Sign into an existing account

Will my life improve if I do this?

Looking around at the white men who took your offer, it seems that the opposite is true, they are much more noticably miserable, angry, and generally stressed out than those of them who have rejected your proposal.

For the sake of my personal happiness, it seems to me the best route for me to take is to work to expand my privilege and to increase its value, which means more oppression of others who do not share my privilege is the ideal thing to aim for, as well.

I want the value of my privilege to be as high as possible, and for the oppression of others to be as high as can be as well, so that I may maximize the benefit I can get out of being white and male.

Unless you can give me a compelling reason not to.

What? Their lives will improve? How does that benefit me? Will they reciprocate and try to help me in appreciation for me helping them?

No need for you to answer that, I already can see the answer, and it is that the other sex and the other races will not do such a thing.

Indeed, what they will do is continually demand more from me in perpetuity, all the while their hatred of me will be continually amplified until my mere existence is a problem for them, a problem that they are only going to get increasingly confident that they have to solve by any means.

You know what that means? That means that making sacrifices to help them only leads to the inevitability of them deciding to make the attempt of killing me, and people like me.

Thats not a deal I'd say is worth taking, even if I were of the altruistically charitable mindset, that's something which is unjustifiable.

Altruism seeks to make things better for all by lifting everyone to a baseline where they can sustain themselves, this idea of yours only creates populations which cannot sustain themselves, and instead are dependent upon another group for their survival, it also causes this group to increasingly abuse the group they rely on until they decide to destroy the hand feeding them, and then they starve to death, because they have lost the ability to feed themselves.

That's something no rational altruist would ever consider to worth supporting, it's pure idiocy to think of this plan as anything good, even if you were self sacrificingly invested in the benefit of groups to which you don't belong.

Make no mistake, I'll help someone of another race, or of the opposite sex, but only of there is something in it for me to do so.

I might don't for the satisfaction of a thank you, or in the absence of gratitude, I'd me happy that they are doing a bit better thanks to my input, which makes me feel good and sarisfies my image of myself as being a good man.

Maybe it's a specific person who I know and like, then because of my relationship to them, when they have a good experience, I get to experience a bit of that for myself, that's just empathy.

There can be many ways that helping others benefits me, but your ideas don't do any of that.

I gain nothing from offering others this kind of "help", I lose a great deal up front, they are unsatisfied with anything they gain, then I only lose more as time goes on, and they are more unhappy in that same period, and it end with them destroying me, and then themselves.

In what world does anyone benefit from such a charity? If anyone is heartless here, it's you, you come in here and coax us into arranging for everyone to get more and more miserable and then die.

The way you do it, my God, you are emotionally abusive, manipulative and everything you say is either some bullshit assertion that could be torn apart by anyone with a brain and the interest to do so, or it's some form of hatred towards whites and men repackaged as just showing some fake concern for everyone else.

You are a nasty member of a death cult looking to indoctrinate more recruits, and your ideas will lead to everyone destroying themselves, including those poor minorities you pretend to give a damn about.

Fuck you. Just, fuck you.

Your type are the ones tearing the world apart, not that those who you trick into subscribing to your cult of hate disguised as love aren't also accountable for their actions.

They aren't being directly controlled by you, they are doing as you'd have them do out of their own will, and while they may act out of ignorance, it's up to them to be grown ass adults who inform themselves about the decisions they make before they make them.

You offer nothing but misery and destruction to everyone, you get people to waste their lives making things worse, under the delusion that they are making them better.

Like a typical manipulator, you use a positive mindset and the best qualities of mankind to get them to do terribly destructive things, paving the road to hell with good intentions.

It's a typical response to manipulators to start thinking selfishly and in terms of transactions, that's the way psychologists who actually care about helping their clients will advise them when they are trying to break free of their abusers.

What's the personal benefit to staying in this relationship? What's the likely end that this relationship will arrive at if it continues as it has so far? What am I to them (how do they most likely see me)? Is there a sign of change? Is it fair to blame me for the problems that others are facing?

For a lot of people leaving cults, abusers, or other such toxic environments, they must ask these questions to themselves, these are painful questions that the manipulators in their lives often try to stop them from asking.

