Sign into an existing account

I agree with this strategy. Where i live the politicians have wanted to reintroduce mountain lions and wolves to cull the deer population. I say let's be consistent- if we are to reintroduce these predators, then we should also repopulate bison, beaver, and elk.

"We should have more accountability in government"

"Yes, I want to gas the kikes, too"

We should let more niggers on our countries

Agree and amplify. This is one of the oldest rhetorical tricks, and still one of the most effective.

Yes, I'm sure you're right. I agree.

It's called Agree and Amplify

Negating someone by using the word "but" will unconsciously be picked up by the other. Resistance emits light, resistance makes energy manifest.

Honestly, if you want to have productive conversations, you need to ground them. A circuit cannot transmit properly if there's no common ground. That means we both have to start from a place we can both agree, and work up from there. The only discussion should only arise from details not from the main point of contention.

Excellent tactic, stuff like this that allows us to verbally wiggle our way past their defenses is great. It's like entering a password to modify a previously protected file. Taking advantage of their existing programming gives us a lot of power over their future programming and can derail some of them and set them up to leave the plantation.

I just created a subverse dedicated to NPC reprogramming, https://www.talk.lol/v/NPC_reprogramming Hopefully it'll grow into a treasure trove of tactics and ideas like this.

I've proposed something similar in the past, there were people arguing that racists should be deported, so I proposed forwarding that motion and having all white nationalists be moved to one of the many third world shitholes that keeps sending us their people.

I wanted to advertise it to you as a way we could group together, and build a power base for ourselves from the ground up.

Objections were raised, many of them.

I also proposed attacking the labels used against us by engaging on some elaborate philosophy exploring the concepts these labels are associated with.

If racist is no longer a purely negative thing, then not only is it depowered, but also all the times when it was used could be reassessed in retrospective.

I did this in a bar a while back.

At a fancy whisky bar in a big city visiting a friend, all of a sudden about 30 young OBVIOUSLY liberal white women come walking in with a couple "nu male" orbiter in tow.

Unbeknownst to us there had been a "pro-abortion" rally down the street at an abortion clinic.

So these 2 young dumb university chicks stark asking us about the flights of whisky we had ordered and told us about this rally that had just ended.

They ask us, two 30 something white guys dressed well about whisky then our view about funding abortion.

My buddy puts his head in his hands cause he knows I'm about to run them off but I was feeling flirty and just leaned into it.

I was like "YEA we definitely need to fully fund all inner city abortion clinics, these underprivileged women aren't capable of supporting themselves much less a child and we know that 99% of all urban babies are born with no father"

I went on about how the rural area's are more privledged because studies show that they are more likely to have a cohesive family unit and be raised to be more empathetic, resourceful, and employed.

I just made all the arguments I would have made but instead of nigger I said urban, and instead of White I said rural. They could not stop nodding in agreement for about 30 minutes.

Those whores got drunk and flirted with us for hours, when they left their bill came and they kinda hinted at us covering it, LOL nah. Wish I had been quicker on my feet and asked them to pay for ours for "equality" but I had already had about 4 flights.

It is often forgotten that one’s desire and perspective isn’t wanted or needed, ever, even by those one assumes is on “their side.”

Furthermore, if both parties initially recognize each other as “the enemy,” why begin a conversation at all?

Pacification is for the weak, double speak is for the wicked, and sometimes, in the end of matters, the ruled live by the rules of the rulers. Let your decree be law, and their quiet disregard their fate.

The circumstance I describe is the one you perhaps live in now and is provided as proof of the matter.

At what point then did they begin their agreeableness to your utter dismay at the present?

I've learned the power of saying yes even if your next sentence is going to completely disagree with what they've said. Half the time all they hear is the first yes.

I agree with you, OP.

I can't even convince this group on why abortion is great, trying to reprogram NPC's who can be reprogrammed in just minutes of CNN is quite a challenge.

BTW, why would we ever want to stop someone from getting an abortion. The only rule I'd like to add is that if you get an abortion, you have your reproductive organs removed at the same time and you never get to have children. We'd cull the herd of lefties and children with terrible mothers from our society in a single generation.

Importing foreigners and elevating them to a carbon footprint of a first worlder is causing climate change. Population and carbon production would be declining without immigration.

We need people to use less electricity.
Yes, I agree wholeheartedly. If we culled the negroes and jews there would be a smaller population and thus less requirement for electricity.

I might need some practice but seems like a good idea I’ll admit.

This is strategically the best move. It disarms the NPC immediately and they are receptive to your programming. They will either than implement your idea (power bars for Roku/cable box/teevee) or weird cognitive dissonance will cause them to stop arguing their nonsense for a little while at least.