Our tribes came from somewhere... 53,000 years ago. The story of our people is not the same as the (((people))) in the (((Bible))). We weren't wandering around in the desert chopping off our dicks at the end of the Bronze Age Collapse. Those were Sand-Niggers. Not us. We weren't in the Bible. We were off doing our own thing. You should be more concerned about what your ancestors were doing and less concerned with the affairs of (((Sand-Niggers))).
White peoples dominated the entire globe 10,000 years ago, and there is evidence and legends describing white peoples and their feats by nearly everyone. Maybe you stayed in a hole, you (((sandnigger)))
If your ancestry is from the British Isles, Nordic countries, Germany, or France, your ancestry is separated from that of the people of the bible by 10,000+ years. The people of the middle east may have had lighter skin 10,000+ years ago than they do today, but there's still a lot of distance between us, and the stories in the bible are not the stories of our ancestors. If you're from a Mediterranean or eastern European background you may be separated by less time or had more ancestors who interacted with the people in the bible (such as Greeks and Romans), but the myths are still from the perspective of another tribe, not your own.
The Adamic race had many waves of migration from of the levant & Caucus mountain regions from as early as 2000 bc, at least in any significance to leave a record or evidence. Many cousin tribes who had left the area before they were called Hebrews.
The stories of Joseph and Moses were most likely from roughly 1300 BC. See Akhenaten who attempted to impose monotheism in Egypt, the most candidate for the Pharaoh of Joseph's story in Genesis, and the era of his rule and immediately after was largely scrubbed from history due to a major social upheaval (see the curses placed on his grandson Tut's sealed tomb). Whatever common ancestry the people of northern Europe may share with the people of ancient Israel/Judea, it is from thousands of years prior to the stories of Joseph and Moses, the progenitors of the ancient jews, and therefore the biblical tales are not the tales of your ancestors.
That's partially true, but doesn't tell the complete story.
For instance, the founders of Troy came "out of Egypt" and then later went on to found Rome and Wales (which is why many Roman Royals were British: royal blood. Constantine's mother...)
Pagan Celts who lived all over europe, then Pagan Angles/Saxons from Germany (@450AD), then Pagan Vikings from scandinavia (@700ishAD) who couldnt completely wipe out the pagan Vikings, then Normans from Normandy (france) (@900AD) which were converted Vikings also from scandinavia who went over to england and buttfucked their still pagan Viking cousins AND their still pagan Anglo-Saxons and made the whole fucking place Christian before 1100 and the rest, as they say, is history.
The gods you think you believe in got assblasted away a millenia ago and fuck all remains but half legible runestones.
I mean you can argue but that shit is the written history of about 7 different fucking nations who were all trying to kill each other.
And thats not even taking into account the Christians who wiped the pagan celts off the face of Ireland 600 years before England was unified by Christians (plus Kievan Rus (Proto Russia), Sicily (Proto Italy), East and West Francia aka Proto France and Proto Germany)
Either way, your gods failed you and became my ancient ancestors. Dont get me wrong we wouldnt be were we were without those long extinct people but you know, it is what it is.
So, what, you became a jew because jews converted your people to jew worship? You're no longer the descendant of the tribes that the people of northern and western Europe descended from because your people got converted?
Pagans brought us to the brink of the industrial revolution twice before jews fucked it up and destroyed their civilizations from within both times, and it took over 1000 years for christians to get there again. The jews were so afraid of Paganism that they destroyed as many of the records as they could. Sure, Paganism lost - so did Hitler. But the world would be a better place if Paganism had won and destroyed the jews.
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 16:09:41 ago (+1/-0)
Who the fuck would downvote that? Unless I just don’t know you and you’ve been a huge fag elsewhere, even some staunch Christian that totally disagrees with you, has no good reason to downvote that particular comment. If it is just Christian’s, they should be ashamed their faith means so little to them, that they can’t engage a non Christian at that level, that’s being entirely calm and rational.
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 23:40:19 ago (+1/-0)
Are these legends your only evidence?
And would you care if you found out we weren’t in any of those empires? Like do you think less of our people if we weren’t the ones that built the pyramids?
Your ancestors weren't in Europe during the last Ice-age. It ended 12,000 years ago and we migrated back. Did you think the ancient Empires on the African Continent were niggers ... or sand niggers?
Jews. Never said anything about the ice age. I'm talking about common ancestors. And the common ancestor for haplotypes correlated with Europeans and haplotypes correlated with Jews. The common ancestor is 53,000 years ago.
Moving doesn't change your Y Haplotype. I'm not even sure what point you are trying to make. The last common ancestor between Europeans and Jews was 53,000 years ago. There isn't even an argument to be had once we establish this point.
Right, so some of our brothers couldve been in the levant writing the bible back then. Those authors were certainly different than those creators of the talmud.
There was never an ice-age and there was no 12,000 years ago, stop believing their lies. Millions of years is about as real as anthropogenic climate change and the pandemic.
Lol What % of people downvoting something like this do you think just don’t like you? Like look at the replies, there’s no argument whatsoever.
I disagree but at least understand when Christian’s just get offended when you paste “Christ cuck” all over a post. But how the fuck can any white person argue that we should be more focused on our ancestors then the heebs? Doesn’t even mean you have to accept or believe in our ancestors gods (I don’t), but how can they actually disagree that they should know it?
Of course the Christ-Cucks don't like me. I stab at the very core of their self-identity. It's a natural reaction for someone who isn't in control of themselves.
The important thing to consider is, Christ-Cucks don't get mad that we call them Christ-Cucks. It's like calling someone a NiggerFaggot, who cares? ... Unless you are literally a Nigger who is a Faggot and is ashamed of himself. They REALLY get mad when they get called a NiggerFaggot. ... Likewise with the Christ-Cuck. They know deep down that they give power to a foreign Heroic-Epic which enslaves them and their own people, so, like the Nigger who is a Faggot, they must derail the conversation without ever addressing their own culpability in the matter.
No shit. From Europe. The Proto-Indo-Europeans came out of the Pontic Steppe, had babies with the Early European Farmers, and modern Europeans were born.
You think it’s either we’re 1st cousins of the Jews and share every uncle and grandfather, and everything in the Bible is correct because Heebs wrote it, or we came from monkeys?
Jews tell each other they are wrong constantly. It's all they ever do is kvetch with each other. Jews arguing with each other is not a valid reason for a self-respecting White man to worship a Jew as his Messiah. But, it is something a traitorous White person would do.
The whole question - which is frequently debated around here - is really rather beside the point anyway. What is true or divine is not dependent on ancestry. People that look at religion that way have a hollow perception.
And though there is reason to study European paganism - which no one here does seriously - it is mostly as an anthropological exercise in gaining a broader understanding of white culture. Even most neo-pagans don't seriously believe the old gods exist.
Gonna partly disagree here. If it can be proven that Jesus was both real and opposed to the progenitors of modern day judaism, then Christians can at least be allies even if it's weird that they worship some other tribe's version of god. If, however, Jesus was part of the same tribe, and his ministry was part of a performance to create a golem religion that "opposes" jews the same way muslims do, then christians are dangerous golems and our people need to be freed from its Abrahamic control scheme.
The jews who control our world seem to take the divine/spiritual realm pretty seriously. Most of them practice kaballah, freemasonry, satanism, or some similar occult system. They don't just put predictive programming out there constantly, they also put judaic, masonic, saturnian, and other forms of occult symbolism out there constantly, particularly in works that are predictive. Paganism began to decline when the jews began to spread the belief that the gods were metaphorical and not real in some sense (even if many of the myths are allegorical rather than literal). One of the mantras of the mystical secret societies that rule the world is "as above, so below". What you worship affects what happens in reality. If you give your belief to the god of Abraham, you give your belief to a god that believes its chosen tribe deserves to rule all other tribes. If you give your belief to Wotan, you give your belief to a god who honors the men who protect and provide for northern European people and the women who nurture and raise the future of our people.
[ - ] Not_C 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 20:07:35 ago (+4/-3)
The only 3 facts that need to be said on the subject are -
- Jesus is a God and therefore does not have a human race or human ethnicity. To claim Jesus was a Jew is to deny he is a God.
- Jesus practised Christianity, not Judaism. Someone has to be extremely stupid to not know this.
- Jesus was born of the House of David through the technicality of his step-dad. The Messiah had to be born of the House of David to fulfil the prophesy. Mary was pregnant before she met Joseph. They married before Jesus was born. The prophesy was fulfilled through a technicality and Jesus' only link to the House of David is through this technicality.
That's the part people miss. He was placed in Mary by God. There's no reason to believe he shared any of her genetics. Being God trumps....well.... pretty much everything.
You don't get it. There are two genealogies of (((Jesus))) in the (((Bible))). One through (((Mary))), and one through (((Joseph))). Why? Because prophecy dictates that the foretold (((Messiah))) must be descended from (((David))). So, either (((Jesus))) is genetically NULL, and the he isn't the (((Messiah))) because he isn't descended from (((David))), or the prophecy itself is bullshit, in which case, the prophecy being a part of the (((Bible))) is the unerring word of God, is wrong and all of Christianity is bullshit.
Actually, he understands that important part of the bible better than most Christians.
And the point is this: Jesus is NOT Yahweh. He was a man who is our Brother, not our God to worship. Praise his actions redeeming us, be grateful, but your God of the Covenant is Jesus' Father as he is also our Father. Jesus was just who Yahweh chose to be the spotless lamb, and was chosen from a worthy family of a good and prophesied lineage.
Do you deny John 1:18? You don't believe Titus 2:13
Jesus is God. God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost. 1 John 5:7
Jesus was born of a virgin. Mary was of the line of David. His adopted father was also of the line of David. Therefore, He is of the line of David. Nothing says that He has any genetic material from Mary. He was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of a virgin.
He is God. He can do as He pleases. I believe in Him and I believe 1 Timothy 1:4 and Titus 3:9.