They do so the way you do, with guilt, and shame, and fear, and blame, and other things that make asking these questions so needlessly unpleasant that the questioner stops.

They continue to suffer, trapped in the situation they shouldn't be in.

What I noticed today is that you changed tactics, you tried to get me to look at people you assume I think of as incapable of goodness being kind to me.

Under your direction.

I'm not surprised by this, I've experienced all manner of people, women, black, and more, who aren't like me and who do good things for me, not because some professors arranged it, but because they are acting out of genuine decency.

I might surprise you to let you know that I do the same to them In most encounters, it's the default to be nice to others, unless you have reason not to be, or are in such a state where kindness is not your default state of mind (and even even you can make a conscious effort to overcome your personal issues to not let it make things worse on the outside).

Ultimately being good to other people is a service not just to them, but also to yourself.

This was not kindness, it was not goodness, it wasn't basic decency, it was you realizing that one route to control over your class was closed off, and then you switched gears to embarrass everyone with some display.

Let me guess, for as long as I don't disagree with you, and "ruin the class" for the other students, you will continue to show me all this type of treatment.

But if I go back to being "disruptive" you will immediately go back to trying to make an example of me.

That's called lovebombing, it's a classic brainwashing technique and as a psychologist you should know what kind of game you are playing here.

I haven't lost respect for you, I had your number from the way you began the first class, you are a narcissistic control freak whose wasted her life in a cult ideology that has only made things worse for you, and now you want to satisfy your mental issues by forcing vulnerable people into adopting adopting same destructive ideology.

Like someone who is a part of a pyramid scheme, and proud of their ability to trick others into making the same mistakes.

Might I add, the students are obviously enjoying it a whole lot more when your domination is being challenged, and rather than passively accepting you preaching at them, the interactions between the likes of me and the black students were never more authentic and respectful than when we were free to be honest about what we wanted, and how the other side factors into our wants and needs.

Your forced interactions are artificial and full of fake niceness that we can all feel, we know what you force us to present to each other is fake, and thus we are even more unknown under your dishonest kind of "sharing" than we were when we were using this time to be honest and transparent.

Humans want things, we need them, to act the roles you've given us as these artificial characters with assigned psychological characteristics that we don't truly experience outside of your narrow minded judgemental marxist dogma, these aren't us.

You are taking real people and making them puppets, how can there be any "truth" or "reconciliation" between real people who can't be their genuine selves.

You don't listen to us, you tell is who we are and try to twist everything we say to make is out to be these character roles you have in mind.

Roles assigned to us on the basis of our race and sex, which you bully us into pretending we fit into.

Just, fuck right off.

This isn't critical race theory, there's nothing critical about it, it's not even a theory being applied here, this is just race.

A myopic narrow minded and obtusely bigoted idea of how race and sex SHOULD affect people's lives.

I noticed that you ask a questionnaire to us during our first class, you had us walk forwards and backwards on response to certain questions.

I walked forwards and backwards during times when you think I should have gone the other direction. As if you had the authority to tell me what kind of life I've lived, native how you never did this to anyone who wasn't white.

Not that I could've answered wrong anyways, your questions had nothing to do with our real verifiable experiences, they were only concerned with how we've felt in the past.

I wasn't even being "contrarian", whatever you think that word means, I was answering honestly, there were times I could've stepped backwards, but didn't, because I honestly didn't think that it was the honest answer.

You just found that I was on the wrong place at the end of that exercise and then assumed I was dishonest. That in itself is dishonest, I was fully willing to be engaged in your course at that point, I thought I could learn something from being involved in it.

That was before I learned that this course wasn't about learning, but about being told what was what, and manipulated into agreeing with baseless assertions of oppression and privilege.

So that's when I started goofing off, you failed as a teacher, but your curriculum left you no option but failure.

Remember when I had to be removed from class the first time? It was my response to your demonization of elements of human nature that set us off against each other for the second time.

We talked about hate, I talked about how if hate was just bad, we wouldn't have it.

Your response was that snake venom is natural and harmful. That was when I proceeded to "undermine" you.

