×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
42

Tuskegee University study shows that in all lynchings in the US from 1882 to 1968, there was a total of 4,743, of which 27% was White

submitted by HughBriss to whatever 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 12:57:14 ago (+42/-0)     (archive.tuskegee.edu)

http://archive.tuskegee.edu/repository/digital-collection/lynching-information/lynchings-stats-year-dates-causes/

Lynching in the South was a response to post-war Northern occupation, where jews overran the states and freed slaves were given unprecedented authority over Whites. These former slaves were often illiterate, and because niggers have a low impulse control and a much lower IQ than Whites, created a hellish environment for Whites. Lynching was often done to ensure someone a community knew was guilty from escaping justice. The Leo Frank case is an excellent example of that.


21 comments block


[ - ] lord_nougat 7 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:03:39 ago (+7/-0)

I'm 27% saddened by this.

But they probably mostly deserved it.

[ - ] HughBriss [op] 5 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:14:49 ago (+5/-0)

I forgot to point out that on the last page of that document, it shows the causes for the lynchings. 40% of them were due to homicide, and 19% were due to rape. 22% were due to "other causes", whatever that means, but most likely means "being an uppity, obnoxious, flouting-the-law nigger". It's interesting that in Iowa there were 21 lynchings, 19 of them being White men.

[ - ] lord_nougat 4 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:18:58 ago (+4/-0)

It's almost funny to remember how they taught us in school that this was due to savagery and bigotry, while now living in lawless times where subhuman criminals can do as they please with impunity lynching makes sense.

[ - ] Boardallday3 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 18:22:34 ago (+0/-0)

Probably whites were held to a higher standard as they should be.

[ - ] FalseRealityCheck 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:43:21 ago (+1/-0)

But on the bright side, 73% were shitskins! And of the 27%, how many got roped because of their 'dealings' with shitskins or were pedos?

[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:45:56 ago (+1/-0)

Most of them, most likely, as I said.

But they were White, and therefore some of them [the ones who were not pedos] deserved their due process.

[ - ] FalseRealityCheck 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:47:13 ago (+2/-0)

Some lynchings took place after due process when the humans thought the jew or nigger deserved citizen justice.

[ - ] HughBriss [op] 3 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:50:08 ago (+3/-0)

Correct. In most of the cases of White lynchings, they were acquitted or given very minimal punishments, which offended the community, who knew these men deserved much worse. They probably knew the men and considered them a blight on their community.

[ - ] deleted 5 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:16:56 ago (+5/-0)

deleted

[ - ] diggernicks -1 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:21:09 ago (+1/-2)

The kkk used to be pretty cool guys before weak traitorous bitches like David Duke joined

They understood catholics are enemies of america just as much as niggers

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 3 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 14:39:43 ago (+3/-0)

Every time I point this out someone mouth breather argues that they weren't found guilty in a court of law nor judged by their peers.

That is entirely untrue. A community has banded together after knowing extensive amounts of background and evidence without the interference of the *legal system" and has judged them worthy of hanging.

Lynching rarely happened and when it did it was because the community was so outraged that they demanded swift action that the justice system rarely gives.

You can read extensively about lynchings, the truth, and not what some nigger or some jew writer tells you. Lynching worked.

[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 15:38:38 ago (+2/-0)

The threat of lynching also kept politicians honest.

[ - ] HughBriss [op] 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 15:09:34 ago (+0/-0)

Well said.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 17:57:20 ago (+1/-0)

Thats like one year in south chicago.

[ - ] Boardallday3 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 20:16:31 ago (+0/-0)

At the very height of slavery in the U.S. only about 1% of Americans owned slaves. All of the Atlantic slave ships were owned by Jews. Over 80% of slave owning plantation owners in the U.S. were JEWISH.

[ - ] Hobama 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 15:56:04 ago (+0/-0)

Those are rookie numbers. Should have lynched at least 1000x more niggers

[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 14:21:35 ago (+0/-0)

AND they were almost ALL justified. EVEN legally.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 14:03:19 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] HughBriss [op] 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 14:23:49 ago (+1/-0)

Interesting. I'd never heard of this before. I found this in wikijewdia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_14%2C_1891_New_Orleans_lynchings

There was a large number of Sicilian immigrants coming to the United States, where they were seen as a different race from northern Italians, a distinction even the Italian government acknowledged. Sicilian immigrants were seen by Americans as criminals (most of those arrested and those lynched had criminal records, so this was accurate), and they were Catholic, and as papists they were seen as beholden to a foreign power and not the US government. Notwithstanding the old French families of New Orleans were Catholic, the new Americans living in Louisiana were protestants and by this time had reached an understanding with the French to cooperate. The Sicilians were seen as interlopers and outsiders.

Plus, the policeman involved wasn't just any old cop, it was police chief David Hennessey, who had stature in the community.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 30, 2022 18:03:37 ago (+1/-0)

Sicilians are pretty bad though. Bullshit was this about catholicism. It was about thugs and thieves.