The Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency classifies 16 critical infrastructure sectors “considered so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on security, national economic security, national public health or safety”: the chemical sector, communications, dams, emergency services, financial services, government facilities, information technology, transportation systems, commercial facilities, critical manufacturing, defense industrial base, energy, food and agriculture, healthcare, nuclear reactors/materials, and water and wastewater systems.
"A banner draped from an overpass in Moore County, N.C., a couple weeks after an outage sparked by saboteurs declared “bring it all down” along with neo-Nazi imagery and a link to the neo-Nazi accelerationist National Socialist Resistance Front. After rounds fired at two substations in the county Dec. 3 knocked out power to 40,000 homes and businesses for days, accelerationists cheered the incident and encouraged more attacks on electricity infrastructure. But it was hardly a new call for action: One accelerationist handbook circulated last summer called for shooters to bypass softer targets in favor of causing chaotic blackouts by emulating on a broader scale an unsolved 2013 sniper attack on a California transmission substation. A larger subsequent handbook released by accelerationists contained attack threats, tips, or encouragement directed at critical infrastructure sectors, from short memes to detailed instruction. Their messaging is consistent: Infrastructure attacks from small acts of sabotage to larger and well-supplied team operations can be committed with a range of methods and skill levels, and can deliver blows — accelerationists hope — to stability and continuity while terrorizing the population."
Some of the terrorists that don't exist. The National Socialist Resistance Front for example is Atomwaffen.
There is nothing to associate the "attack" on that substation to that banner drop. A bunch of trannies and faggots said it was because of a drag show that was to be performed that day.
Attomwaffen was (see that word, was) a honey pot for the Feds. Organized by feds, maintained by feds, funded by feds, and those who were dumb enough to join, arrested by feds.
Just like the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers. A bunch of fuckin' feds pulling off bullshit to justify rights violations, population control legislation, and funding for fake terror prevention.
Whether the NC power grid attack was the product of accelerationists is of course an open question - but you're in part very narrowly defining terrorists as those that actually commit violent acts and excluding those that promote it, disseminate info on how to conduct attacks, etc., which is also heavily dealt with there even excluding this Atomwaffen offshoot. This is the kind of really bullshit that no one in the field is going to take seriously. Normie conservatives promote it though of course - and naturally cops will too in front of an audience like this as they wanna tamp down on the idea that there are terrorists at all as they don't want people like those that read this site joining them thinking this revolution business is going places.
And needless to say your 'feds everywhere' narrative is very much in line with this law enforcement neutralization aim. Not a great look for you even putting aside the fact that yours is a shit take otherwise.
Joe, terrorism, by definition, is acts of violence, against innocent people, to push a political agenda. Rhetoric is not terrorism, even if it's scary rhetoric. A call to "bring it all down" is not terrorism. A call to "burn it all down" is not terrorism. Planning acts of terrorism, is not terrorism, nor does it make you a terrorist unless you take an affirmative action to carry out the planned plot.
You're the one trying to twist definitions of words to push a bullshit narrative. A terrorist is someone who commits and act of terror, not someone who wishes an act of terror would occur, not someone who calls for an act of terrorism, and not someone who dreams up some dumb assed way to pull off a terrorist attack, or posts his fantasy online or in a "manifesto".
And, here's the thing, Joe, white supremacist, white nationalists, and those who want to see this system crash and burn, those who really want a civil war, aren't the same people who want innocent people hurt or killed. They aren't going to go out and commit an act of terror against innocent people. This is how you will know if its fake terror or an actual legit group. If the targets are innocent people, even jews, muzzies, niggers, etc., then the most likely perpetrator is a fed or set up by feds. If the target is the police, military, or very specific targets, like Gates, Musk, some rich and powerful jew fuck, some congressman, senator, or judge, then it might be worth considering as a real, non-fed, event.
And, as for your "civil war" bullshit. An actual civil war takes coordination, funding, organization, and leadership. There gas never been a civil war in the history of the world created by lone wolf attacks by groups and individuals with nothing in common other than motive, principal, philosophy, or fantasy. Never. You'll know a civil war is coming when there is a clear rising faction that opposes the current government. Not random attacks by lone wolves on innocent people, but rather coordinated attacks against our current government by a well funded well organized, and well supplied counter faction.
Look at Mexico, right now. It's the Mexican government versus the sinaloa cartel. It's not randos killing Mexicans. It's the cartels killing soldiers, police, and those supporting the government and police, and the Mexican government killing cartel members. This is a civil war.
That terrorism has a broader scope than narrowly tailored actual commission of attacks is obvious just in the Atomwaffen case alone as it is a designated terrorist organization in multiple countries. You'll be considered a terrorist in being a member of an outlawed terror group even if you never so much as swat a fly.