No I am neither. Just a simple Follower of the word of God. The 66 books ... at least.
Jesus was of the Tribe of Judah, in the line directly from David. This only means genealogy. You must believe even that, right? Why else would genealogy matter so much? Sure they can be the subject of vain conversations and arguments, especially in a world so far removed from those lines as to nearly be lost to time, but why were they in the bible in the first place, and the subject of promises from Yahweh? If you think these discussions cloud the Message rather than reveal it, then you are brainwashed.
Paul was writing to the Northern Tribes, who were divorced from Yahweh. Judahs perversion angered God who then used Jesus' Sacrifice to graft back in the wild branches of Hebrews, then using them to reach the Judahites.
Don't pick out verses at me. Read the whole thing.
For a heathen, you understand this fact more than the vast majority of Christians. Great point. I'm grateful you aren't arguing from complete ignorance.
1. Jesus was descended from both Israelites and Judeans (as acknowledged in the link), making him part jew. 2. The Israelites and Judeans believed in the same prophets and had similar versions of many of the same myths. 3. Jesus' adoptive father Joseph (and the historian who may have made them up, Josephus) are named after Joseph from Genesis. Joseph was the one who first fulfilled the Abrahamic blessing by placing Egypt under Abrahamic control, thus beginning the long war for independence from Abrahamics.
I'd be interested to see genetic evidence of differences between ancient Israelites and Judeans to see which one modern jews are more closely related to, though.
I'm desputing any of the 13 Tribes of Israel remained in judea after the death of Jesus. At least in any meaningful amount as to be a part of the dna of the region.
Does Ashkenazi DNA resemble that of the Welsh? No? Well then Ashkenazi DNA is not close to that of the Hebrews.
The argument you have just made makes no sense, unless you want to explain where/who the DNA came from. Are they using 2000+ year old DNA?
What evidence do you have that the Welsh came from the middle east within the 3300 years since Joseph and Moses? The idea that the Welsh are descended from the people that the torah was about is absurd, whereas there are mizrahi jews whose ancestors have been in what was once Israel and Judea for 2000+ years. ashkenazi and mizrahi jews are closely genetically related, but welsh and mizrahi jews are not closely related.
Their histories claiming Joseph of Arimathea came there in 34 AD (with the family of Jesus, fleeing Judea) and planted Churches telling the Gospel. Previously, The prophet Jeremiah was in Ireland planting churches 50 years before. The Brittons and Scotians were Christian or Yahwehists before the Roman Empire. Christians in the Apostolic ways: never catholic.
The vatican and London have tried to stamp out the welsh language, because it is the oldest surviving language in the world, and it's histories tell the tales that people wouldn't even believe in today's society. Welsh language is the key to the Etruscans and Egyptian Hieroglyphs ... and probably ancient Hebrew.
Absolutely absurd - the genetics of the welsh are majority celtic with a mix of a few other northern and western European groups with no significant middle eastern admixture. There was no significant Judean migration to the British Isles 2000 years ago.
Welsh DNA is not close to modern middle-easterners .. yes, thats what Ive been saying. Youre the one saying we can compare ancient Hebrew DNA by studying that of modern middle easterners. I'm telling you that that method isn't sufficient because the hebrews moved out, they white-flighted 2000 - 4000 years ago.
get it? It's not absurd, its what Europeans believed up until the last several hundred years. It's why our entire race converted to Christianity quite quickly. Our WHOLE race.
Your arguments are getting increasingly absurd, so I'm gonna end with this - there are clear evolutionary reasons why the people of ancient Judea/Israel would have evolved into a merchant class with very different traits from northern and western Europeans once our ancestors diverged a minimum of 6000 years and probably more like 10000+ years ago.
Judea/Israel is in the middle east where the Mediterranean and the seas that lead to the Indian Ocean meet. If you wanted to move goods from the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean, you had to pass through either Egypt or Judea, unloading the goods and reloading them onto a boat in the other ocean. If you wanted to move goods by land from Egypt/North Africa into Arabia, Asia Minor, or India, you had to pass through Judea. If you were moving goods from Arabia or India into Europe, Judea was generally the most convenient trade route to pass through. Thus the Judeans evolved to be merchants due to being in a central location where multiple land and sea trade routes all met up in one place. When you look at the jewish talent for language and finance, it makes sense that modern jews would have descended from a people who spent thousands of years evolving to be mercantile.
Compare that to northern and western Europeans who have light skin and who are about the most forward thinking, responsible people on Earth. Our ancestors evolved in cold climates with harsh winters that they had to prepare for, thus forcing them to evolve into the type of people who plan ahead and value productivity. Judea/Israel has very mild winters, not the kind you have to stockpile resources for as you do in much of Europe. The further west and north you are in Europe, the fewer trade routes pass through your land, and thus the less mercantile your people evolved to be. The Brits didn't become a mercantile empire until a few hundred years ago when jewish bankers like the Rothschilds took over their economy, and the Nords are still among the least mercantile people on Earth.
Khazaria is a bit of a mix - less of a trade hub than Judea but more of one than the Nordic countries or British Isles. Some land trade routes from Europe into Asia passed through there but the Black Sea is the dead end of Mediterranean sea routes and most sea trade from Europe would have stopped in Asia Minor rather than going up to the Black Sea, so they'd have evolved a little bit of merchant traits but not nearly as much as people from Judea. Khazar was and still is known as one of the most fertile farming regions on Earth, and the jews are not known for being particularly good at farming. Thus there is no reason to assume that people native to Ukraine/Khazar are the primary forefathers of modern jews - more likely jews from Judea who evolved to be tricksy merchants moved in and took over their ruling class so they could exploit the Slavic peasant farmers.
Modern jews being descended from Judean merchants who spent thousands of years profiting from the exchange of goods between many different eastern and western nations makes perfect evolutionary sense. Modern jews being descended from the native people of what's now Ukraine makes very little sense without Judean admixture. Modern Welsh, Brits, and other western and northern European peoples being primarily or significantly descended from Judean merchants makes no sense. Your bullshit is absolutely absurd jewish lies to make you accept their holy books.
I’ve heard a little bit of reference to Josephus for different reasons, but never looked him up. Is that the claim, that Josephus is supposed to have been the adopted father of Jesus?
No, Josephus was a historian, and the only historian to have mentioned anyone from the gospels in his work within 100 years or so of when the events would have taken place, and he was writing 30ish years after Jesus would have died. If he made up the Jesus story then he likely chose the name Joseph for Jesus' father for its symbolic value.
In the fourth sentence the author states " Jesus was also a direct descendant of Judah through David." Descendant of Judah, that makes him a jew. He was also a native of Judea, which also would cause Him to rightly be called a jew.
The people who are NOT Jews are the modern day usurpers who call themselves Jews.
So when we talk about today's "Jews" we are just using the name they falsely claim a right to.
They are spiritual descendants of the Christ-hating jew religious leaders, scribes and pharisees who had Jesus killed, but ethnically they are a russo-turkic blend from a kingdom that once inhabited what is now Ukraine called Khazaria, that converted to Judaism around 700 AD(or CE if you're a faggot.)
So the author is wrong in one sense and right in two others.
Wrong that Jesus was not a Jew, ethnically, He clearly was, and there no way to debate that. He's literally a descendant of the man from whom the word "jew" derives.
But right that Jesus is not a jew in the sense the modern not even really Jews but claim to be jews are. And right in the sense that, while He followed the old testament law of God given through Moses, He did not practice the corrupt Judaism of the pharisees that has evolved into the Judaism of today.
Beyond that the author makes some retarded claims, like that the evil Jews of the new Testament were not Israelites and his reasoning is full retard. He says " But a passage in John proves that the Jews were not Israelites since they told Jesus that they had never been in bondage.22 Of course, the Israelites had been held as slaves in Egypt.23 Those were Edomite Jews to whom Jesus was speaking."
Some stupid crap they spouted while arguing with their creator has zero impact on the fact that they were literally born of the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi, and to a much lesser extent there was blood from all the other tribes mixed in. They were 100% Israelites ETHNICALLY.
But as the scripture says, "They are not all Israel that are called Israel." and more importantly:
"And if ye are Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, heirs according to promise"
Genetically, the Khazarian jews did share ancestry with the sephardic and other branches of the jewish tree. Acting like the Khazars were a different race because the jews mixed in with the ruling class just enough to take it over is disingenuous.
Since you acknowledge that Jesus was a jew according to what jews were at the time, it's just a question of whether the non-pharisaic jewish religion at the time was good and true or evil and subversive. The Abrahamic blessing gave Joseph the justification to conquer Egypt through trickery, and Jesus came to fulfill the blessing of Abraham. Even without the pharisees' corrupting influence, judaism was still about jews thinking they have the right to rule everyone else.
The sephardim are just the khazar convert fake jews that went to Spain instead of Germany or am I as retarded as your second paragraph?
Jesus was a Jew because He was a direct descendant of Judah. He was not a practitioner of the corrupted religion of Judaism, whether pharisaic or otherwise, but did obey the Old Testament laws given by God, some of which the pharisees and other sects did also.
The Abrahamic blessing never gave anyone the right to be shady. Joseph rose to power in Egypt through integrity, honesty, and diligent work, and the blessings of God that those bring. And he served Pharaoh faithfully and wildly successfully causing Pharaoh to end up owning basically all the land in Egypt that had been owned by the rich among the people prior to the famine.
The fact that Judaism has always been corrupt we seem to agree on. Because they, like you, have twisted concepts like the Abrahamic blessing to justify their wicked desires.
God said HE would bless them if they were faithful to Him, and they instead worshipped other Gods, sacrificed children, and did all manner of wickedness and so God said that "The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof."
He also said that Abraham's seed and heir to the promise is Christ Himself and those that are spiritually in Christ. Look up "replacement theology" for an inkling of the scripturally very plain and obvious doctrine. The New Testament is replete with passages explaining that PHYSICAL ISRAEL was no longer SPIRITUALLY ISRAEL. That the natural branch has been cut off and the wild branch grafted in. That they are not all Israel who are of Israel. That Abraham's seed are those who believe Christ.
