we already know this, the arrogant kike just carries on as if every pattern or piece of logic you use is somehow "incorrect" while he posts his pedo content trying to normalize that mentality towards White skinned females
inbred kike filth will always act as if they have a moral right to behave like the utter filth that they are
there is no talking to these people, we need to end their existence in our White countries for the future of our people
Thinking about it I think my favorite comment you made there (and you made several doozies, mind) was your response to my request about the article in the American Sociological Review where you claimed it was from Jews and I asked you to prove it. You responded, and I'm not making this up, essentially that it was unreasonable of me to think an American publication wouldn't be run by Jews and that it was 'Jewish' basically for me to ask you to substantiate your claim. This is putting aside the related fact that you called that article a book. Ha!
nah you are a kike being outed as the kike you are
Seriously if we knew where you were IRL you'd be done already kike
now get the fuck out of White America, you kikes are not, and never will be White, or normal, or welcome in our lands ever again
kikes are not jews, calling them that and repeating it won't make it true kike lmfoa hahahahaha...the kike can't even point to contributions kikes didn't steal...filthy kike scum like joe mccarthy are everything they claim not to be
You are a child rapist trying to gaslight people, the only "glow" i see here is coming from you kike filth
Question: how transparent are the finances of the wealthiest, non-Jewish elite? The question is not whether there are data. Of course there are data. The question is how reliable we believe the accessible data are.
Question: how reliable is the publication in question?
Hypothetical: let's just grant the things being said about the Jews are true for a moment - call this theory 'JQ'.
Depending on our answers to the other questions, it's possible that we simply shouldn't expect reliable financial data to support JQ.
The issue is not your empiricism, per se; there isn't anything inherently wrong with the notion that (a) if some claim X is true about a financially elite group, then (b) gathering financial data will either prove X or ~X.
But, again, this is about a bigger picture. If the landscape is one of treachery and obfuscation, then a theory that there exists a totally objective publisher, who would consistently publish open data that does not support the treacherous and powerful, is a strained theory.
The point is that JQ doesn't depend on such clear financial data existing in published and public form, nor would justification in believing JQ hinge on whether one has access to that data. Maybe it's clearer now, how the insistence that we provide that specific kind of data actually demonstrates a misunderstanding of JQ. If our theory is true, you wouldn't expect that kind of data to exist publicly; the theory has a good explanation for why: such evidence would be damning, against the very group that wishes to conceal it.
It's just in the nature of secretive and underhanded things to not be the sort of things I can go grab PDF-evidence of, with a couple clicks, just like that. Imagine if some police force depended on catching white collar criminals only by using data published in some public report/journal. What a safe harbor for the white collar criminals! Secrets exist. Conspiracies exist. That is non-controversial. So the real problem here is an epistemological one. It's about your mismatch between JQ and the evidence that would be appropriate for evidencing JQ.
You seem to be demanding evidence that really isn't appropriate for the claim being made. Ideally, it would be good evidence, all else equal. But all else is not equal.
I can demonstrate the inappropriateness of your evidential standards. Take the recent FTX scandal. Almost nobody thinks things were 'above board' with FTX, Ukraine and the Democratic Party. Can you go and fetch the exact documents that prove money laundering occurred? I seriously doubt you can.
"B-b-b-but, FTX publishes financial records. Their records don't show the money laundering occurred. Checkmate!"
Oh, you mean the criminals didn't provide accurate information about their own crimes? Yeah, no shit.
By your standards, nobody should believe anything was 'wrong' about FTX's practices, or any other involved party.
It's simpler than that. Absence of evidence is not evidence of evidence. If one makes a claim Jews run everything and I present evidence strongly indicating the opposite (and I did) the case that massive and overwhelming Jewish wealth exists but is just 'hidden' due to Jews being a bunch of crooks or whatever is little more than a just so story.
The better question, I suppose, is how people ever arrived at this notion Jews have supreme power in the first place. I think it relies on shoddy, superficial impressions - and in some real sense prejudice toward the outgroup.
I can demonstrate the threat the rise of color poses, say. The Jew stuff though is just frequently unconvincing. And for an idea to have explanatory value it has to make sense.
Not necessarily bots. But quite possibly. More like being stupid on purpose to demoralize good faith users. This is textbook COINTELPRO bullshit. And this strategy can be employed with or without bots. The point though is the strategy, not the bots.