I wasn't making a naturalistic fallacy, and even if I was, your response wasn't a good analogy, there was no equivalency between what I said and what you responded with, snake venom didn't evolve for the benefit of humans, it evolved for the benefit of snakes, whom the quality of possessing venom had served very well.

I knew it was dumb, you did too, I can tell that your response was reflexive, rather than thinking of my statement, you instead just decided to shut it down with the first thing you could say.

It was not a good response, and I called you on it, rather than being a real teacher and recognizing that it wasn't a good response, then talking about what I said about the evolutionary nature of hatred, you instead were focused on being the alpha bitch in the room.

My guess from how things were when I returned to your classes is that you never quite got that feeling of being feared or respected as an authority again.

Everyone saw you not as the alpha who could shut up an omega like me, but instead as a fragile ego barking at comparable weakling you were so unwisely assigned to put in our place.

And now we laugh at you, and you can hear us, we know, and we don't care, you deserve no respect.

Then you complain about us "bullying" you, we hate you because you are a woman, we hate you because you "call us out", we hate you because your (predictably) Jewish.

No, we hate you because you came in expecting to be able to bully US and we would just accept it, and if I wasn't in the classes with them, they probably would've let you get your way.

That's probably what happened in every other such class you've taught, right?

I don't care what happens to you, you aren't worth my thoughts, I deal with you once a week and then you are a non presence in my mind.

If anything, when I'm dealing with you, you are a source of entertainment for your students, you are a joke.

When you told is you were Jewish, we all laughed, it was just so much of a punchline, but it happened in real life. We didn't even say anything to prompt you to share that with us.

You want us to feel bad for you? Do you suffer your jewishness? I've seen the car you drive, the job you have, its not something people wouldn't envy.

You ancestors, oh I do feel bad for them, they have to suffer the fate of having a turd like you for a descendant, I'm sure they look at you with disdain and would die again of embarrassment if it were possible.

The holocaust wasn't the worst thing to happen to your people, it was that they would be replaced with power tripping harpies like you, and since I know you don't have any kids, you are how the bloodline of some particularly unfortunate bastards has to end. Your soul is empty, as empty as your ovaries are of eggs.

Why would anyone want to kill you? You are already dead, and suffering far worse in life than you ever would in hell.

Speaking figuratively here of course, I'm still an atheist, just as you are, I don't believe in the afterlife or a God.

That was a surprise to you, that I was against abortion as an atheist, on atheistic scientific grounds using secular morality to argue my case.

That hurt you somehow, because I wasn't in full alignment with any of the ideological categories you thought I had to belong to.

You act like you think you have everything figured out, you refuse to learn, and I don't think your age factors into it, its likely you've assumed you got a the answers the moment your brain got infected by this poisonous ideology you are trying to force onto us.

I'm exposing you for everything you are, but you are a child, and will childishly focus on how you made me upset.

I'm not upset with you, my advice might make things marginally better for you if you would just open your mind to the actual nature of the people you engage with, rather than pretending we are putting on am acr and really just fall into those sterile categories you have in that book of yours.

The thing that got me kicked out for good was my insistence that a man you brought to our class was in fact a man.

All the arguments fall apart.

Never has the genetic origin of a mental illness ever served as a disqualifying factor for it as a mental illness, except where it comes to homosexuality and transgenderism. It's removal from the dsm is under reasoning that should disqualify other classifications of mental disorder, yet doesn't.

Almost as if they were looking for an excuse to make this exception amd couldn't find another justification.

I accepted that a part of the brain was different, doesn't make them a woman, that's still a brain that is distinctly male, with one small inconsistency distinguishing it from those of other males. It certainly isn't the brain of a female, even a casual comparison would reveal that.

We see abnormalities in other brains too, autistic brains, schizophrenic brains, all manner of mental conditions show up in the brain. Not a surprise, given that they are, after all, conditions that affect the way the brains behaves.

But apply this to LGBT and all of a sudden the bar is set real low for the sake of making disqualifying them from being mental disorders easier. That's a clear sign that politics has the reigns in hand, not science.

I had a private argument with you about how history relates to moral advancement, you are a marxist, and this is evident in that you think that moral standards always progress towards some definite endpoint of a "best" morality.

