John Hinckley Jr who almost killed Reagan and whose brother was scheduled to meet the son of vice president Bush the next day (Hinckley's were oil business partners with bushes) now talking.. Coverup story continues. But why now?
In a book a journalist author says was truth written as fiction after he was warned by CIA types called "The Afternoon of March 30th" (look on Amazon) the author talks about the extreme media blackout concerning the direct relationship between the hinckleys and the bushes.
He discovered this as a reporter for a small newspaper working the story live as things started getting covered up.
How Reagan was about to impose some oil taxes that would have affected the Bushes.
How Bush's son Neil Bush of Silverado savings and loan infamy was friends with hinckley's son and they had a lunch appointment for the day after the assassination attempt. The existence of this lunch date breaking news on the wire was reported live by an ASTOUNDED John Chancellor who was NBC news anchor back in the day when they were only three channels and being the news anchor meant you were in a position of extreme responsibility. (I saw Chancellor read this myself as I, as was the whole country, was glued to the live TV coverage as it was unknown if Reagan would survive and we all wondered if we were seeing Kennedy all over again)
The live remark the flabbergasted Chancellor made as he read the newswire live in the coverage following Reagan's assassination attempt was later stricken from the media and is incredibly hard to find anywhere. (Although the clip did exist on the original YouTube before Google bought them out).
Imagine someone tries to assassinate the president and the brother of the assassin is going to have a prearranged lunch the day after the assasination with the son of the Vice President who will become president! Suspicious!!!???
In fact the cover-up of all this is one of the major indicators of how important and how likely a conspiracy was involved.
The close connections between the Hinckley's and the Bushes was NEVER reported by any media at the time.
It was all Jodie Foster nonsense which really made no sense even at the time. In fact the book talks about the possible threat made to Foster to reveal her lesbianism to get her to go along and keep quiet.Foster NEVER talked about it..EVER.
Reagan was an upstart who was not supposed to win the primary. Bush was fixed to be the president after Carter who was himself an upstart after Ford was defeated. Bush was CIA and had been influential in getting Nixon out of office and Gerald Ford into office.
Ford had been hand picked as VP after Nixon's original VP Spiro Agnew was threatened by CIA types to resign or else (Agnew stated this himself later on TV) Ford had been on the infamous Warren Commission which covered up the assassination of Kennedy which there was a lot of evidence that Bush was around to see if not being directly involved in.
And suddenly Reagan's assassinated or nearly assassinated while it is revealed Bush's son and the brother of the assasine are meeting in a PREPLANNED meeting the day after the assassination!
There was also good speculation that a professional writer who was close to the bushes actually faked the whole Jody Foster narrative. I forget his name but he wrote fiction novels and apparently also wrote cover stories for the CIA.
Strangely Hinckley got the quote "CIA judge" that always presided over CIA cases in Washington DC and he did not go through the normal judge roulette wheel for the assignment of judges.
Also he did this in one of the few jurisdictions were Insanity is A defense for attempted murder.
And there were many basic secret service precautions that were not followed March 30th like never have a president walk in open from a public door to the Limousine.
The big question to me is why is he speaking now after he's gotten this freedom and all this has been forgotten. Is someone trying to send a message to Future presidents that they can take you out at any time?
Edit the authors original webpage from 9 years ago which now does not show up in Archive.org way back machine and is now totally in Chinese or Japanese...odd. SAVE THIS!
https://archive.ph/wuULKAnd another of the authors pages about president George Bush the 1st son Neil
https://archive.ph/r6JytEdit. 5 page review of the rare book is here
https://archive.org/stream/TheAfternoonOfMarch30/TheAfternoonOfMarch30_djvu.txt
[ + ] TrannyHunter
[ - ] TrannyHunter 1 point 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 18:34:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Laputois
[ - ] Laputois 0 points 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 21:18:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Laputois
[ - ] Laputois 2 points 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 11:03:56 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 11:03:52 ago (+2/-0)
The teaser are mentions of Catcher in the Rye being a common thread, with Hinkley, the guy who shot John Lennon who had been pimped as a modern Jesus replacement for the boomers, and a stalker who shot a hollywood actress, and the guy who shot JFK.
Hinkley said "I’m sure the big part of me is Holden Caulfield, who is the main person in the book. The small part of me must be the Devil.”
He read from the book when he was pt on the stand at his trial.
Salinger of course was a jew. Hs daughter said he was nuts. He spoke in tongues (not in a religious chanting way) and drank his own urine.
Salinger was part of a US intelligence group after WW2 called "the Richie Boys". They were hired because they spoke German, English and Yiddish. They interrogated German POWs, and in the most unethical occurrence also translated the subject's response.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 11:33:53 ago (+2/-0)
The mystique of Salinger of the hermit was carefully cultivated to give his reputation the aura of "misunderstood genius" when he was just a jewish hack and stopped writing when people figured out he had no talent.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 11:40:05 ago (+1/-0)
That book sells alienation and was influential in creating the "rebellious teen" motif. The amount of parents today who believe absolutely that it's just natural for teens to rebel and run away, drink and use drugs is astounding.
There have been campaigns to have it withdrawn from school lists from people who identify it as communist since it came out, but they're called crazy Christian conspiracy theorists by women who think it's insightful and deep.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 1 point 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 11:49:49 ago (+1/-0)
What would have made "Catcher in the Rye" worth reading would be describing that spoiled punk Holden Caulfield getting his ass kicked by a bunch of niggers and him going back home to cry to his parents.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 23:19:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes [op] 1 point 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 11:15:02 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 1 point 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 11:21:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes [op] 1 point 3.0 yearsJul 1, 2022 11:22:52 ago (+1/-0)