The basic idea is to drive off real people with idiocy as they come to think the place is full of morons. In time the place is mostly glowniggers. We may be there already.
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 5 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 07:26:40 ago (+5/-0)
inbred kike filth will always act as if they have a moral right to behave like the utter filth that they are
there is no talking to these people, we need to end their existence in our White countries for the future of our people
[ + ] boogeyman
[ - ] boogeyman 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 11:27:21 ago (+0/-0)
https://files.catbox.moe/e23l7f.png
https://files.catbox.moe/y00siv.png
https://files.catbox.moe/rrnmtp.jpg
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 3 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 09:43:42 ago (+3/-0)
https://i.imgflip.com/72wpd7.jpg
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 09:56:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 3starAgent
[ - ] 3starAgent 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 17:58:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -6 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 02:21:20 ago (+3/-9)*
You are a stupe or a glow. Or both.
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 5 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 07:28:22 ago (+5/-0)
Seriously if we knew where you were IRL you'd be done already kike
now get the fuck out of White America, you kikes are not, and never will be White, or normal, or welcome in our lands ever again
kikes are not jews, calling them that and repeating it won't make it true kike lmfoa hahahahaha...the kike can't even point to contributions kikes didn't steal...filthy kike scum like joe mccarthy are everything they claim not to be
You are a child rapist trying to gaslight people, the only "glow" i see here is coming from you kike filth
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 4 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 09:55:13 ago (+4/-0)*
Question: how reliable is the publication in question?
Hypothetical: let's just grant the things being said about the Jews are true for a moment - call this theory 'JQ'.
Depending on our answers to the other questions, it's possible that we simply shouldn't expect reliable financial data to support JQ.
The issue is not your empiricism, per se; there isn't anything inherently wrong with the notion that (a) if some claim X is true about a financially elite group, then (b) gathering financial data will either prove X or ~X.
But, again, this is about a bigger picture. If the landscape is one of treachery and obfuscation, then a theory that there exists a totally objective publisher, who would consistently publish open data that does not support the treacherous and powerful, is a strained theory.
The point is that JQ doesn't depend on such clear financial data existing in published and public form, nor would justification in believing JQ hinge on whether one has access to that data. Maybe it's clearer now, how the insistence that we provide that specific kind of data actually demonstrates a misunderstanding of JQ. If our theory is true, you wouldn't expect that kind of data to exist publicly; the theory has a good explanation for why: such evidence would be damning, against the very group that wishes to conceal it.
It's just in the nature of secretive and underhanded things to not be the sort of things I can go grab PDF-evidence of, with a couple clicks, just like that. Imagine if some police force depended on catching white collar criminals only by using data published in some public report/journal. What a safe harbor for the white collar criminals! Secrets exist. Conspiracies exist. That is non-controversial. So the real problem here is an epistemological one. It's about your mismatch between JQ and the evidence that would be appropriate for evidencing JQ.
You seem to be demanding evidence that really isn't appropriate for the claim being made. Ideally, it would be good evidence, all else equal. But all else is not equal.
I can demonstrate the inappropriateness of your evidential standards. Take the recent FTX scandal. Almost nobody thinks things were 'above board' with FTX, Ukraine and the Democratic Party. Can you go and fetch the exact documents that prove money laundering occurred? I seriously doubt you can.
"B-b-b-but, FTX publishes financial records. Their records don't show the money laundering occurred. Checkmate!"
Oh, you mean the criminals didn't provide accurate information about their own crimes? Yeah, no shit.
By your standards, nobody should believe anything was 'wrong' about FTX's practices, or any other involved party.
Sometimes we have to use common damn sense.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 15:42:26 ago (+0/-1)*
The better question, I suppose, is how people ever arrived at this notion Jews have supreme power in the first place. I think it relies on shoddy, superficial impressions - and in some real sense prejudice toward the outgroup.
I can demonstrate the threat the rise of color poses, say. The Jew stuff though is just frequently unconvincing. And for an idea to have explanatory value it has to make sense.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 13:07:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 15:56:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 16:49:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 16:58:53 ago (+0/-0)*
The basic idea is to drive off real people with idiocy as they come to think the place is full of morons. In time the place is mostly glowniggers. We may be there already.
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 09:38:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG [op] -1 points 2.5 yearsDec 2, 2022 11:13:11 ago (+0/-1)