KABBALAH; from qibbel (to accept) implies ones consent to accept (want) or deny (not want) the suggestions of another, while ignoring to adapt (need) to perceivable.
One represents perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole)...the suggestions from others tempt one to ignore that, while consenting to the suggested over the perceivable, allows others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested (information) as an overlay upon the perceivable (inspiration).
For example...suggested words represent an overlay upon perceivable sound. Those who adhere to sound represent PHOENICIANS, while those who ignore sound for words represent DEAF PHOENICIANS (definitions), hence allowing themselves to be defined by the suggestions of others.
ANGEL aka AN'GLE, noun (Latin angulus, a corner) - "the point where two lines meet"
From etymonline.com: angel: "from Late Latin angelus, from Greek angelos, literally "messenger, envoy, one that announces," in the New Testament "divine messenger".
There is a difference between Latin angElus and angUlus.
MESSENGER, from mitto (to send); ENVOY; from via (way); ANNOUNCE, from annuncio (to deliver)...inception towards death represents the way that sends life as the delivery aka DELIVER, verb - "to free", hence as free will of choice.
Choice represents the point at the center of balance (inception/death), hence the guardian angle/angel (choice) within the provided momentum (balance) of dividing motion. That's why perceiving choice can shape within perceivable symmetry.
There is a difference between Latin angElus and angUlus.
Sameness (whole process of dying) represents the foundation for differentiation (living partials). LAT'IN, from stela- "to spread" or from latere "to lie hidden"...depending on responding choice. Whole (perceivable) impresses upon partial (perceiving), hence spreading KNOWL'EDGE, noun -"perception of that which exists". Ignoring this for suggested gives those suggesting the power to hide the perceivable underneath the suggested.
In short...instead of reasoning (want vs not want) over differences "between" suggested, try implication (if/then) about being different "within" sameness. What if sameness cannot be perceived, only comprehended by partials (different) within whole (same)?
[ + ] Aze
[ - ] Aze 1 point 2.5 yearsDec 26, 2022 11:38:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 2 points 2.5 yearsDec 26, 2022 11:44:42 ago (+2/-0)*
Their inherent angelic natures have merely been modified a bit, but they are still angels.
More importantly, they can present themselves bearing their angelic guises.
[ + ] Bonlio99
[ - ] Bonlio99 1 point 2.5 yearsDec 26, 2022 12:58:22 ago (+1/-0)
Have you ever read the Bible?
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 26, 2022 11:46:55 ago (+0/-0)
a) the process of dying represents the divider (from whole into partial), which provides (everything to everyone) for those living within.
b) life represents the point where inception/death meet, hence the "guardian angle".
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 26, 2022 11:49:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 26, 2022 12:06:17 ago (+0/-0)
One represents perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole)...the suggestions from others tempt one to ignore that, while consenting to the suggested over the perceivable, allows others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested (information) as an overlay upon the perceivable (inspiration).
For example...suggested words represent an overlay upon perceivable sound. Those who adhere to sound represent PHOENICIANS, while those who ignore sound for words represent DEAF PHOENICIANS (definitions), hence allowing themselves to be defined by the suggestions of others.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 26, 2022 12:08:41 ago (+0/-0)
From etymonline.com: angel: "from Late Latin angelus, from Greek angelos, literally "messenger, envoy, one that announces," in the New Testament "divine messenger".
There is a difference between Latin angElus and angUlus.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 26, 2022 12:35:18 ago (+0/-0)
MESSENGER, from mitto (to send); ENVOY; from via (way); ANNOUNCE, from annuncio (to deliver)...inception towards death represents the way that sends life as the delivery aka DELIVER, verb - "to free", hence as free will of choice.
Choice represents the point at the center of balance (inception/death), hence the guardian angle/angel (choice) within the provided momentum (balance) of dividing motion. That's why perceiving choice can shape within perceivable symmetry.
Sameness (whole process of dying) represents the foundation for differentiation (living partials). LAT'IN, from stela- "to spread" or from latere "to lie hidden"...depending on responding choice. Whole (perceivable) impresses upon partial (perceiving), hence spreading KNOWL'EDGE, noun -"perception of that which exists". Ignoring this for suggested gives those suggesting the power to hide the perceivable underneath the suggested.
In short...instead of reasoning (want vs not want) over differences "between" suggested, try implication (if/then) about being different "within" sameness. What if sameness cannot be perceived, only comprehended by partials (different) within whole (same)?
[ + ] gaybeeye
[ - ] gaybeeye 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 26, 2022 13:03:21 ago (+0/-0)