Have you even read the thing? And if so, have you read the King James or Geneva or Tyndale or any of the early translations before Christ-haters "found" aleph and b in the 1800's and published fake "bibles" based on those frauds that contradict 1800 years of received text?
The Abrahamic blessing has been passed on to the trickster and deceiver since Jacob. That alone invalidates your entire response.
Even if you take the Joseph story at face value and can't read between the lines to see the obvious pattern of a jew lying about a coming ecological disaster and boom and bust economic cycles to take political and economic control of a country, there's still the fact that Egypt wasn't his country. What the fuck was some jew refugee doing taking control of a country that wasn't his? Why was Joseph, a non-Egyptian, the most powerful person in Egypt? The pattern of a poor jewish refugee fleeing to a new country only to take it over and become its leader starts with Joseph, and just like today he was followed by future generations of jews who looted the country and destroyed it with manmade catastrophes, plagues, and genocide, all because Egypt didn't want to be ruled by foreigners.
If you support Joseph and Moses, you support jews going into countries that aren't their own, becoming the ruling class, and then genociding the population if they resist. That is the story of Joseph and Moses. And you believe that Jesus is the true inheritor of their legacy.
Also the mizrahi jews have been in the middle east for 2000+ years, and they are linked genetically to both sephardic and ashkenazi jews.
The Abrahamic blessing has been passed on to the trickster and deceiver since Jacob. That alone invalidates your entire response.
Okay name one other person the Bible portrays as being blessed by God for trickery than Jacob that doesn't require making stuff up in your head like you did with Joseph. Reading between the lines rather than just trusting the plain words of the Bible is what someone does when they don't actually believe the Bible, and if you don't believe the Bible what can you even claim to know about any of this?
But even more importantly even Jacob wasn't blessed for his trickery! If you deny that then explain why Jacob was chastened for the rest of his life while Esau lived like a king. Why God punished Jacob harshly for his trickster ways causing him to be the one to get fooled and toil for fourteen years to earn the hand of his beloved and halfway through get stuck with her homely sister who caused nothing but drama for the rest of his life? And had him trembling in fear for decades that his brother was going to murder him if he ever saw his face again. And why, during their lifetimes Jacob had nothing but pain, and drama and Esau had nothing but earthly plenty and became great, while Jacob lost his beloved son, thinking him dead and grieving it until in his very old age? The message of Jacob is not that God condones trickery, but that once he's promised you something he's going to deliver it, no matter how much you prove you don't deserve it. And that speaks to the nature of salvation, once you "confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved" no matter what you do to prove you're still a sinner you'll still be saved, but being saved doesn't save you from having a really hard life because of your sins. "For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth."
Even if you take the Joseph story at face value and can't read between the lines to see the obvious pattern of a jew lying about a coming ecological disaster and boom and bust economic cycles to take political and economic control of a country, there's still the fact that Egypt wasn't his country. What the fuck was some jew refugee doing taking control of a country that wasn't his? Why was Joseph, a non-Egyptian, the most powerful person in Egypt? The pattern of a poor jewish refugee fleeing to a new country only to take it over and become its leader starts with Joseph, and just like today he was followed by future generations of jews who looted the country and destroyed it with man-made catastrophes, plagues, and genocide, all because Egypt didn't want to be ruled by foreigners.
Of course I take the Word of God at face value, only what the Bible calls "the simple" or "the fool" does not. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt that they are the uninformed or accidentally misinformed simple rather than the willfully ignorant fool when I talk to them. And regarding why Joseph was in Egypt? Did you not read the story? The aforementioned lifetime of drama Jacob created caused him to end up a slave but because Joseph did “Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. “In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.” God kept his promise and blessed him radically abundantly and as I described in my previous response he was like the goose that laid golden eggs for Pharaoh, causing Pharaoh to prospers immensely in the midst of worldwide famine of all things! And because Joseph did God's will the people he loved and forgave received a portion of the blessing that was on Joseph, but again only after many years of earthly suffering for their own disobedience to God.
If you support Joseph and Moses, you support jews going into countries that aren't their own, becoming the ruling class, and then genociding the population if they resist. That is the story of Joseph and Moses. And you believe that Jesus is the true inheritor of their legacy.
God through Joseph brought Egypt to new heights, later God through Moses brought them back to their knees. Both are God's prerogatives. The fact that fake jews twist scripture to justify their subversive khazarian trickery means nothing except that they are heaping damnation upon themselves.
Also the mizrahi jews have been in the middle east for 2000+ years, and they are linked genetically to both sephardic and ashkenazi jews.
Ok so let's say we agreed that modern "jews" are really descendant of Jacob, even though they're mostly white looking and have a high percentage of blue eyes. It means nothing because the whole New Testament that the promises of God are on the spiritual descendants of Abraham, not the physical, and that means believers in Christ.
And further who even cares about the sephardim or mizrahi? They are not the ones that own everything and run everything the "jews" people on here are always talking about are like 99.9% Ashkenazi.
Look man I don't care about winning an argument on the internet I just care about people knowing and believing the truth and the truth is right there in the plain Word of God and while there are inferences to be drawn from His Word, if you trust human inference more than the plain words of God, it's not gonna end well for you.
Okay name one other person the Bible portrays as being blessed by God for trickery than Jacob
Abraham who lied to Pharaoh and profited greatly from it.
But even more importantly even Jacob wasn't blessed for his trickery!
He received the blessing of Abraham, and however well off Esau was at the time, Esau's line is now "Amalek" while Jacob's line received the blessing of Abraham and was granted rulership over the earth when Jesus came to fulfill the Abrahamic blessing by tricking other nations into worshiping and obeying jews.
Of course I take the Word of God at face value, only what the Bible calls "the simple" or "the fool" does not.
How is it simplistic or foolish to read between the lines, but not simplistic or foolish to believe jews at face value? If I believed everything the jews say without thinking deeper about it, I'd be vaccinated for covid, support nuclear war with Russia after freaking out that Trump was gonna start non-nuclear war with Iran, blame Muslims for 9/11 but blame us for bombing them and demand we take in refugees, and believe that the holocaust was about gas chambers and not about fire bombing Dresden. Just as I don’t have to be a marxist to know that marxism is bad, I don’t have to worship jews to know that you shouldn’t trust a book written by jews and pushed onto non-jews.
With that in mind, let's look at the Joseph story. First off, there's no clear parallel in Egyptian history that fits the story as written, no tales about a beloved foreign advisor to the Pharaoh who worked his way up from slavery and saved the land by planning ahead for a multi-year famine. There's also no clear parallel to the Moses story. The closest parallel we find is Pharaoh Akhenaten, who tried to impose monotheism on Egypt. Akhenaten was anti-masculinity, treated his queen Nefertiti as an equal co-ruler, and all artwork depicting him shows him with frail arms, manboobs, and wide hips, whereas nearly all other Pharaohs were depicted with bulky arms and pecs. His one god Aten was described as “mother and father to all people”, thus being hermaphroditic as well as the closest thing to monotheism at the time. He pushed for a lot of weird, unnatural changes to the art style of Egypt, including drawing people with cone heads and spindly limbs (who else pushes weird art to change culture?). His reign was a disaster, and he was eventually forced to flee from his palace and build a new capital city as a refuge from mass protests against his reforms. Plague swept through Egypt during his reign, killing three of Akhenaten's children. Much of the historical record of his reign was intentionally destroyed, his tomb was mostly unadorned, and his grandson Tut, who destroyed his monotheistic faith and restored Egypt to its original Paganism before passing the line of succession to a family that had not been cursed by Akhenaten’s blood, had a cursed tomb that seemingly inflicted a plague on the first group of explorers who entered it. If there was a period where monotheistic Abrahamics rose to power in Egypt but then lost power and were driven from the country, leaving plagues in their wake, it would have been the Akhenaten to Tut era, and the Egyptian version of that story (for which there is still far more concrete evidence than the jewish version even though much of the historical evidence was destroyed) is that a crazy monotheistic couple took over Egypt, tried to destroy its native culture through gender bullshit, weird art, and destroying its native religion, and saw their country ravaged by popular uprisings and plagues which forced them and their followers to flee and hide from their own subjects. That is as close as you will get to an Egyptian version of Joseph and Moses because neither the Joseph nor Moses story gives any clear indication of which Pharaohs they were dealing with, nor do the events coincide with anything in Egyptian history unless you realize that you’re dealing with lying kikes who are giving you their very biased side of a story that played out very differently.
So no, I will not simply take the jew book at its word, because it does not conform to any historical reality and is clearly a biased work written by the most dishonest and immoral tribe in human history.
God through Joseph brought Egypt to new heights, later God through Moses brought them back to their knees.
Egypt was already a great nation before Joseph arrived. What right did a foreign god have to take over and then destroy another nation? If you believe in ethno-nationalism, shouldn’t you look at the story of Joseph becoming de-facto ruler of Egypt as a bad thing since ethno-nationalism means not having to be ruled by people of another ethnic group?
And further who even cares about the sephardim or mizrahi? They are not the ones that own everything and run everything the "jews" people on here are always talking about are like 99.9% Ashkenazi.
Sephardic and Mizrahi jews still support the jew power structure – see sephardic jew AOC pushing the marxist narrative for one obvious example, or the Wahhabi leaders of Saudi Arabia who are mostly descended from mizrahi and sephardic jews, not from ashkenazis. They aren’t as responsible for infiltrating America and Europe because they weren’t bred for it like the ashkenazis were, but they contribute where they can to our demise.