I dunno what I should say to that other stuff. You don't come off well versed in the literature of what constitutes a civil war though or how they start. The mechanics or what goes into it. Suffice it to say opinions vary and intensity and scale can range from something like the Years of Lead in Italy to something on the order of the war in Syria. You don't get to set up your own personal model and say this or that doesn't meet the civil war threshold. Some commentators think we're already in one.
Not that civil war is even really the issue here, and by implication you are seemingly making some assumptions as to my own preferences that are pretty unwarranted. Lower intensity conflicts in the insurgency spectrum can arguably not meet the civil war threshold. Or just sporadic terrorist attacks even. Sporadic attacks alone, depending on targeting and effectiveness, could be enough to flip the table on the system given the current political environment.
Asserting only feds will be the ones apt to target "innocent people" though is something you just pulled from your rectum. There is no basis to assume that at all.
Again, "terrorism" is defined by acts of violence against innocent people to push a political agenda. If no violent action is taken, it's not terrorism. And, you keep pushing Attomwaffen, but we already know that Attomwaffen was fed run. So, the government designating a group that they actively controlled as a "terrorist organization" is nothing more than the federal government pushing fake terror to get increased funding and more legislation passed for greater control over the American people. It's a political stunt. It's not terrorism. And, the government considers parents that protest gender identification taught at schools as "terrorists" but that doesn't make them terrorists. Terrorists are people who commit terrorism, no government designation changes that definition. Again, they are pushing a political agenda to gain increased funding and to call for increased legislation and executive powers over the American people. Their designations aren't a reality, they are part of a fake terror campaign for their own benefit.
You can't have an insurgency campaign without an insurgency, and there is no such thing as a lone wolf insurgency. Nor has there ever been a civil war between a government and a bunch of lone wolf terrorists.
Asserting only feds will be the ones apt to target "innocent people" though is something you just pulled from your rectum. There is no basis to assume that at all.
Nigger, 9-11 was in inside job. OKC was too. Ffs, they are now even admitting the JFK assassination was fed run. Assad never gassed his own people, that was staged and a false flag, so are the attacks in Italy that you mentioned. Operation Gladio. Look it up. The Reisgtagg Fire, false flag. History is replete with false flag terrorist attacks to spur wars. USS Maine. USS Liberty. USS Barbara, in the Gulf of Tonkin. The Bay of Pigs. I could go on for hours with a list of false flag operations run by the ruling governments of a country that were then used as a pretext to demand more authority, more funding, and a crack down against the people. None of it "pulled out of my ass". Fucking pathetic.
Putting aside nuance, caveats, and details it's just standard cop tactics applied to manipulating site tools. Suppress the most dangerous and make the least dangerous most visible. Simple procedure in and of itself.
The hitch is when everyone figures out they are doing it and regards them as the paid liars they are. That time has come. But not before they've driven off a good chunk of what organic accounts were ever here.
Oh damn, it's good to hear that I'm the least dangerous. They'll never see it coming.
I think there's another explanation though. People don't like you. They don't come here to view porn or to organize violent revolution. Everyone knows what's coming eventually, except tallestskil. He thinks nothing will ever happen. Some people just come here for news, memes, and a small sense of community. You are contrary to that.
Tallest gets so irritated because he knows what's coming, and that many things will happen to the cattle. IMO, his main delusion is thinking the people have the capacity to perceive actual reality while living a modern society life.
If there's any kind of revolt, it will be the result of one of the owners deliberately stampeding the herd, as we're seeing in Ukraine. Elensky is a hired minion, but notice how he has immunity from retribution, even though he's culled huge numbers of the Ukrainian herd, and not a small number of Russians.
The people NEVER act on their own. It only happens when the order to "Stampede them!" comes down. Sometimes management needs replacing, sometimes the herd needs to be culled in certain ways.
As for Joe, he kind of grows on you after a while.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -2 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 07:15:44 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] SunDriedjews
[ - ] SunDriedjews 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 14:53:59 ago (+0/-0)
Add https://www.hstoday.us/author/bridgetjohnson/ to the list.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 07:18:14 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -3 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 07:23:58 ago (+0/-3)
Some of the terrorists that don't exist. The National Socialist Resistance Front for example is Atomwaffen.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 07:38:26 ago (+2/-0)
Attomwaffen was (see that word, was) a honey pot for the Feds. Organized by feds, maintained by feds, funded by feds, and those who were dumb enough to join, arrested by feds.
