I saw reddit "experts" in the wild. Claiming there's nothing wrong with the feed. There's been no change, etc. Pretty suspicious. Why would ag PhD niggers out themselves?
If it results in more chicken farmers buying organic feed instead of the bioengineered stuff, that's probably good. I mean it's more expensive, but at least we will have eggs.
It has been observed that 1960s-1970s Malthusianism was inaccurate because modern agriculture was able to increase output from the same land. How much of this is a result of pumping animals and plants for more than they are naturally worth? At the same time, monocultures have been created. The agriculture is fragile, and when interruptions happen people in the poorest parts of the Earth starve. So who's to say we aren't beyond our carrying capacity now? We are abusing the planet, and our practices don't seem sustainable, so is the population supported by them?
All I am saying is learning about "enhanced" chicken feed among GMO crops and other types of things made me wonder if the planet could meet its food needs without them. Whatever someone is doing to sabotage the food supply is totally different than this.
[ + ] BoomerChristCuckFinalForm
[ - ] BoomerChristCuckFinalForm 0 points 2.4 yearsFeb 2, 2023 13:13:01 ago (+2/-2)
Old games being played here.
Being horrified and at the same time, being too demoralized to do anything about it is called...
*BEING A FAGGOT*
(Looks at plans for chicken coop)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 2.4 yearsFeb 2, 2023 15:37:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 2 points 2.4 yearsFeb 2, 2023 16:29:27 ago (+2/-0)
If it results in more chicken farmers buying organic feed instead of the bioengineered stuff, that's probably good. I mean it's more expensive, but at least we will have eggs.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.4 yearsFeb 2, 2023 18:28:09 ago (+0/-0)
Reddit seriously damages brains leaving everyone who visits marked for life.
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus -2 points 2.4 yearsFeb 2, 2023 16:34:51 ago (+1/-3)
It has been observed that 1960s-1970s Malthusianism was inaccurate because modern agriculture was able to increase output from the same land. How much of this is a result of pumping animals and plants for more than they are naturally worth? At the same time, monocultures have been created. The agriculture is fragile, and when interruptions happen people in the poorest parts of the Earth starve. So who's to say we aren't beyond our carrying capacity now? We are abusing the planet, and our practices don't seem sustainable, so is the population supported by them?
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 2 points 2.4 yearsFeb 2, 2023 18:32:05 ago (+2/-0)
Good. Stop supporting niggers.
Not us, jews and niggers. Whites, when left alone, tend to their lands and ensure it prospers.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.4 yearsFeb 2, 2023 19:49:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 1 point 2.4 yearsFeb 2, 2023 18:29:27 ago (+1/-0)
Your enemies are deliberately burning farms. Stealing farms. Passing laws banning food production.
Scaring people with fake climate science.
But you think food supply issues are fucking natural?
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.4 yearsFeb 2, 2023 22:55:02 ago (+0/-0)