Jesus was a jew (and possibly their messiah as he ushered in the era of jewish control over Europe). The jews have been trying to take over countries that weren’t theirs since long before Jesus according to their own book, and Abraham’s blessing gives them the right to according to that book. Even by their false narrative of what happened in Egypt, the jews still look like the bad guys who took over a country that wasn’t theirs and inflicted horrible calamities on its people for refusing to be ruled by foreigners. If your faith tells you that Egyptian ethno-nationalism is wrong and that jews should have been allowed to keep ruling Egypt, you either need to question your faith or question your commitment to ethno-nationalism and overthrowing the jews.
Abraham's half truth to save his own life is not trickery-for-gain. You're grasping.
Jacob had a hard life because of his misdeeds, you can gloss over that.
It's foolish to invent subtext and build doctrine from it when God says EVERY WORD of the scriptures is our guide. Not what you imagine it implies. You either believe God and his Word or you don't and increasingly it's apparent you don't, so you make up a secret narrative that suits you.
Then for Joseph you clearly don't believe the Bible cause you're like "there's no secular historical confirmation". As if you trust the words of men more than God?
Oh, I just got to the part where you said "So no, I will not simply take the jew book at its word" I get it now. you're just a fool believing lies of the world and not God.
Literally your pnly response is "the bible says it so ot's true". There are over a thousand differently worded translations of the bible that say different things and none are accurate to the original text. Basically all of them contain both contradictions and easily disprovable claims, with no proof that your god is any more real than any other (except maybe the success of that god's original chosen people in ruling over you).
The Edda is correct, Wotan is Allfather over all, and you are a heathen for doubting His holy word.
Allah is the one true god and you are a heathen for not believing the words of his prophets.
Uranus is the father of the gods and you are a fool for doubting the stories of his glory.
See how easy that is, and how shit tier an argument it is? Every argument you have against believing in those other gods applies to yours, and so do many others. At least Wotan and Uranus are not kikes and never chose lying kikes to be their chosen people. You're believing the holy book of the same people who created islam, communism, satanism, objectivism, freemasonry, feminism, and a hundred other movements for the sake of controlling others. At least Wotan and Uranus were not created by the most subversive people on history as yahweh/yaldabaoth was.
Why worship kikes wothout question? Why deny the need to corroborate the stories with historical evidence before believing the words of the most corrupt tribe of liars in history?
There are over a thousand differently worded translations of the bible that say different things and none are accurate to the original text.
Actually for 1800 years there was virtually no debate regarding the text as we had thousands of ancient manuscripts that all agreed, it wasn't until the 1800s when two allegedly older manuscripts were found that all these modern fake "bibles" started appearing, financed by guess who?
All the corrupt seminaries and bible colleges and every major english translation thought it was smart to ignore the thousands and translate from those two and now what you said has become correct.
But stick with the King James Bible and you'll be reading an accurate English translation of what we had for two millennia.
The Abrahamic blessing gives the descendants of Abraham the right to rule all nations. They may claim rulership through trickery rather than by protecting and providing for their people, as Jacob used trickery to gain the Abrahamic blessing over his brother who was a masculine protector and provider. Joseph used verbal trickery and economic manipulation to become the richest and most powerful man in ancient Egypt, just as jewish swindlers have done for thousands of years when forced to flee to new lands.
Genesis is the story of how the tribe that believes they are owed world domination learned to be tricksy nation stealing mother fuckers.
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 00:08:54 ago (+1/-0)*
The Abrahamic blessing gives the descendants of Abraham the right to rule all nations
From what I’ve heard, “descendants” wasn’t plural until it was added in the 1870s by Cyrus Scofield at the request of some Jew backers from the Lotus club in Chicago or Boston.
So, the whole "decended from (((Abraham)))" thing is bullshit then? You have a serious problem with your own holy book if that's the case.
Here's the problem with Christ-Cucks. They don't read their (((Bible))). So, they don't know what the fuck it says. ProTip: It says Jesus is a (((Sand-Nigger))). It's pretty fucking clear on this point.
Jesus isn't German. Jesus isn't Celt. Jesus isn't Roman. Jesus isn't Greek.
He specifically popped out of a Jewess' cunt. That makes him a Jew. There's no level of Christ-Cuck ignorance of the source material that can change this fact.
Abrahamic religion is the issue. The blessing of Abraham specifically gives Abraham's descendants the right to rule other nations. By believing in Abrahamism, you spiritually accept that your people deserve to be ruled by a tribe whose ancestors lived on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean.
No, one specific tribe of "fellow white people" are Abraham's people. If you are not descended from that tribe, you are not Abraham's people. If your ancestors are from northern and western Europe, you are separated from that tribe by thousands of years of heredity from long before Joseph and Moses.
This is just purity spiraling. And for absolutely no reason. Hebrews started at Noah’s grandson Eber, the cannanites also started at Noah’s grandson….Canaan. So “jews” and cannanites literally descended from first cousins living at the same time.
Unless you want to make the case that all 500 pages of biblical lineage of Jews and Hebrews and noahides and whatever the fuck, is just a story of ideology and not racial connection, then you have no point and should just concede that @Master_Foo has the wider and more correct perspective here. The “jew” issue is a blood issue, NOT ideology. So their cousins and uncles and great grandfathers all belong under the same umbrella.
A (((Sand-Nigger))) is a (((Sand-Nigger))) don't act like we give a fuck about what kind of Jew Jesus was, as if that magically makes him not a Jew.
Here's a challenge for you. What Haplogroup did Jesus belong to? Here, I'll save you some time and answer for you, because Christ-Cucks aren't allowed to have answers. The answer is YOU DON'T KNOW. The ONLY THING you know is that according to the Heroic-Epic of the Jews, his linage traces back to (((Abraham))) and (((Abraham))) is the patron of the Jews.
But, you actually didn't know that because Christ-Cucks don't read the (((Bible))). Otherwise, we wouldn't be talking about what is in YOUR holy book.
Instead of arguing with me about this, you need to go argue with your (((Bible))).
You are conflating the exact two things the article explains as being separate. Either you are a fucking moron or jew shill. Either way your reading comprehension is niggerish at best.
"An article on the interwebs written by someone who never read the Bible supersedes the infallible word of God" - Christ-Cuck Logic 2023
Like I said, you need to resolve the differences you have with your holy book before you post stupid shit on message boards. I'm not your problem. Your ignorance of the material in the Bible is your problem.
Look at it this way, a lot of people believe in the Bible, right or wrong. jews larp and twist the Bible to get a massive amount of misinformed Christians to help them genocide Whites. The misinformed Christians could benefit from knowing this information to help them stop attacking their cousins and being aimed in the proper direction.
The answer is to point out that "Jesus isn't White" which is factually true, and the onus is on Christ-Cucks to stop worshiping Jesus because he isn't White.
The "Jesus isn't a Jew" is just Christ-Cucks trying to justify their own traitors behavior. Jesus was a Jew, and all you are doing is saying "Jesus wasn't THIS SPECIFIC KIND OF JEW"... as if that waves away the fact that he is just (((another kind))) of Jew.
Jesus is a God, not a human. Therefore, Jesus has no human race or human ethnicity.
No where does it say that Jesus descended from Abraham. Joseph did. His step-dad Joseph was of the House of David and therefore a descendant of Abraham. But Mary was pregnant before she met Joseph. They married when she was pregnant. And then the Messiah was "technically" born of the House of David.
So Jesus is a God, who fulfilled the prophesy through a technicality. Jesus is not an actual descendant of Abraham, and is not of the House of David. But he technically did fulfil the prophesy of the Messiah.
No where does it say that Jesus descended from Abraham.
Remember that part where I said "Here's the problem with Christ-Cucks. They don't read their (((Bible))). So, they don't know what the fuck it says."? You just proved that you have never read the (((Bible))) and don't know what it says. There are two genealogies of Jesus in the (((Bible))). You would know that if you had read the (((Bible))), but, you are a Christ-Cuck, so, you have never read the (((Bible))).
So Jesus is a God, who fulfilled the prophesy through a technicality.
How very Jewish of him. I mean, an Omnipotent God wouldn't have to work on technicalities... Unless he's a Jewish-God with Jewish tendencies.
You just proved that you have never read the (((Bible))) and don't know what it says.
It says that Jesus' step-dad was of the House of David and a direct descendant of Abraham. Jesus was born when Mary and Joseph were married. Creating the technicality that he was born of the House of David just like the prophesy said he would be.
Omnipotent God wouldn't have to work on technicalities... Unless he's a Jewish-God with Jewish tendencies.
It's frustrating talking to you bug people. Because bug people are completely incapable of abstract thought. If you were capable of abstract thought, you'd realise that this was an extremely clever way of fulfilling a prophesy of the Jewish religion, while at the same time invalidating the Jewish religion and demonising the Jews.
You clearly aren't capable of abstract thought, but let's see if you can complete this task - You're back in biblical times and you're tasked with destroying the jewish religion and wiping out the jewish people. You're just one man, you don't have an army or kingdom. How do you do it?
Well, you aren't capable of abstract thought, so I'll do it for you. What I would do is come up with a new religion that incorporates the dominant religion of the area. It takes one of their prophesies and fulfils it. There is one. The coming Messiah, but the Messiah was to be a jew born out of the house of David. I don't want the Messiah to be a jew, so how do I do it?
Well, I come up with a virgin birth (which sounds ridiculous, but worked in other religions, so I go with it). The mother meets and marries someone from the house of David after becoming pregnant. So the kid is technically born under the house of David without actually being jewish. - There you go. I have a Messiah that fulfils the prophesy.
The Messiah then invalidates the animal sacrifices and such, making the jewish temples pointless. So they are only used by evil people who won't follow the new Messiah. So the temples are evil and should be torn down. I throw in things like outlawing the jew's most successful source of income (money lending). Then to close it all off, I have the jews murder the Messiah and the jews scream out, "“His blood is on us and on our children!” demonising the jews for eternity. But the jews killing the Messiah didn't work because.... ummm.... he comes back to life or something. Then I'd make a bunch of prophecies about how the jews (the Anti-Christ, the Against-Jesus people) will destroy the Earth and destroy mankind if the jews aren't wiped out.