Just like the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers. A bunch of fuckin' feds pulling off bullshit to justify rights violations, population control legislation, and funding for fake terror prevention.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -2 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 07:49:00 ago (+1/-3)*
And needless to say your 'feds everywhere' narrative is very much in line with this law enforcement neutralization aim. Not a great look for you even putting aside the fact that yours is a shit take otherwise.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 08:17:08 ago (+0/-0)
You're the one trying to twist definitions of words to push a bullshit narrative. A terrorist is someone who commits and act of terror, not someone who wishes an act of terror would occur, not someone who calls for an act of terrorism, and not someone who dreams up some dumb assed way to pull off a terrorist attack, or posts his fantasy online or in a "manifesto".
And, here's the thing, Joe, white supremacist, white nationalists, and those who want to see this system crash and burn, those who really want a civil war, aren't the same people who want innocent people hurt or killed. They aren't going to go out and commit an act of terror against innocent people. This is how you will know if its fake terror or an actual legit group. If the targets are innocent people, even jews, muzzies, niggers, etc., then the most likely perpetrator is a fed or set up by feds. If the target is the police, military, or very specific targets, like Gates, Musk, some rich and powerful jew fuck, some congressman, senator, or judge, then it might be worth considering as a real, non-fed, event.
And, as for your "civil war" bullshit. An actual civil war takes coordination, funding, organization, and leadership. There gas never been a civil war in the history of the world created by lone wolf attacks by groups and individuals with nothing in common other than motive, principal, philosophy, or fantasy. Never. You'll know a civil war is coming when there is a clear rising faction that opposes the current government. Not random attacks by lone wolves on innocent people, but rather coordinated attacks against our current government by a well funded well organized, and well supplied counter faction.
Look at Mexico, right now. It's the Mexican government versus the sinaloa cartel. It's not randos killing Mexicans. It's the cartels killing soldiers, police, and those supporting the government and police, and the Mexican government killing cartel members. This is a civil war.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 08:30:33 ago (+1/-1)*
I dunno what I should say to that other stuff. You don't come off well versed in the literature of what constitutes a civil war though or how they start. The mechanics or what goes into it. Suffice it to say opinions vary and intensity and scale can range from something like the Years of Lead in Italy to something on the order of the war in Syria. You don't get to set up your own personal model and say this or that doesn't meet the civil war threshold. Some commentators think we're already in one.
Not that civil war is even really the issue here, and by implication you are seemingly making some assumptions as to my own preferences that are pretty unwarranted. Lower intensity conflicts in the insurgency spectrum can arguably not meet the civil war threshold. Or just sporadic terrorist attacks even. Sporadic attacks alone, depending on targeting and effectiveness, could be enough to flip the table on the system given the current political environment.
Asserting only feds will be the ones apt to target "innocent people" though is something you just pulled from your rectum. There is no basis to assume that at all.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 09:41:41 ago (+0/-0)
You can't have an insurgency campaign without an insurgency, and there is no such thing as a lone wolf insurgency. Nor has there ever been a civil war between a government and a bunch of lone wolf terrorists.
Nigger, 9-11 was in inside job. OKC was too. Ffs, they are now even admitting the JFK assassination was fed run. Assad never gassed his own people, that was staged and a false flag, so are the attacks in Italy that you mentioned. Operation Gladio. Look it up. The Reisgtagg Fire, false flag. History is replete with false flag terrorist attacks to spur wars. USS Maine. USS Liberty. USS Barbara, in the Gulf of Tonkin. The Bay of Pigs. I could go on for hours with a list of false flag operations run by the ruling governments of a country that were then used as a pretext to demand more authority, more funding, and a crack down against the people. None of it "pulled out of my ass". Fucking pathetic.
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 09:52:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 10:00:47 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 10:12:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 10:22:58 ago (+1/-1)
The hitch is when everyone figures out they are doing it and regards them as the paid liars they are. That time has come. But not before they've driven off a good chunk of what organic accounts were ever here.
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 10:43:24 ago (+1/-0)
I think there's another explanation though. People don't like you. They don't come here to view porn or to organize violent revolution. Everyone knows what's coming eventually, except tallestskil. He thinks nothing will ever happen. Some people just come here for news, memes, and a small sense of community. You are contrary to that.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 10:54:28 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 11:05:50 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SunDriedjews
[ - ] SunDriedjews 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 15:26:52 ago (+1/-0)
If there's any kind of revolt, it will be the result of one of the owners deliberately stampeding the herd, as we're seeing in Ukraine. Elensky is a hired minion, but notice how he has immunity from retribution, even though he's culled huge numbers of the Ukrainian herd, and not a small number of Russians.
The people NEVER act on their own. It only happens when the order to "Stampede them!" comes down. Sometimes management needs replacing, sometimes the herd needs to be culled in certain ways.
As for Joe, he kind of grows on you after a while.