×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
22

What next, jews?...Euthanasia!

submitted by PostWallHelena to ClownWorld 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 11:30:17 ago (+22/-0)     (litter.catbox.moe)

https://litter.catbox.moe/isump0.jpeg

The next fucking excellent roll-out from jews in this amazing jewish run utopia is euthanasia.

They’ve pushed the bounds beyond all reason with murder for babies, with sex changes for kids, with “protections” for niggers and foreigners, and now their going to expand their powers to murder you, if you’re looking a little gimpy or long in the tooth, or maybe just a little depressed. They are now euthanizing children in Europe. Pro-euthanasia legislation has no oversight and its being abused and helpless whites are the victims of the jewish socialist medical tyranny.

Here’s a good thread by some gimpy left wing fag on twitter on the advancement of this agenda
https://twitter.com/anarchautist/status/1579321291953565696
https://nitter.net/anarchautist/status/1579321291953565696


26 comments block


[ - ] TheSimulacra 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 13:36:28 ago (+0/-0)

The Jab is Euthanasia, and its free.

[ - ] La_Chalupacabra 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 19:24:26 ago (+0/-0)

If you will recall, there were reports of midazolam -- which counts one of its uses as a lethal injection drug -- being overadministered to seniors during the initial covid lockdown panic.

Calling it "euthanasia" is just a soft-sell to get the public accustomed to the idea of what amounts to state-sanctioned culling of what are deemed as a burden upon the system.

In fact, getting the state involved in what should be the most private of affairs guarantees there will be abuses at every opportunity.

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 20:38:39 ago (+0/-0)

We need to suicide nigger babies pre life

[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 15:35:13 ago (+1/-0)

Isn't this legal in the US in certain states too?

[ - ] PostWallHelena [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 15:47:37 ago (+0/-0)

Yes absolutely.

[ - ] NiggerNiggerZooPals 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 13:15:26 ago (+2/-0)

Yeah. When doctors stopped following the hippocratic oath I knew things were gonna start going sideways.

Doctors should be promoting happy, healthy life. The day they stopped doing this they turned into bureaucratic death camps.

[ - ] PostWallHelena [op] 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 15:38:41 ago (+1/-0)

Theyve turned healthcare in to a factory and its about to become a jewish monopoly with socialized care. There will be no consideration for quality of care.

[ - ] Irelandlost 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 13:09:39 ago (+3/-0)

They’re already at it. Amazon are currently being sued for selling “suicide kits” of sodium nitrate to children. A survivor of one of the numerous rag head attacks in Belgium recently opted to be “euthanised” rather than deal with her trauma (topped herself with the assistance of doctors basically). And if I recall correctly around 20% of assisted suicides in Switzerland (the only country in Europe that allows the procedure for non-residents/citizens) list “weariness with life” as the underlying condition.

[ - ] Nosferatjew 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 13:37:15 ago (+3/-0)

Next? This is hardly "next", considering it's currently available in Canada and Switzerland, and maybe some other countries I haven't yet heard about.

[ - ] SumerBreeze 4 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 13:47:35 ago (+4/-0)

Isn’t euthanasia the #1 leading cause of death in Canada now?

Their idea of healthcare is “damn you are fucked up - ever thought about death as a solution?” That’s the kind of shit people are lauding as a free service!

[ - ] PostWallHelena [op] 4 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 15:30:24 ago (+4/-0)

No I think rn it’s cause unknown, aka the vax. But they have ways of killing you without ooficially euthanizing you: withholding food and water in critically ill people, going heavy on the morphine. All those deaths get categorized as heart disease or cancer of alzheimer’s. There’s some sort of euthanasia-lite going on perhaps in the majority of deaths. Hospice is murder.

[ - ] Sunman_Omega 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 15:54:07 ago (+2/-0)

And euthanasia is only pushed onto Whites. "Diversity" are given top-notch healthcare instead (if such a thing actually exists with socialized healthcare systems).