Of course, I have to give everyone who follows this new religion a reward. So... the reward is... ummm.... when you die you'll get everything you've ever wanted, or something like that. And everyone who doesn't follow my religion, even if they live a good life, they'll still get punished with eternal suffering and such. And there's someone who sees everything. All the bad things others do, and all the good things you do. So be good for goodness' sake.
Look. The point is that if you were living back in biblical times, and you wanted to destroy the jewish religion and wipe out the jewish people, you would create a new religion exactly like the Christianity in the New Testament. And you would spin it off of the religion everyone in the area already believes.
Yes the jews have tried to twist the Christian religion. But the core of the Christian religion is that the jews are inherently evil and need to be wiped out. The Christian religion isn't useless, and it isn't the enemy. Bring Christianity back to it's true purpose and it's the most valuable tool in wiping out the jews. And that's why the jews, and jewish puppets like yourself, work so hard on changing it into something it isn't.
Jesus wasn't "one man without an army". He supposedly is God. If he wanted to genocide the Jews, he would have just done it with his laser eyes. But, the Jews are still here, so fuck him. He doesn't get to be treated like a God. He gets to be treated like a Jew who lies to Whites.
Holy fuck. You definitely are incapable of abstract thought.
I was showing you what someone would do to try to wipe out the Jews during biblical times. How someone would make up a story, a new religion, that would be exactly the same as the Christian religion.
If you were capable of abstract thought (which you aren't) you would have understood that the entire reason that Christianity was created was as an attempt to wipe out the Jews.
I was showing you what someone would do to try to wipe out the Jews during biblical times.
We are talking about a guy who can turn everyone in Sodom and Gomorrah into pillars of salt. If it were his intention, Jesus could do the same thing to every last Jew left in the world.
Yet, all Jesus ever did was flip over a table.
THAT'S your "messiah". And that's why we call you Christ-Cuck. Your god is pathetic, and you are pathetic for worshiping a pathetic god.
Again - Holy fuck. You definitely are incapable of abstract thought.
You want to say that Jesus didn't walk the Earth? Fine. Then why did someone make up that entire story; create the entire Christian religion?
The story of Jesus is a story that demonises the Jews. The Christian religion is a religion built around demonising the Jews and justifying their extermination.
Whether Jesus is real or not is irrelevant. Christianity is a way to rally people together to exterminate the Jews. People don't need to believe the mythology to participate. Anyone can unite with Christians to exterminate the Jews.
The Anti-Christ is not one person who is the opposite of Christ. The Anti-Christ are the people Against-Christ, Against Jesus. The Anti-Christ are the ones who crucified Jesus. The Anti-Christ are the Jews. The only way into Heaven is through Jesus. The Anti-Christ are destined for Hell and are therefore inherently evil. Religious Christians are required by their religion to exterminate the Jews. Then there are Christians, who don't believe the mythology, but are Christian because they want to help; because they want to participate.
You don't have to believe the mythology to participate in the extermination of the Jews.
Anyone trying to stop people from uniting and exterminating the Anti-Christ are Jewish puppets. Stop being a Jewish puppet pushing the Jew's biggest agenda.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 6 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:29:09 ago (+6/-0)*
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 20:05:29 ago (+8/-7)
The story of our people is not the same as the (((people))) in the (((Bible))).
We weren't wandering around in the desert chopping off our dicks at the end of the Bronze Age Collapse.
Those were Sand-Niggers. Not us.
We weren't in the Bible. We were off doing our own thing. You should be more concerned about what your ancestors were doing and less concerned with the affairs of (((Sand-Niggers))).
/v/PaganFarmRemembers
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 21:04:43 ago (+5/-2)*
White peoples dominated the entire globe 10,000 years ago, and there is evidence and legends describing white peoples and their feats by nearly everyone. Maybe you stayed in a hole, you (((sandnigger)))
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 22:36:55 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:09:37 ago (+0/-0)
BTW, Odin was a Hebrew
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:27:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:32:31 ago (+0/-0)
For instance, the founders of Troy came "out of Egypt" and then later went on to found Rome and Wales (which is why many Roman Royals were British: royal blood. Constantine's mother...)
Keep reading your histories. It's fascinating.
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 11:16:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 00:04:33 ago (+2/-3)*
Pagan Celts who lived all over europe, then Pagan Angles/Saxons from Germany (@450AD), then Pagan Vikings from scandinavia (@700ishAD) who couldnt completely wipe out the pagan Vikings, then Normans from Normandy (france) (@900AD) which were converted Vikings also from scandinavia who went over to england and buttfucked their still pagan Viking cousins AND their still pagan Anglo-Saxons and made the whole fucking place Christian before 1100 and the rest, as they say, is history.
The gods you think you believe in got assblasted away a millenia ago and fuck all remains but half legible runestones.
I mean you can argue but that shit is the written history of about 7 different fucking nations who were all trying to kill each other.
And thats not even taking into account the Christians who wiped the pagan celts off the face of Ireland 600 years before England was unified by Christians (plus Kievan Rus (Proto Russia), Sicily (Proto Italy), East and West Francia aka Proto France and Proto Germany)
Either way, your gods failed you and became my ancient ancestors. Dont get me wrong we wouldnt be were we were without those long extinct people but you know, it is what it is.
Learn to history.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 01:52:38 ago (+3/-0)
He basically said the Vikings and Jews ancestry is separated by 1000s of years, and you say he’s wrong..
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:03:08 ago (+2/-1)
Pagans brought us to the brink of the industrial revolution twice before jews fucked it up and destroyed their civilizations from within both times, and it took over 1000 years for christians to get there again. The jews were so afraid of Paganism that they destroyed as many of the records as they could. Sure, Paganism lost - so did Hitler. But the world would be a better place if Paganism had won and destroyed the jews.
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:12:22 ago (+1/-0)
Our ancestor is Abraham. We are all the Adamic Race. The Aryan Race ... Noble Race
Jews are liars and you are falling for it.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 16:09:41 ago (+1/-0)
Unless I just don’t know you and you’ve been a huge fag elsewhere, even some staunch Christian that totally disagrees with you, has no good reason to downvote that particular comment.
If it is just Christian’s, they should be ashamed their faith means so little to them, that they can’t engage a non Christian at that level, that’s being entirely calm and rational.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 23:40:19 ago (+1/-0)
And would you care if you found out we weren’t in any of those empires?
Like do you think less of our people if we weren’t the ones that built the pyramids?
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 10:40:37 ago (+0/-0)
Grow balls ya cunt
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:06:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 15:32:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 15:35:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 15:54:15 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 16:10:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 16:50:09 ago (+0/-0)
The Bible has nothing to do with Whites. So, it's time to drop it.
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 14:42:02 ago (+0/-0)
Your statement is obviously false, and you are clearly in denial.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 15:11:45 ago (+0/-0)
Christ-Cuck logic.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 03:07:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 14:43:50 ago (+0/-0)
I'm having a real argument. Go eat more dirt, guy.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 17:36:53 ago (+0/-0)
As if his silly comment speaks anything to the obvious truth of a creator?
And I'm the dirt eater?
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 17:59:42 ago (+0/-0)
you're batting 0
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 02:08:24 ago (+0/-1)
Like look at the replies, there’s no argument whatsoever.
I disagree but at least understand when Christian’s just get offended when you paste “Christ cuck” all over a post.
But how the fuck can any white person argue that we should be more focused on our ancestors then the heebs?
Doesn’t even mean you have to accept or believe in our ancestors gods (I don’t), but how can they actually disagree that they should know it?
It’s sad.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 13:15:16 ago (+0/-0)
To think they do is reddit minded niggotry
Free speech isn't a popularity contest
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -4 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 03:27:25 ago (+0/-4)*
The important thing to consider is, Christ-Cucks don't get mad that we call them Christ-Cucks. It's like calling someone a NiggerFaggot, who cares?
...
Unless you are literally a Nigger who is a Faggot and is ashamed of himself. They REALLY get mad when they get called a NiggerFaggot.
...
Likewise with the Christ-Cuck. They know deep down that they give power to a foreign Heroic-Epic which enslaves them and their own people, so, like the Nigger who is a Faggot, they must derail the conversation without ever addressing their own culpability in the matter.
Neitzsche called this "The Bad Conscience".
Christ-Cuck's law is iron clad.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 03:05:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 03:30:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 12:33:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] IfuckedYerMum
[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 23:41:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 00:01:22 ago (+1/-0)
Land of the Angles.
Saxony (Sachsen)
The white celts were all over europe a hell of a long time before that.
Everywhere from South western france to portugal to England/Ireland and presumably Doggerland which is now Dogger Bank underneath the the channel.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 05:31:01 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 01:36:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 4 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 05:36:09 ago (+5/-1)*
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:14:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 10:26:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 10:30:39 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 15:08:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 19:18:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 02:58:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 04:30:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Cunt
[ - ] Cunt 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 00:55:09 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] Optional_Reading
[ - ] Optional_Reading 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 22:33:51 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 4 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 05:53:06 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 10:42:13 ago (+0/-0)
If youre anti abortion you're pro nigger
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 23:00:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 12:34:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MicahReno
[ - ] MicahReno 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 20:01:30 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 03:42:02 ago (+1/-2)
Jews arguing with each other is not a valid reason for a self-respecting White man to worship a Jew as his Messiah.
