Sorry for the link to Henry Makow, but the information is good. Millions of parents from 1947 to the late 60s learned how to raise their children from Dr Spock's book "Baby and Child Care". Among other things, he recommended parents to be permissive with their children. This created a sense of entitlement in their baby boomer children, who became the worst, most narcissistic generation of people in several centuries.
He also recommended having babies sleep on the stomachs rather than on their backs, creating a sudden rise in infant deaths due to asphyxiation (SIDS).
The article doesn't say Dr Spock was a jew (he was of Dutch ancestry, his forebears were previously named Spaak), but if he was from a Dutch family, there's a good chance they was some intermarrying with jews.
I'm not suggesting anyone should excuse boomers' narcissism, self-centeredness, and failure in raising their own children, but it should give you some insight as to why it happened. It should also give you some understanding how long jews have planned the destruction of White civilization and the lengths they have gone to do it.
I understand. A lot of people with boomer parents have told me the same thing. They've said they blame their grandparents for being too indulgent with their parents. Boomers grew up in a prosperous world their parents never knew and they took everything for granted, and their parents gave them everything they wanted. Boomers developed a sense of entitlement, even though most never really worked hard at whatever they achieved. When they wanted something, they just bellyached enough until someone gave it to them ... like they did with their parents.
Thank you. I'm getting a lot of pushback because it's being seen as a defense of boomers, which I clearly say it is not, only an explanation. I should mention that as a boomer, I generally despise my peers. I understand them, and since I'm from that generation, I want to give younger generations context to explain why they are that way. These things don't grow in a vacuum.
Spock was a Freudian nut, and Spock was buddies with James Rockefeller since college.
The Rockefellers were buddies with a guy named Holland Sacket Duell, a member of the New York Senate. Sackett was a partner in Duell, Sloan and Pierce, the first publishers of that freak Spock's book that told women to listen to their instincts. They can't tell the difference between instincts and emotions, so parenting became "mommy says he can have it because it makes mommy feel good.
The Rockefeller's hand is uncovered in the background of so much nasty shit, somebody should have assassinated the whole lot of them before the first world war,
The Tuskegee syphilis experiments were them with the initial funding.
The Alan Memorial nut house in Montreal was them, where they put Donald Ewan Cameron the even nuttier Freudian shrink who ran the MKUltra brainwashing experiments on patients for that sadistic jew Sidney Gottleib. They picked up Cameron at the Nuremburg trials where he was opining about how psychiatrists should be the ultimate authority in society and Germans should have to apply for a license to have kids because they were always going to be bad people.
The reviews for that idiot's book on Amazon are glowing retarded jews saying buy it, it's great.
He killed kids by causing sudden infant death syndrome and then he said they should all be vegan.
Holy cow, I wasn't aware of any of that, except that the Rockefeller family is evil. But I think your summary of his advice for women to listen to their instincts is right on the money. For centuries, families of all generations lived together, and mothers helped their daughters in child rearing, and daughters learned from the benefit of their mothers' experience.
It all changed post WWII, when young people started to move away from their parents, particularly war vets who were eligible to buy a home with their VA benefits. Because they weren't living together as a larger family, they turned to a popular book, written by a pediatrician with minimal child rearing experience who based his recommendations on opinion and observation rather than statistical evidence and previous generations of successful child rearing.
His book increased that isolation and consequent freak out in moms. He implied all the time that their own mother raised them wrong and that made them flawed and imperfect and all older women raised everyone wrong.
The psycho trick is in saying the opposite. "You can do it" raises the spectre of failure that may not have occurred to them. Now they "need" the book even more.
The psycho trick is in saying the opposite. "You can do it" raises the spectre of failure that may not have occurred to them. Now they "need" the book even more.
[ + ] MaryXmas
[ - ] MaryXmas -1 points 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 14:51:23 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss [op] -1 points 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 14:56:09 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] MaryXmas
[ - ] MaryXmas 0 points 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 18:30:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss [op] 0 points 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 18:41:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 1 point 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 14:42:18 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 2 points 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 21:26:34 ago (+2/-0)
Direct and immediate action is great, but we need to work on long term strategies as well, things that might take decades to bear fruit.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss [op] 3 points 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 21:37:19 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 3 points 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 14:57:33 ago (+3/-0)
Spock was a Freudian nut, and Spock was buddies with James Rockefeller since college.
The Rockefellers were buddies with a guy named Holland Sacket Duell, a member of the New York Senate. Sackett was a partner in Duell, Sloan and Pierce, the first publishers of that freak Spock's book that told women to listen to their instincts. They can't tell the difference between instincts and emotions, so parenting became "mommy says he can have it because it makes mommy feel good.
The Rockefeller's hand is uncovered in the background of so much nasty shit, somebody should have assassinated the whole lot of them before the first world war,
The Tuskegee syphilis experiments were them with the initial funding.
The Alan Memorial nut house in Montreal was them, where they put Donald Ewan Cameron the even nuttier Freudian shrink who ran the MKUltra brainwashing experiments on patients for that sadistic jew Sidney Gottleib. They picked up Cameron at the Nuremburg trials where he was opining about how psychiatrists should be the ultimate authority in society and Germans should have to apply for a license to have kids because they were always going to be bad people.
The reviews for that idiot's book on Amazon are glowing retarded jews saying buy it, it's great.
He killed kids by causing sudden infant death syndrome and then he said they should all be vegan.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss [op] 4 points 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 15:18:45 ago (+4/-0)
It all changed post WWII, when young people started to move away from their parents, particularly war vets who were eligible to buy a home with their VA benefits. Because they weren't living together as a larger family, they turned to a popular book, written by a pediatrician with minimal child rearing experience who based his recommendations on opinion and observation rather than statistical evidence and previous generations of successful child rearing.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 3 points 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 15:48:44 ago (+3/-0)
The psycho trick is in saying the opposite. "You can do it" raises the spectre of failure that may not have occurred to them. Now they "need" the book even more.
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 3 yearsJun 3, 2022 21:28:52 ago (+1/-0)
Wow, you're right, and this is insidious.