[ - ] CHIRO 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 14:59:30 ago (+2/-0)

Yeah, they're called Sarcos. You get in the capsule, the motor pumps it full of nitrogen. You die painlessly and the capsule doubles as your burial coffin - optionally, I take it. What a feat of engineering and human creativity. Kevorkian was doing it before it was cool, and his method seems more efficient in my opinion. Bring the canister and the helmet to person's home.

Although I'm not comfortable with any of it. I'm torn. I've debated it with people for years. On the one hand, I think it is immoral. On the other hand, I couldn't look someone in the eye, say, someone who suffered with debilitating ALS, and say to them with a straight face: "You're obligated to live." But of course, you run the risk, as always, that making this alternative available means you make it widely available, means you make it available for people who really should choose other alternatives.

I want to say it was available in a third country: Denmark?

[ - ] PostWallHelena [op] 4 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 15:34:53 ago (+4/-0)

Any scenario in which the government-medical complex financially gains from the death of the vulnerable is the sceanario in which it can never be permitted. Some 23 year old healthy girl was just suicided in the netherlands because she was depressed. Totally despicable.

[ - ] CHIRO 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 15:45:12 ago (+2/-0)

Let me play devil's advocate. In principle, doesn't some member of the medical complex gain from every problem? From any illness or disease? What sort of model system would you propose that involved no incentives for the treatment of millions of people, which also maintained the freedom of people to be less than ideally healthy? I mean, where everything down to mandatory exercise, banning of cigarettes/alcohol/other drugs and caloric intake monitoring weren't enforced? Put another way, in a system where people are free to be sick, what sort of model system would you propose that viably served the public's needs without a financial incentive to do this?

This isn't a rhetorical question.

[ - ] PostWallHelena [op] 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 16:42:59 ago (+2/-0)*

Well then if you cant find a way in which no one financially benefits you cant have euthanasia.

When my mom got chemo/radiation a few years ago she stopped eating she almost starved to death. We had to fight for a feeding tube. She did not want to die. She was not able to advocate well for herself though. They kept saying “well she’s not eating, she wants to die”. It was as if, once they knew they could charge medicare for 80,000 dollars in cancer treatment they didn’t care what happened to her. They WANTED her to die. She got better and was fairly functional for a few more years.

She got sick again (another condition) and was put on hospice which includes some free home care and equipment, provided the patient has less than 6 mos to live. Well, they weren’t feeding/hydrating her adequately (tube feeding through a machine) and they kept pushing morphine which she did not want. I trusted initially that they were prescribing sufficient nutrition, but after awhile, it didnt seem right to me and we brought a nutritionist in who told us they were starving her and dehydrating her to death. They acted like it was some sort of mistake but it wasn’t . They were mad that she refused morphine. They were mad when I insisted we get antibiotics for her jaw infection. This was basic care shit. Then I found out they get audited or fined or some shit if too many patient live past 6 months. Built-in incentive for murder.

She lived like 14 mos on hospice hahaha. They were trying to trick us into helping them to kill her faster. They wanted us to sign away our rights as family members to make decisions for her if she became unable. I was like “Why sould we do that?” They sent a social worker to the house every week to harass my father in to agreeing to withhold food and h2o, because “this can’t go on!” I said “this will go on until she says she wants us to withhold food and water and load her up with morphine while she starves” which she was perfectly able to communicate if she wanted to, but she never ever did. She was catholic, and that was a sin. That was who she was. They tried to pressure us into killing her, not once or twice. Continuously, for over a year. I believe this is SOP and they succeed in people who don’t have stubborn family members.

She had worked in healthcare and she red-pilled me on alot of their b.s. over the years. But everyone doesnt have that benefit. Family members don’t usually enter that scenario with a skeptical suspicious attitude towards care. But they should. They are fucking killing seniors for money.

We should outlaw the sale of cigarettes and alcohol, at least hard alcohol. No one should make money off that shit. Maybe we should outlaw the sale of some super unhealthy processed foods. If people want to cook their own heart attack food, let them. But we have to stop corporations from getting successful by hurting people with addictive substances. I dont give a fuck if restaurants fail. Restaurants are a luxury- we have too many of them.

