I believe that at its core, leftism or liberalism is the desire to cheat. Leftists always want to lower behavioral standards and reduce accountability. There are exceptions to this rule, like when the traditionalists justify some sort of culturally entrenched scam — like the military. But usually the cheats, the opportunists, are leftoids. They hate accountability. They always accuse you of being the exploiter when they all do nothing of merit and live off someone elses work while spending as much time as possible cooming and consooming and talking about pedowood franchise.
Leftism is the natural choice of the liar and the cheat. This is why their politics are dirty. This is why their discourse is so disingenuous. Truth is the enemy of liberalism. If we could all really see who was useful in this society and who was dead weight, who was working and who was bullshitting their way through life on someone else’s back, the left would be destroyed.
they don't want to talk about themselves or cheating or chess. they want to talk about you
That's the tactic they use when they can't back up their beliefs or are too stupid to explain them (they just believe them without question). They move the discussion into offensive questions rather than defensive- ad hominem. rather than defend their belief they attack you for why you believe differently.
Husband 1 and Husband 2 both go home after work and each of them are greeted by their wives at their doors. Each of their wives say, "I know you're cheating on me".
Husband 1 says - "What are you talking about? Why do you think I'm cheating?" Husband 2 says - "Don't you ever accuse me of cheating. You're crazy."
Husband 1 wants to see the evidence so that he can discredit it. Husband 2 does not want any evidence presented because it will only prove he's guilty. He also tries to discredit the one making the accusation.
Again, when trying to spot a liar - An honest person wants all of the proof and evidence presented so they can discredit it. A liar knows that there will be evidence against them, and because they will not be able to discredit it, they will need to prevent it from being presented. They will also try to discredit the one presenting the evidence.
Another example of this is calling someone a "Conspiracy Theorist".
Not entirely true. Someone that is constantly accused of things they haven't done and had no intention of doing - will also resort to simply saying 'Fck off - you're full of shit'..... It's a joo gas lighting tactic to so overwhelm someone in defending themselves from purposely spurious allegations they have no time or energy to do anything else.
Years ago, on a site that I don't remember, that I would open in two windows, one set to play stranger and one to play computer, I would mirror my opponent's move to the computer and then correspond the move to the human opponent.
That's close to the solution to a chess riddle: You must play eight grandmasters, four as white, four as black. For each win, you get a +1, each draw a 0, and each loss a -1. You must finish with a total score of zero or more, otherwise, you are executed. You are not that great at chess. Is it possible to avoid execution? (Also, why do so many riddles end with execution for failure?)
If you are playing them at the same time you can do the same opening move as one opponent and their response is the response you give to the opponent playing as white. Repeat 4x to have eight games.
There was one of those modern TV magicians that did this trick to eight chess players. He told them he was was unbeatable, and challenged them to multiple games all at the same time. Needless to say the total score at the end was close to zero, and they were all confused how he was able to multitable so many top players at the same time and not lose.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 20:16:14 ago (+2/-0)
Leftism is the natural choice of the liar and the cheat. This is why their politics are dirty. This is why their discourse is so disingenuous. Truth is the enemy of liberalism. If we could all really see who was useful in this society and who was dead weight, who was working and who was bullshitting their way through life on someone else’s back, the left would be destroyed.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 20:34:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 2 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 16:37:12 ago (+2/-0)
That's the tactic they use when they can't back up their beliefs or are too stupid to explain them (they just believe them without question). They move the discussion into offensive questions rather than defensive- ad hominem. rather than defend their belief they attack you for why you believe differently.
[ + ] uvulectomy
[ - ] uvulectomy 3 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 16:20:08 ago (+3/-0)
Sounds like @diggernicks when asked about the weather in Tel Aviv, or when pointing out he's a degenerate pedophile.
(inb4 "haha you're butthurt" or "yuo haev a tinfoil buttplug lolz")
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 16:21:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 16:19:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 15:59:52 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FlatPlaneReality
[ - ] FlatPlaneReality 2 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 15:14:53 ago (+2/-0)
- they're defending their honor and their innocence. what are NPCs defending?
The Matrix. They are the agent smith, who summons at times to attack anyone threatening the matrix. This is what the NPC's are defending.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 15:21:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 3 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 14:38:08 ago (+3/-0)
Husband 1 says - "What are you talking about? Why do you think I'm cheating?"
Husband 2 says - "Don't you ever accuse me of cheating. You're crazy."
Husband 1 wants to see the evidence so that he can discredit it.
Husband 2 does not want any evidence presented because it will only prove he's guilty. He also tries to discredit the one making the accusation.
Again, when trying to spot a liar - An honest person wants all of the proof and evidence presented so they can discredit it.
A liar knows that there will be evidence against them, and because they will not be able to discredit it, they will need to prevent it from being presented. They will also try to discredit the one presenting the evidence.
Another example of this is calling someone a "Conspiracy Theorist".
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 2 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 16:05:19 ago (+2/-0)
Someone that is constantly accused of things they haven't done and had no intention of doing - will also resort to simply saying 'Fck off - you're full of shit'.....
It's a joo gas lighting tactic to so overwhelm someone in defending themselves from purposely spurious allegations they have no time or energy to do anything else.
[ + ] Shitheel
[ - ] Shitheel 0 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 19:57:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 12:43:30 ago (+0/-0)
A variation on that is "yOu SuCk eZ woRK"
You see that on games like GTA5 where cheating is rampant and blatant.
Imagine lying about cheating, are you so feminine and insecure that you have to lie about cheating when everyone cheats?
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 12:48:22 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Ozark
[ - ] Ozark 2 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 12:03:05 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] GrayDragon
[ - ] GrayDragon 1 point 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 12:17:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 2 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 13:11:27 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 12:50:09 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 13:01:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Ozark
[ - ] Ozark 1 point 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 13:16:38 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Temp20210918c
[ - ] Temp20210918c 0 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 13:29:32 ago (+0/-0)
The question is probably intended to be worded so that it's clear that the games would happen concurrently. If the games are sequential, you're hosed.
[ + ] qwop
[ - ] qwop 0 points 2.8 yearsAug 15, 2022 19:45:30 ago (+0/-0)