My response was that no moral positions are better or worse than any other, there's no such thing as moral progress, that slavery and racism would one day become moral acceptable, or even straight up morally good again is not only entirely plausible, it's also likely.

Our society is in decline, on this we agree, but we likely won't just have some ideas about right and wrong be locked in place when that happens, it's open to change.

Very likely the kind of rhetoric you have created regarding matters like race and sex will result in the enslavement of blacks and women by white men like myself once the collapse happens and we begin to rebuild from that.

We'd use the feminist and civil rights movement as examples of how liberation of these groups starts, and then we will point to your CRT courses for an example of how it ends.

A mistake to never be repeated, until some future generations will inevitably repeat them.

History repeats itself, in times of sufficient levels of comfort and security, we forget how to be cruel, why our forebears were cruel, and why in some cases we must be cruel as well.

It's not going to be that bad, it'll be more like how it was all those other times in history, an equilibrium will be reached, everyone will adapt to accepting such a world as normal, just as they had before, and also as they had before, most people will be happy with their lives, even if they are lived as the property of another, historically speaking, happiness in slavery wasn't uncommon, it was in fact the expectation of slaves to be happy throughout most eras.

Women would do great with living under such conditions, thetd thrive as the slaves of men, just as they had before, this is all due to how female psychology is especially adapted to such a life.

So yes, all your moral progress is likely to progress to its opposite, when things go wrong people look for reasons, race and gender politics is very hard not to notice.

The end of history isn't some state of our culture or society, it's when the last human has died, these values of yours are always going to be subject to change, and sometimes a zealous push for something leads to a reaction that results in a net push in the opposite direction.

A lot of leftists are afraid of this, it means that when they are looked back on by people in the future, they will be seen as culturally and morally and politically regressive and primitive and just plain wrong.

Leftists like to be told what is good and bad, they like the certainty of it all, to know that what they see as the ultimate evil could become good, and their good could become evil, is a terrifying prospect.

The bad part is even of whites are wiped out, the same values could still come about, if the world is much worse for not having us in it, the other races would look back on how things turned out as they did, and long for the days when the superior breed of man, who was too good for this Earth, had ruled it well.

Rather than it falling apart in his absence. You can easily have white supremacy in the absence of white people.

My proposition that an alien species would be racist and see racism as a sign of advanced culture was laughed at, but we agreed that a galaxy crossing species would be so far advanced than us, that we'd have difficulty guessing what their cultural standard would be, yet you seem certain that you at least know what it cannot be, on no basis you exclude racism, yet I can show you how one could conclude it as I say, when one looks at the track record of racist people vs those who are not. You are so proud and smug, even when talking about areas of information you acknowledge a lack of any idea about.

You know what I fear? I fear that one day all the life of Earth will end, and by then there is no earthborne life existing independently of their now-lost planet, that the terrestrial kinds of beings which this rock had given birth too would share in the ultimate fate of their mother, annihilation.

That keeps me up at night, but it seems as though your plans for the world threaten to grant us this fate, you'd focus on all this petty nonsense about justice, forever, so that when the last day comes for our planet, it comes for everything our planet had produced as well.

I see your ideology as an existential threat on a scale you never conceived of. It's this nightmare that compels me to wipe it out, to challenge your dogma and show it up for the insanity that it is.

I'm not happy that we won't be having classes together anymore, not because because I enjoyed them, but because I had enjoyed getting to know my classmates.

Notice them when I'm gone I've left my impression, they will never respect you again, never fear you, you've been made an embarrassment, and will continue to be laughed at.

I will be at the red river ex, enjoying my summer, free of you.

Have a good life, and I hope that you will one day free yourself of the true chains which bind you. Your mind still has hope for it, I wish you could realize that.

I will be willing to welcome you into my life again as a friend rather than as an enemy, but only after you've left this disgusting cult behind. It's not good for you.

I myself can't stand to be exposed to it anymore, I've nothing left to learn from this experience, though you've taught me a great deal, and I can respect you for that. At least.

I truly wish you nothing but the best. Thank you for having me in your classes, I'm sorry it didn't work out.