[ - ] Rawrination 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 20:15:50 ago (+2/-0)

Oh My God. In any sane society that would have been attempted murder on their part.

We're so past time to stat shootin the fucks.

[ - ] PostWallHelena [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 20:23:46 ago (+0/-0)

Yeah unfortunately we are greatly outgunned.

[ - ] Rawrination 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 20:29:15 ago (+0/-0)

Out coordinated is the main problem.

Juden Peterstine radical individualism is ONLY ever pushed on Whites.

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 13, 2022 01:17:48 ago (+1/-0)

That's truly awful. I'm sorry to hear that. Unfortunately I have my own experiences with close friends and family in the healthcare setting. When did you lose your mom? Was she able to go in relative peace in the end?

While I am moved by this story personally - I've got a grandmother going through it - I'm not sure that it addresses the issue I identified in the previous comment. Would you eliminate the entire medical establishment?

If not, how do you provide public medical services in a nation with a population in the millions without incentivizing the service providers?

I'd also point out that if your theory says these evils are the result of profit-seeking, it makes almost no financial sense to kill someone who represents a consistent income stream. For example, if a hospital could bill $80,000 for chemo treatment, they'd be incentivized against wanting her to die. It would be better if she remained a cancer patient. A dead person generates no cash flow.

[ - ] PostWallHelena [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 13, 2022 17:45:09 ago (+0/-0)

I'm not sure that it addresses the issue I identified in the previous comment.
Yeah sorry it turn into a catharsis

I don’t want to remove all the profit incentives of medical care— I want to remove the profit incentives of euthanasia.

it makes almost no financial sense to kill someone who represents a consistent income stream

They work for medicare. Medicare apparently punishes the hospice contractors who have patients that live too long. Likewise nursing home have some contract where they can inherit all the assets of the deceased in exchange for services rendered. Thats what happened to my aunt.

For example, if a hospital could bill $80,000 for chemo treatment, they'd be incentivized against wanting her to die.

I wish I understood all the inner working of these bureacracies. But I know that after her chemo, she was cancer free and her only problem (that we knew of) at that point was her inability to eat. She was like 76. She had lost 30 lbs and was down to around 90. They wouldnt give us a marinol script. No we had to wait until she was down to 75 or 80 lbs and in the hospital. We had to go through unbelievable bullshit to get her a lousy feeding tube. Im telling you they wanted her to die. Once the chemo was done they did not want to do one single solitary thing to save her life. I thought, “this bitch did not go through chemo and radiation to be cured of cancer and have her ass burned from the inside out for us to let her die of neglect! ” but that is what they absolutely wanted to do. I’m telling you, we had to scream and shout at these people for weeks to get them to do what their fucking supposed to do.

A dead person generates no cash flow.

I disagree.

[ - ] Cunt 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 15:55:36 ago (+1/-0)

I don't about Denmark but it is legal in all Australian states.

[ - ] PostWallHelena [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 17:51:34 ago (+0/-0)

Apparently theres some new law in Queensland?

[ - ] Cunt 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 13, 2022 06:13:10 ago (+0/-0)

All the stated have passed laws, QLD, NSW & SA will come into effect next year.

The two territories aren't allowed to pass that sort of legislation because their local governments are like local councils in the states but with a little more power, but less than state governments. I think the ACT or NT were the first to introduce euthanasia but got shut down by the federal government who controls them.

[ - ] Teefinyomouf 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 12, 2022 17:43:52 ago (+0/-0)

The case for euthanasia is that the subject doesn't need to make the agonizing decision whether or not to end their life, and they avoid the moral hazard too. Instead, a team of medical professionals assesses the situation and makes a determination based on science. Once made, there is no need to inform the subject, though perhaps next of kin can be notified so they can make the proper arrangements.

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 13, 2022 01:09:46 ago (+0/-0)

This sounds like a remarkably bad idea. After the last two years we've lived, you want teams of medical doctors deciding whether to euthanize you? You're going to 'muh science' your own life? It's hard to overstate how much I hate your entire train of thought here.