I think if you were going to execute a depopulation program you wouldn’t just kill of 80% immediately, especially if you wanted to retain power of any functioning system. You have to do it over a long period of time, and you couldn’t make it obvious even though it is for those paying attention.
Seems like a lot of misinformation about the whole thing but the whole depopulation program is more complex than it leads on to be. I personally believe it is a multipronged approach and it has much more to do with basic economics.
First THERE IS a biological weapon that we call Covid-19 which was released from the wuhan lab. Second the vaccines are deadly, just as covid is, but not as bad as you think or are lead to believe especially by the likes of Alex jones and that media sphere.
Let’s say liberally that covid killed off ~1%, excess deaths not attributed directly to covid increase and kill off ~3%, the vaccines kill of another ~1%, on top off natural death and other causes, throw in a couple wars, famines and you’d be somewhere in the range of depopulating ~10%. (Rough math here).
In regard to vaccine deaths, you probably have to have a plethora of health problems before either one will kill you, or put immense strain on your body in the case of athletes. It won’t kill the majority of the heard, just the already sick and unhealthy. Add into all that the toxicity in food, water, air - lower life expectancy, fertility, etc., and the depopulation has been working long before covid.
Back to the economics… Imagine the stock market is going to tank ~20% over a period of time, if you reduce the population ~10-20% it would lessen the burden that the global gdp needs to support the population, this would obviously be of benefit the markets and the power structure.
TLDR: they will kill off 10-20% of the population by various means, vaccine apocalypse is another disinformation ploy to divide people and make them appear irrational. It’s always about economics.
[ + ] Taxedtv
[ - ] Taxedtv 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 09:23:02 ago (+0/-0)
Seems like a lot of misinformation about the whole thing but the whole depopulation program is more complex than it leads on to be. I personally believe it is a multipronged approach and it has much more to do with basic economics.
First THERE IS a biological weapon that we call Covid-19 which was released from the wuhan lab. Second the vaccines are deadly, just as covid is, but not as bad as you think or are lead to believe especially by the likes of Alex jones and that media sphere.
Let’s say liberally that covid killed off ~1%, excess deaths not attributed directly to covid increase and kill off ~3%, the vaccines kill of another ~1%, on top off natural death and other causes, throw in a couple wars, famines and you’d be somewhere in the range of depopulating ~10%. (Rough math here).
In regard to vaccine deaths, you probably have to have a plethora of health problems before either one will kill you, or put immense strain on your body in the case of athletes. It won’t kill the majority of the heard, just the already sick and unhealthy. Add into all that the toxicity in food, water, air - lower life expectancy, fertility, etc., and the depopulation has been working long before covid.
Back to the economics… Imagine the stock market is going to tank ~20% over a period of time, if you reduce the population ~10-20% it would lessen the burden that the global gdp needs to support the population, this would obviously be of benefit the markets and the power structure.
TLDR: they will kill off 10-20% of the population by various means, vaccine apocalypse is another disinformation ploy to divide people and make them appear irrational. It’s always about economics.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 00:44:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Lordbananafist
[ - ] Lordbananafist 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 00:10:09 ago (+0/-0)
You understand that television is made by television producers and there aren’t little people in an electric box in your trailer right?