Aus animal scores a No.2 in mammals that make the best human companions. American animals didn't score! - Upgoat

-3

Aus animal scores a No.2 in mammals that make the best human companions. American animals didn't score!
submitted by paul_neri to Nature 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 08:30:20 ago (+2/-5) (www.msn.com)
https://www.msn.com/en-au/travel/news/scientists-rank-the-mammals-that-make-the-best-human-companions/ss-AAYpfKR?ocid=thanksDHP&cvid=47637092c92640de9d84f1af95dda1dd#image=25

[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 10:09:09 ago (+1/-0)

fake and gay. how many people are going to run out and buy a spotted deer?
and msn is crap, what a horrid web site!

[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 09:11:16 ago (+0/-0)

That coati seems possible.

Tri colored squirrel would be interesting but couldn't form a real bond.

Not many here I agree with.

Covers are basically racoons so yeah.

I don't know anything about wallabys

[ - ] DukeofRaul 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 08:31:26 ago (+1/-0)

My dog is American you bastard

[ + ] paul_neri

[ - ] paul_neri [op] 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 08:36:14 ago (+1/-0)

Don't shoot the messenger, bro! Just sayin' what the scientists said!

[ + ] HughBriss

[ - ] HughBriss 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 12:57:26 ago (+1/-0)

Oh, that's right, you're a "trust the science" guy. Well, fuck it, I'm a scientist too, and I say your scientists are wrong and fucked in the head if they don't like dogs.

[ + ] paul_neri

[ - ] paul_neri [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 21:40:25 ago (+0/-0)

I think the article used clumsy terminology - wild mammals would have been more appropriate imo.

Sign into an existing account