It was invented before she wrote in her diary, it just was a recent invention that was not widely available, and only a select few people had access to them.
Furthermore, the greater reveal was that ink dating exposed that many of the later diary entries were revealed to have been written long after the war, handwriting analysis revealed that they were written in her father's hand, and her Fath outright admitted to having written these entries in the diary after the war and before publicizing it.
Particularly the more propagandistic entries were her fathers work, and not the work of a girl child going through puberty, her genuine entries were not written in ballpoint and were more of what you'd expect from the girl her age living under her circumstances.
Basically the equivalent of the anonymous story about how some 8 year old child had these profound sounding insights into some current event they children typically don't give a shit about.
This price of propaganda was a forgery, and it was known to be so for more than a decade before the fakery was exposed, only once too many people had access to the evidence of the forgery did they get forced to announce the truth, and even then they did so quietly, with little attention given to it.
That's what jew media does, it yells loudly its lies, until the lies cannot be upheld anymore, then they very briefly and quietly admit the lie.
So many people hear the lie and continue to believe it, while only the rare individual gets to know the truth that it was a lie.
and they feel as though they upheld their responsibility to the truth by confessing in such a way.
Basically like a message that has a bold message in large font, with a quiet font in the bottom that refutes the impression the big message would give to the reader.
Snopes does this all the time, they count on the headline effect to deceive people.
Just as jew media uses the exposure effect to do so.
The exposure effect being that the more people are exposed to a claim the more people will think it's a accurate reflection of reality.
If every serial killer you show is white, people will assume that white people are more likely to be serial killers, even if the reality is that black people are the ones with the highest chance of serial killing.
If almost every time people see a swan they are shown a black swan, they will assume that most swans are black.
By cherry picking the rarer instances, you can give the false impression that the rare example is the most common one, or vice versa.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 16, 2022 13:27:18 ago (+5/-0)
Furthermore, the greater reveal was that ink dating exposed that many of the later diary entries were revealed to have been written long after the war, handwriting analysis revealed that they were written in her father's hand, and her Fath outright admitted to having written these entries in the diary after the war and before publicizing it.
Particularly the more propagandistic entries were her fathers work, and not the work of a girl child going through puberty, her genuine entries were not written in ballpoint and were more of what you'd expect from the girl her age living under her circumstances.
Basically the equivalent of the anonymous story about how some 8 year old child had these profound sounding insights into some current event they children typically don't give a shit about.
This price of propaganda was a forgery, and it was known to be so for more than a decade before the fakery was exposed, only once too many people had access to the evidence of the forgery did they get forced to announce the truth, and even then they did so quietly, with little attention given to it.
That's what jew media does, it yells loudly its lies, until the lies cannot be upheld anymore, then they very briefly and quietly admit the lie.
So many people hear the lie and continue to believe it, while only the rare individual gets to know the truth that it was a lie.
and they feel as though they upheld their responsibility to the truth by confessing in such a way.
Basically like a message that has a bold message in large font, with a quiet font in the bottom that refutes the impression the big message would give to the reader.
Snopes does this all the time, they count on the headline effect to deceive people.
Just as jew media uses the exposure effect to do so.
The exposure effect being that the more people are exposed to a claim the more people will think it's a accurate reflection of reality.
If every serial killer you show is white, people will assume that white people are more likely to be serial killers, even if the reality is that black people are the ones with the highest chance of serial killing.
If almost every time people see a swan they are shown a black swan, they will assume that most swans are black.
By cherry picking the rarer instances, you can give the false impression that the rare example is the most common one, or vice versa.
Thats exposure effect.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 16, 2022 13:51:02 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 17, 2022 04:00:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 16, 2022 15:08:59 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] nwah
[ - ] nwah 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 16, 2022 13:35:43 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 16, 2022 13:49:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 16, 2022 18:07:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ThisGuy
[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 16, 2022 18:52:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 17, 2022 03:38:51 ago (+0/-0)