Wanna note incidentally how contrived it comes off to have people repeatedly coming into these threads - often the same males - to say how much they hate naked women.
Of course some of them come off like paid disruptors anyway...
I'm an idea man whatever else I am. I add quality to the site. Lots of it.
Every interaction I have with you is basically you lodging a personal attack, repeated constantly so as to make the libel stick. That is strongly along the lines of textbook disruption as the aim is not so much to prevent 'dangerous' conversations - which I very clearly have and which you very conspicuously avoid bringing up in your defamation - but to prevent any worthwhile conversation at all by wasting time addressing constant personal attacks.
See. You are doing it right now. You're wasting my time. Right now.
And needless to say, griping over posting basic bitch nudity as if it is some existential threat to the platform is stupid. So stupid that I doubt you actually believe what you say. More COINTELPRO bullshit. Zero in on existing community cleavages to create discord. To disrupt.
I'd bet money you are a paid disruptor. Because I know what they do.
You're the only person who talks like that here. My "defamation" of you is factually accurate and you can shove your ideas up your ass.
It wouldn't matter if you had all the greatest ideas, you have shown your colors. You know damn well that I am not a shill, and I definitely don't get paid for it.
Trust me, I'm sicker of you, than you are of me. KYS
Nope. This is all very straightforward. Though your types bend over backwards to avoid discussing it.
This is how counterterrorism works. Target the target. Deny him visibility. Waste his time. Discredit him personally so the audience won't listen to him. Deny him a following. Prevent terrorist groups from even emerging if possible.
But in terrorism prevention you want to avoid actually talking about terrorism. You want to avoid the topic like the plague. For the plain reason that this audience is open to the possibilities of it. The indirect attack is thus chosen. You talk about terrorism without talking about terrorism.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 1 point 2.5 yearsDec 19, 2022 00:41:10 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 18, 2022 23:29:14 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 2.5 yearsDec 19, 2022 01:32:31 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -2 points 2.5 yearsDec 19, 2022 07:40:52 ago (+0/-2)
Of course some of them come off like paid disruptors anyway...
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 1 point 2.5 yearsDec 19, 2022 10:30:40 ago (+1/-0)
This isnt a porn site, everyone likes naked women but this isnt a porn site.
We know this tactic and it isn't new and no one believes you "just like porn" and "want to share"
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 2.5 yearsDec 19, 2022 15:42:59 ago (+0/-1)*
Every interaction I have with you is basically you lodging a personal attack, repeated constantly so as to make the libel stick. That is strongly along the lines of textbook disruption as the aim is not so much to prevent 'dangerous' conversations - which I very clearly have and which you very conspicuously avoid bringing up in your defamation - but to prevent any worthwhile conversation at all by wasting time addressing constant personal attacks.
See. You are doing it right now. You're wasting my time. Right now.
And needless to say, griping over posting basic bitch nudity as if it is some existential threat to the platform is stupid. So stupid that I doubt you actually believe what you say. More COINTELPRO bullshit. Zero in on existing community cleavages to create discord. To disrupt.
I'd bet money you are a paid disruptor. Because I know what they do.
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 1 point 2.5 yearsDec 19, 2022 16:37:36 ago (+1/-0)
My "defamation" of you is factually accurate and you can shove your ideas up your ass.
It wouldn't matter if you had all the greatest ideas, you have shown your colors.
You know damn well that I am not a shill, and I definitely don't get paid for it.
Trust me, I'm sicker of you, than you are of me.
KYS
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 2.5 yearsDec 19, 2022 16:59:51 ago (+0/-1)
This is how counterterrorism works. Target the target. Deny him visibility. Waste his time. Discredit him personally so the audience won't listen to him. Deny him a following. Prevent terrorist groups from even emerging if possible.
But in terrorism prevention you want to avoid actually talking about terrorism. You want to avoid the topic like the plague. For the plain reason that this audience is open to the possibilities of it. The indirect attack is thus chosen. You talk about terrorism without talking about terrorism.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -3 points 2.5 yearsDec 18, 2022 23:12:47 ago (+0/-3)