 ago (+0/-4)

A BBC news article from 2008 isn't science, you fucking idiot. You're just pushing propaganda.

I'm thinking you people rely on archive links so that people can't point out your bullshit.

[ + ] Garrett

[ - ] Garrett [op] 4 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 09:35:25 ago (+4/-0)

it doesnt matter if its from 2008 as its objective. is the theory of gravity no longer relevant since its from hundreds of years ago?

also it quotes the harvard school of public health. i think at least for a normie thats pretty significant

[ + ] Khash1488

[ - ] Khash1488 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 09:51:23 ago (+2/-1)

The theory of gravity is hardly a proven fact, as much as jew academia would like it to be fact, it is not. There is no object found in nature, no matter the mass, that has been found to exhibit any power of gravity. The only object which have “gravity” are planets, which is near impossible to prove. Nothing else no matter how large has ever shown any ability to have a gravitational field or pull, not even in the slightest.

[ + ] chrimony

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 16:44:49 ago (+0/-0)

You don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

[ + ] Khash1488

[ - ] Khash1488 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 31, 2022 23:32:39 ago (+0/-0)

Well apparently the freemason scientists of the past didn’t know either. Because they assassinated and killed and lied and upheld these lies through force and control of media/academia. The celestial objects we see in the sky are much, much closer than these liars claim, just for starters. And this lie began all the way back in ancient Greece. Pythagoras is the grandfather of freemasonry. https://ericdubay.wordpress.com/2018/07/10/the-history-of-flat-earth/#comment-3247

[ + ] chrimony

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 3.2 yearsApr 1, 2022 01:38:15 ago (+0/-0)

You're retarded.

[ + ] natehiggers

[ - ] natehiggers 2 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 09:42:44 ago (+2/-0)

Say's the soyboi faggot

[ + ] chrimony

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 16:51:16 ago (+0/-0)

The jew loves soy.

Sign into an existing account