But, it is something a traitorous White person would do.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:23:17 ago (+4/-2)
And though there is reason to study European paganism - which no one here does seriously - it is mostly as an anthropological exercise in gaining a broader understanding of white culture. Even most neo-pagans don't seriously believe the old gods exist.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 22:57:55 ago (+0/-0)
The jews who control our world seem to take the divine/spiritual realm pretty seriously. Most of them practice kaballah, freemasonry, satanism, or some similar occult system. They don't just put predictive programming out there constantly, they also put judaic, masonic, saturnian, and other forms of occult symbolism out there constantly, particularly in works that are predictive. Paganism began to decline when the jews began to spread the belief that the gods were metaphorical and not real in some sense (even if many of the myths are allegorical rather than literal). One of the mantras of the mystical secret societies that rule the world is "as above, so below". What you worship affects what happens in reality. If you give your belief to the god of Abraham, you give your belief to a god that believes its chosen tribe deserves to rule all other tribes. If you give your belief to Wotan, you give your belief to a god who honors the men who protect and provide for northern European people and the women who nurture and raise the future of our people.
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 20:07:35 ago (+4/-3)
- Jesus is a God and therefore does not have a human race or human ethnicity.
To claim Jesus was a Jew is to deny he is a God.
- Jesus practised Christianity, not Judaism.
Someone has to be extremely stupid to not know this.
- Jesus was born of the House of David through the technicality of his step-dad.
The Messiah had to be born of the House of David to fulfil the prophesy. Mary was pregnant before she met Joseph. They married before Jesus was born. The prophesy was fulfilled through a technicality and Jesus' only link to the House of David is through this technicality.
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 4 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 22:56:58 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 10:43:56 ago (+0/-0)
God does not exist
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 03:38:43 ago (+0/-2)
So, either (((Jesus))) is genetically NULL, and the he isn't the (((Messiah))) because he isn't descended from (((David))), or the prophecy itself is bullshit, in which case, the prophecy being a part of the (((Bible))) is the unerring word of God, is wrong and all of Christianity is bullshit.
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 06:37:49 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:23:51 ago (+1/-0)
And the point is this: Jesus is NOT Yahweh. He was a man who is our Brother, not our God to worship. Praise his actions redeeming us, be grateful, but your God of the Covenant is Jesus' Father as he is also our Father. Jesus was just who Yahweh chose to be the spotless lamb, and was chosen from a worthy family of a good and prophesied lineage.
Don't argue about the trinity: it's dumb.
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 10:33:19 ago (+1/-0)
Do you deny John 1:18? You don't believe Titus 2:13
Jesus is God. God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost. 1 John 5:7
Jesus was born of a virgin. Mary was of the line of David. His adopted father was also of the line of David. Therefore, He is of the line of David. Nothing says that He has any genetic material from Mary. He was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of a virgin.
He is God. He can do as He pleases. I believe in Him and I believe 1 Timothy 1:4 and Titus 3:9.
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 10:53:43 ago (+0/-0)
Jesus was of the Tribe of Judah, in the line directly from David. This only means genealogy. You must believe even that, right? Why else would genealogy matter so much? Sure they can be the subject of vain conversations and arguments, especially in a world so far removed from those lines as to nearly be lost to time, but why were they in the bible in the first place, and the subject of promises from Yahweh? If you think these discussions cloud the Message rather than reveal it, then you are brainwashed.
Paul was writing to the Northern Tribes, who were divorced from Yahweh. Judahs perversion angered God who then used Jesus' Sacrifice to graft back in the wild branches of Hebrews, then using them to reach the Judahites.
Don't pick out verses at me. Read the whole thing.
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 13:10:17 ago (+0/-0)
It's obvious Jesus is God. If you can't believe that, why bother?
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 13:12:07 ago (+0/-0)
Because it is righteous. It is written in my heart. What do you mean?
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 15:26:34 ago (+0/-0)
Your problem isn't with me. Your problem is with the inconsistent narrative of your own God.
Christ-Cucks law is in play.
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 22:17:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:25:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Rob3122
[ - ] Rob3122 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:09:19 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 14:34:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 11:20:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:49:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 01:28:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 22:45:53 ago (+0/-0)
2. The Israelites and Judeans believed in the same prophets and had similar versions of many of the same myths.
3. Jesus' adoptive father Joseph (and the historian who may have made them up, Josephus) are named after Joseph from Genesis. Joseph was the one who first fulfilled the Abrahamic blessing by placing Egypt under Abrahamic control, thus beginning the long war for independence from Abrahamics.
I'd be interested to see genetic evidence of differences between ancient Israelites and Judeans to see which one modern jews are more closely related to, though.
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:18:01 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:23:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:29:38 ago (+1/-0)
I'm desputing any of the 13 Tribes of Israel remained in judea after the death of Jesus. At least in any meaningful amount as to be a part of the dna of the region.
Does Ashkenazi DNA resemble that of the Welsh? No? Well then Ashkenazi DNA is not close to that of the Hebrews.
The argument you have just made makes no sense, unless you want to explain where/who the DNA came from. Are they using 2000+ year old DNA?
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:35:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:42:07 ago (+1/-1)
The vatican and London have tried to stamp out the welsh language, because it is the oldest surviving language in the world, and it's histories tell the tales that people wouldn't even believe in today's society. Welsh language is the key to the Etruscans and Egyptian
Hieroglyphs ... and probably ancient Hebrew.
Check out the books/videos by Wilson and Blackett
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:54:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:58:34 ago (+1/-1)
get it? It's not absurd, its what Europeans believed up until the last several hundred years. It's why our entire race converted to Christianity quite quickly. Our WHOLE race.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 11:10:25 ago (+0/-0)
Judea/Israel is in the middle east where the Mediterranean and the seas that lead to the Indian Ocean meet. If you wanted to move goods from the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean, you had to pass through either Egypt or Judea, unloading the goods and reloading them onto a boat in the other ocean. If you wanted to move goods by land from Egypt/North Africa into Arabia, Asia Minor, or India, you had to pass through Judea. If you were moving goods from Arabia or India into Europe, Judea was generally the most convenient trade route to pass through. Thus the Judeans evolved to be merchants due to being in a central location where multiple land and sea trade routes all met up in one place. When you look at the jewish talent for language and finance, it makes sense that modern jews would have descended from a people who spent thousands of years evolving to be mercantile.
Compare that to northern and western Europeans who have light skin and who are about the most forward thinking, responsible people on Earth. Our ancestors evolved in cold climates with harsh winters that they had to prepare for, thus forcing them to evolve into the type of people who plan ahead and value productivity. Judea/Israel has very mild winters, not the kind you have to stockpile resources for as you do in much of Europe. The further west and north you are in Europe, the fewer trade routes pass through your land, and thus the less mercantile your people evolved to be. The Brits didn't become a mercantile empire until a few hundred years ago when jewish bankers like the Rothschilds took over their economy, and the Nords are still among the least mercantile people on Earth.
Khazaria is a bit of a mix - less of a trade hub than Judea but more of one than the Nordic countries or British Isles. Some land trade routes from Europe into Asia passed through there but the Black Sea is the dead end of Mediterranean sea routes and most sea trade from Europe would have stopped in Asia Minor rather than going up to the Black Sea, so they'd have evolved a little bit of merchant traits but not nearly as much as people from Judea. Khazar was and still is known as one of the most fertile farming regions on Earth, and the jews are not known for being particularly good at farming. Thus there is no reason to assume that people native to Ukraine/Khazar are the primary forefathers of modern jews - more likely jews from Judea who evolved to be tricksy merchants moved in and took over their ruling class so they could exploit the Slavic peasant farmers.
Modern jews being descended from Judean merchants who spent thousands of years profiting from the exchange of goods between many different eastern and western nations makes perfect evolutionary sense. Modern jews being descended from the native people of what's now Ukraine makes very little sense without Judean admixture. Modern Welsh, Brits, and other western and northern European peoples being primarily or significantly descended from Judean merchants makes no sense. Your bullshit is absolutely absurd jewish lies to make you accept their holy books.
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 11:19:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 11:18:34 ago (+0/-1)
nah. They were merchants who are parasites requiring a host nation, on whose work they subsist.
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:43:08 ago (+0/-1)
And you believe them?
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 23:45:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] DoughGoy
[ - ] DoughGoy 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 08:29:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 08:58:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:17:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Portmanure
[ - ] Portmanure 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 22:32:58 ago (+0/-0)
This post offered a very interesting history on this subject.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 02:32:15 ago (+0/-1)
In the fourth sentence the author states " Jesus was also a direct descendant of Judah through David." Descendant of Judah, that makes him a jew. He was also a native of Judea, which also would cause Him to rightly be called a jew.
The people who are NOT Jews are the modern day usurpers who call themselves Jews.
So when we talk about today's "Jews" we are just using the name they falsely claim a right to.
They are spiritual descendants of the Christ-hating jew religious leaders, scribes and pharisees who had Jesus killed, but ethnically they are a russo-turkic blend from a kingdom that once inhabited what is now Ukraine called Khazaria, that converted to Judaism around 700 AD(or CE if you're a faggot.)
So the author is wrong in one sense and right in two others.
Wrong that Jesus was not a Jew, ethnically, He clearly was, and there no way to debate that. He's literally a descendant of the man from whom the word "jew" derives.
But right that Jesus is not a jew in the sense the modern not even really Jews but claim to be jews are. And right in the sense that, while He followed the old testament law of God given through Moses, He did not practice the corrupt Judaism of the pharisees that has evolved into the Judaism of today.
Beyond that the author makes some retarded claims, like that the evil Jews of the new Testament were not Israelites and his reasoning is full retard. He says " But a passage in John proves that the Jews were not Israelites since they told Jesus that they had never been in bondage.22 Of course, the Israelites had been held as slaves in Egypt.23 Those were Edomite Jews to whom Jesus was speaking."
Some stupid crap they spouted while arguing with their creator has zero impact on the fact that they were literally born of the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi, and to a much lesser extent there was blood from all the other tribes mixed in. They were 100% Israelites ETHNICALLY.
