×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
6

People are angry at AI generated art when they themselves have done nothing but fuck up art standards for the last 20 years

submitted by Alexiborodin to news 2.4 yearsDec 15, 2022 16:27:15 ago (+6/-0)     (news)

so wait...

lemme get this straight..

you help create a porn addiction for an entire generation , charge them money in nothing short of racketeering type profits charging that you'd only really see outside of brothel type businesses used by the Mafia

ruin western animation and make sure an entire generation is only force fed diversity type shlock made to look like art where furry freaks have tongue nipples and other degenerate shit. These people outsmart you and your (first taste is free) type garbage

you start complaining it isn't "real art" when all you've been doing is selling them various forms of animu and basically nothing else along with people like Rebecca sugar who simply will not admit they are part of this clique that sells porn to children under the guise of childrens cartoons that is cultural Marxism and is made all by pornography marxists who know each other and willingly co-hort and work together to further kill the last bits of spirit of our animation industry as nobody does anything

and you assholes have the audacity to tell me skynet is worse than you cucks ? I'm gonna be real with the blackpill here , I'd rather take skynet any day over some multi profile pronoun kike who is part of art having been distended for years.
if you've read meinkempf you clearly know who these people are and what they've done to pollute art , so it makes little difference. I guess I'm thinking of it from an accelerationist view point


7 comments block


[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 15, 2022 17:16:56 ago (+0/-0)

They are always going to need real artists. The really talented and business saavy artists will always have paid work. AI art will likely still depend on real artists to create the works that the ai draws it's training from.

There's still a demand for pro photographers even though nearly everyone can buy a camera, put it on auto mode, and get some nice photos. Or just use their phone.

There's still a demand for painted and illustrated art even though cameras were invented.

No talent hack artists will either need to evolve, up their game, or embrace ai art at some point.

[ - ] Alexiborodin [op] 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 15, 2022 17:35:40 ago (+1/-0)

Answer me here , is modern or post modern art "real art" ? is anything these triggered multi pronoun niggered shit people have posted "real art" ?

[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 16, 2022 00:00:33 ago (+0/-0)

The problem isn't in the stars. Every dumb girl in school was flattered that her marxist level shit art was worthy. And she told her kids who were twenty years old what a mommy tells her 4 year old about their art.

It's all about the external voice shutting out the inner voice

[ - ] Deathstalker 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 16, 2022 00:18:59 ago (+0/-0)

No one is angry at "AI" art. Fake news. Also image generators are not AI.

[ - ] Wahaha 2 points 2.4 yearsDec 15, 2022 16:31:15 ago (+2/-0)

Modern and post-modern art has been killing art since a hundred years ago.

[ - ] 2Drunk 2 points 2.4 yearsDec 15, 2022 16:50:28 ago (+2/-0)

AI will never be able to spray paint a banana gold and sell it for millions.

[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 15, 2022 17:12:09 ago (+0/-0)

Because george floyd stole the banana [and did an ooga-booga dance with it].