But as the scripture says, "They are not all Israel that are called Israel." and more importantly:
"And if ye are Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, heirs according to promise"
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 09:11:01 ago (+0/-0)
Since you acknowledge that Jesus was a jew according to what jews were at the time, it's just a question of whether the non-pharisaic jewish religion at the time was good and true or evil and subversive. The Abrahamic blessing gave Joseph the justification to conquer Egypt through trickery, and Jesus came to fulfill the blessing of Abraham. Even without the pharisees' corrupting influence, judaism was still about jews thinking they have the right to rule everyone else.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 03:35:26 ago (+0/-0)
Jesus was a Jew because He was a direct descendant of Judah. He was not a practitioner of the corrupted religion of Judaism, whether pharisaic or otherwise, but did obey the Old Testament laws given by God, some of which the pharisees and other sects did also.
The Abrahamic blessing never gave anyone the right to be shady. Joseph rose to power in Egypt through integrity, honesty, and diligent work, and the blessings of God that those bring. And he served Pharaoh faithfully and wildly successfully causing Pharaoh to end up owning basically all the land in Egypt that had been owned by the rich among the people prior to the famine.
The fact that Judaism has always been corrupt we seem to agree on. Because they, like you, have twisted concepts like the Abrahamic blessing to justify their wicked desires.
God said HE would bless them if they were faithful to Him, and they instead worshipped other Gods, sacrificed children, and did all manner of wickedness and so God said that "The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof."
He also said that Abraham's seed and heir to the promise is Christ Himself and those that are spiritually in Christ. Look up "replacement theology" for an inkling of the scripturally very plain and obvious doctrine. The New Testament is replete with passages explaining that PHYSICAL ISRAEL was no longer SPIRITUALLY ISRAEL. That the natural branch has been cut off and the wild branch grafted in. That they are not all Israel who are of Israel. That Abraham's seed are those who believe Christ.
Have you even read the thing? And if so, have you read the King James or Geneva or Tyndale or any of the early translations before Christ-haters "found" aleph and b in the 1800's and published fake "bibles" based on those frauds that contradict 1800 years of received text?
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 07:11:17 ago (+0/-0)
Even if you take the Joseph story at face value and can't read between the lines to see the obvious pattern of a jew lying about a coming ecological disaster and boom and bust economic cycles to take political and economic control of a country, there's still the fact that Egypt wasn't his country. What the fuck was some jew refugee doing taking control of a country that wasn't his? Why was Joseph, a non-Egyptian, the most powerful person in Egypt? The pattern of a poor jewish refugee fleeing to a new country only to take it over and become its leader starts with Joseph, and just like today he was followed by future generations of jews who looted the country and destroyed it with manmade catastrophes, plagues, and genocide, all because Egypt didn't want to be ruled by foreigners.
If you support Joseph and Moses, you support jews going into countries that aren't their own, becoming the ruling class, and then genociding the population if they resist. That is the story of Joseph and Moses. And you believe that Jesus is the true inheritor of their legacy.
Also the mizrahi jews have been in the middle east for 2000+ years, and they are linked genetically to both sephardic and ashkenazi jews.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 12:27:54 ago (+0/-0)*
Okay name one other person the Bible portrays as being blessed by God for trickery than Jacob that doesn't require making stuff up in your head like you did with Joseph. Reading between the lines rather than just trusting the plain words of the Bible is what someone does when they don't actually believe the Bible, and if you don't believe the Bible what can you even claim to know about any of this?
But even more importantly even Jacob wasn't blessed for his trickery! If you deny that then explain why Jacob was chastened for the rest of his life while Esau lived like a king. Why God punished Jacob harshly for his trickster ways causing him to be the one to get fooled and toil for fourteen years to earn the hand of his beloved and halfway through get stuck with her homely sister who caused nothing but drama for the rest of his life? And had him trembling in fear for decades that his brother was going to murder him if he ever saw his face again. And why, during their lifetimes Jacob had nothing but pain, and drama and Esau had nothing but earthly plenty and became great, while Jacob lost his beloved son, thinking him dead and grieving it until in his very old age? The message of Jacob is not that God condones trickery, but that once he's promised you something he's going to deliver it, no matter how much you prove you don't deserve it. And that speaks to the nature of salvation, once you "confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved" no matter what you do to prove you're still a sinner you'll still be saved, but being saved doesn't save you from having a really hard life because of your sins. "For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth."
Of course I take the Word of God at face value, only what the Bible calls "the simple" or "the fool" does not. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt that they are the uninformed or accidentally misinformed simple rather than the willfully ignorant fool when I talk to them. And regarding why Joseph was in Egypt? Did you not read the story? The aforementioned lifetime of drama Jacob created caused him to end up a slave but because Joseph did “Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. “In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.” God kept his promise and blessed him radically abundantly and as I described in my previous response he was like the goose that laid golden eggs for Pharaoh, causing Pharaoh to prospers immensely in the midst of worldwide famine of all things! And because Joseph did God's will the people he loved and forgave received a portion of the blessing that was on Joseph, but again only after many years of earthly suffering for their own disobedience to God.
God through Joseph brought Egypt to new heights, later God through Moses brought them back to their knees. Both are God's prerogatives. The fact that fake jews twist scripture to justify their subversive khazarian trickery means nothing except that they are heaping damnation upon themselves.
Ok so let's say we agreed that modern "jews" are really descendant of Jacob, even though they're mostly white looking and have a high percentage of blue eyes. It means nothing because the whole New Testament that the promises of God are on the spiritual descendants of Abraham, not the physical, and that means believers in Christ.
And further who even cares about the sephardim or mizrahi? They are not the ones that own everything and run everything the "jews" people on here are always talking about are like 99.9% Ashkenazi.
Look man I don't care about winning an argument on the internet I just care about people knowing and believing the truth and the truth is right there in the plain Word of God and while there are inferences to be drawn from His Word, if you trust human inference more than the plain words of God, it's not gonna end well for you.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 20:09:00 ago (+0/-0)
Abraham who lied to Pharaoh and profited greatly from it.
He received the blessing of Abraham, and however well off Esau was at the time, Esau's line is now "Amalek" while Jacob's line received the blessing of Abraham and was granted rulership over the earth when Jesus came to fulfill the Abrahamic blessing by tricking other nations into worshiping and obeying jews.
How is it simplistic or foolish to read between the lines, but not simplistic or foolish to believe jews at face value? If I believed everything the jews say without thinking deeper about it, I'd be vaccinated for covid, support nuclear war with Russia after freaking out that Trump was gonna start non-nuclear war with Iran, blame Muslims for 9/11 but blame us for bombing them and demand we take in refugees, and believe that the holocaust was about gas chambers and not about fire bombing Dresden. Just as I don’t have to be a marxist to know that marxism is bad, I don’t have to worship jews to know that you shouldn’t trust a book written by jews and pushed onto non-jews.
With that in mind, let's look at the Joseph story. First off, there's no clear parallel in Egyptian history that fits the story as written, no tales about a beloved foreign advisor to the Pharaoh who worked his way up from slavery and saved the land by planning ahead for a multi-year famine. There's also no clear parallel to the Moses story. The closest parallel we find is Pharaoh Akhenaten, who tried to impose monotheism on Egypt. Akhenaten was anti-masculinity, treated his queen Nefertiti as an equal co-ruler, and all artwork depicting him shows him with frail arms, manboobs, and wide hips, whereas nearly all other Pharaohs were depicted with bulky arms and pecs. His one god Aten was described as “mother and father to all people”, thus being hermaphroditic as well as the closest thing to monotheism at the time. He pushed for a lot of weird, unnatural changes to the art style of Egypt, including drawing people with cone heads and spindly limbs (who else pushes weird art to change culture?). His reign was a disaster, and he was eventually forced to flee from his palace and build a new capital city as a refuge from mass protests against his reforms. Plague swept through Egypt during his reign, killing three of Akhenaten's children. Much of the historical record of his reign was intentionally destroyed, his tomb was mostly unadorned, and his grandson Tut, who destroyed his monotheistic faith and restored Egypt to its original Paganism before passing the line of succession to a family that had not been cursed by Akhenaten’s blood, had a cursed tomb that seemingly inflicted a plague on the first group of explorers who entered it. If there was a period where monotheistic Abrahamics rose to power in Egypt but then lost power and were driven from the country, leaving plagues in their wake, it would have been the Akhenaten to Tut era, and the Egyptian version of that story (for which there is still far more concrete evidence than the jewish version even though much of the historical evidence was destroyed) is that a crazy monotheistic couple took over Egypt, tried to destroy its native culture through gender bullshit, weird art, and destroying its native religion, and saw their country ravaged by popular uprisings and plagues which forced them and their followers to flee and hide from their own subjects. That is as close as you will get to an Egyptian version of Joseph and Moses because neither the Joseph nor Moses story gives any clear indication of which Pharaohs they were dealing with, nor do the events coincide with anything in Egyptian history unless you realize that you’re dealing with lying kikes who are giving you their very biased side of a story that played out very differently.
So no, I will not simply take the jew book at its word, because it does not conform to any historical reality and is clearly a biased work written by the most dishonest and immoral tribe in human history.
Egypt was already a great nation before Joseph arrived. What right did a foreign god have to take over and then destroy another nation? If you believe in ethno-nationalism, shouldn’t you look at the story of Joseph becoming de-facto ruler of Egypt as a bad thing since ethno-nationalism means not having to be ruled by people of another ethnic group?
Sephardic and Mizrahi jews still support the jew power structure – see sephardic jew AOC pushing the marxist narrative for one obvious example, or the Wahhabi leaders of Saudi Arabia who are mostly descended from mizrahi and sephardic jews, not from ashkenazis. They aren’t as responsible for infiltrating America and Europe because they weren’t bred for it like the ashkenazis were, but they contribute where they can to our demise.
Jesus was a jew (and possibly their messiah as he ushered in the era of jewish control over Europe). The jews have been trying to take over countries that weren’t theirs since long before Jesus according to their own book, and Abraham’s blessing gives them the right to according to that book. Even by their false narrative of what happened in Egypt, the jews still look like the bad guys who took over a country that wasn’t theirs and inflicted horrible calamities on its people for refusing to be ruled by foreigners. If your faith tells you that Egyptian ethno-nationalism is wrong and that jews should have been allowed to keep ruling Egypt, you either need to question your faith or question your commitment to ethno-nationalism and overthrowing the jews.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 7, 2023 12:11:52 ago (+0/-0)
Jacob had a hard life because of his misdeeds, you can gloss over that.
It's foolish to invent subtext and build doctrine from it when God says EVERY WORD of the scriptures is our guide. Not what you imagine it implies. You either believe God and his Word or you don't and increasingly it's apparent you don't, so you make up a secret narrative that suits you.
Then for Joseph you clearly don't believe the Bible cause you're like "there's no secular historical confirmation". As if you trust the words of men more than God?
Oh, I just got to the part where you said "So no, I will not simply take the jew book at its word" I get it now. you're just a fool believing lies of the world and not God.
Hope you wise up before you wake up in hell.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 7, 2023 13:24:06 ago (+0/-0)
The Edda is correct, Wotan is Allfather over all, and you are a heathen for doubting His holy word.
Allah is the one true god and you are a heathen for not believing the words of his prophets.
Uranus is the father of the gods and you are a fool for doubting the stories of his glory.
See how easy that is, and how shit tier an argument it is? Every argument you have against believing in those other gods applies to yours, and so do many others. At least Wotan and Uranus are not kikes and never chose lying kikes to be their chosen people. You're believing the holy book of the same people who created islam, communism, satanism, objectivism, freemasonry, feminism, and a hundred other movements for the sake of controlling others. At least Wotan and Uranus were not created by the most subversive people on history as yahweh/yaldabaoth was.
Why worship kikes wothout question? Why deny the need to corroborate the stories with historical evidence before believing the words of the most corrupt tribe of liars in history?
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 10, 2023 00:39:19 ago (+0/-0)
Actually for 1800 years there was virtually no debate regarding the text as we had thousands of ancient manuscripts that all agreed, it wasn't until the 1800s when two allegedly older manuscripts were found that all these modern fake "bibles" started appearing, financed by guess who?
All the corrupt seminaries and bible colleges and every major english translation thought it was smart to ignore the thousands and translate from those two and now what you said has become correct.
But stick with the King James Bible and you'll be reading an accurate English translation of what we had for two millennia.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 7, 2023 13:00:59 ago (+0/-0)
Ok you're retarded, there's only one God and He owns everything.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 00:15:47 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:15:09 ago (+2/-4)
That article is written by a retard. Israelite is another term for jew. My god, the amount of cope is ridiculous.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:17:39 ago (+6/-3)
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:22:16 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:50:51 ago (+5/-2)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 23:01:25 ago (+0/-0)
Genesis is the story of how the tribe that believes they are owed world domination learned to be tricksy nation stealing mother fuckers.
Read your bibles.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 00:08:54 ago (+1/-0)*
From what I’ve heard, “descendants” wasn’t plural until it was added in the 1870s by Cyrus Scofield at the request of some Jew backers from the Lotus club in Chicago or Boston.
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 06:23:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 18:31:31 ago (+3/-5)
Here's the problem with Christ-Cucks. They don't read their (((Bible))). So, they don't know what the fuck it says.
ProTip: It says Jesus is a (((Sand-Nigger))). It's pretty fucking clear on this point.
Jesus isn't German.
Jesus isn't Celt.
Jesus isn't Roman.
Jesus isn't Greek.
He specifically popped out of a Jewess' cunt. That makes him a Jew.
There's no level of Christ-Cuck ignorance of the source material that can change this fact.
Christ-Cuck's law is in play. Prove me wrong.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 4 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 18:37:41 ago (+6/-2)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 23:04:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 23:58:38 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 08:55:01 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 15:57:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 01:34:28 ago (+0/-0)
This is just purity spiraling. And for absolutely no reason.
Hebrews started at Noah’s grandson Eber, the cannanites also started at Noah’s grandson….Canaan.
So “jews” and cannanites literally descended from first cousins living at the same time.
Unless you want to make the case that all 500 pages of biblical lineage of Jews and Hebrews and noahides and whatever the fuck, is just a story of ideology and not racial connection, then you have no point and should just concede that @Master_Foo has the wider and more correct perspective here.
The “jew” issue is a blood issue, NOT ideology. So their cousins and uncles and great grandfathers all belong under the same umbrella.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 15:48:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 18:48:36 ago (+2/-4)
Here's a challenge for you. What Haplogroup did Jesus belong to?
Here, I'll save you some time and answer for you, because Christ-Cucks aren't allowed to have answers.
The answer is YOU DON'T KNOW.
The ONLY THING you know is that according to the Heroic-Epic of the Jews, his linage traces back to (((Abraham))) and (((Abraham))) is the patron of the Jews.
But, you actually didn't know that because Christ-Cucks don't read the (((Bible))). Otherwise, we wouldn't be talking about what is in YOUR holy book.
Instead of arguing with me about this, you need to go argue with your (((Bible))).
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:14:54 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:20:53 ago (+2/-4)
Like I said, you need to resolve the differences you have with your holy book before you post stupid shit on message boards.
I'm not your problem.
Your ignorance of the material in the Bible is your problem.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:54:10 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 19:59:43 ago (+2/-2)
The "Jesus isn't a Jew" is just Christ-Cucks trying to justify their own traitors behavior. Jesus was a Jew, and all you are doing is saying "Jesus wasn't THIS SPECIFIC KIND OF JEW"... as if that waves away the fact that he is just (((another kind))) of Jew.
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 4, 2023 20:40:20 ago (+2/-0)
Jesus is a God, not a human. Therefore, Jesus has no human race or human ethnicity.
No where does it say that Jesus descended from Abraham.
Joseph did. His step-dad Joseph was of the House of David and therefore a descendant of Abraham.
But Mary was pregnant before she met Joseph. They married when she was pregnant. And then the Messiah was "technically" born of the House of David.
So Jesus is a God, who fulfilled the prophesy through a technicality.
Jesus is not an actual descendant of Abraham, and is not of the House of David. But he technically did fulfil the prophesy of the Messiah.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 03:49:57 ago (+0/-2)
You just proved that you have never read the (((Bible))) and don't know what it says.
There are two genealogies of Jesus in the (((Bible))). You would know that if you had read the (((Bible))), but, you are a Christ-Cuck, so, you have never read the (((Bible))).
I mean, an Omnipotent God wouldn't have to work on technicalities... Unless he's a Jewish-God with Jewish tendencies.
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 15:36:28 ago (+0/-0)
It says that Jesus' step-dad was of the House of David and a direct descendant of Abraham.
Jesus was born when Mary and Joseph were married. Creating the technicality that he was born of the House of David just like the prophesy said he would be.
It's frustrating talking to you bug people. Because bug people are completely incapable of abstract thought.
If you were capable of abstract thought, you'd realise that this was an extremely clever way of fulfilling a prophesy of the Jewish religion, while at the same time invalidating the Jewish religion and demonising the Jews.
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 15:54:47 ago (+0/-0)
You're back in biblical times and you're tasked with destroying the jewish religion and wiping out the jewish people. You're just one man, you don't have an army or kingdom.
How do you do it?
Well, you aren't capable of abstract thought, so I'll do it for you.
What I would do is come up with a new religion that incorporates the dominant religion of the area. It takes one of their prophesies and fulfils it.
There is one. The coming Messiah, but the Messiah was to be a jew born out of the house of David.
I don't want the Messiah to be a jew, so how do I do it?
Well, I come up with a virgin birth (which sounds ridiculous, but worked in other religions, so I go with it). The mother meets and marries someone from the house of David after becoming pregnant. So the kid is technically born under the house of David without actually being jewish. - There you go. I have a Messiah that fulfils the prophesy.
The Messiah then invalidates the animal sacrifices and such, making the jewish temples pointless. So they are only used by evil people who won't follow the new Messiah. So the temples are evil and should be torn down.
I throw in things like outlawing the jew's most successful source of income (money lending).
Then to close it all off, I have the jews murder the Messiah and the jews scream out, "“His blood is on us and on our children!” demonising the jews for eternity.
But the jews killing the Messiah didn't work because.... ummm.... he comes back to life or something.
Then I'd make a bunch of prophecies about how the jews (the Anti-Christ, the Against-Jesus people) will destroy the Earth and destroy mankind if the jews aren't wiped out.
Of course, I have to give everyone who follows this new religion a reward. So... the reward is... ummm.... when you die you'll get everything you've ever wanted, or something like that.
And everyone who doesn't follow my religion, even if they live a good life, they'll still get punished with eternal suffering and such.
And there's someone who sees everything. All the bad things others do, and all the good things you do. So be good for goodness' sake.
Look. The point is that if you were living back in biblical times, and you wanted to destroy the jewish religion and wipe out the jewish people, you would create a new religion exactly like the Christianity in the New Testament. And you would spin it off of the religion everyone in the area already believes.
Yes the jews have tried to twist the Christian religion. But the core of the Christian religion is that the jews are inherently evil and need to be wiped out.
The Christian religion isn't useless, and it isn't the enemy. Bring Christianity back to it's true purpose and it's the most valuable tool in wiping out the jews. And that's why the jews, and jewish puppets like yourself, work so hard on changing it into something it isn't.
Stop being a jewish puppet.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 16:53:08 ago (+0/-0)
But, the Jews are still here, so fuck him. He doesn't get to be treated like a God. He gets to be treated like a Jew who lies to Whites.
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 17:06:59 ago (+0/-0)
I was showing you what someone would do to try to wipe out the Jews during biblical times.
How someone would make up a story, a new religion, that would be exactly the same as the Christian religion.
If you were capable of abstract thought (which you aren't) you would have understood that the entire reason that Christianity was created was as an attempt to wipe out the Jews.
Holy fuck, are you ever stupid.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 5, 2023 17:53:16 ago (+0/-0)*
We are talking about a guy who can turn everyone in Sodom and Gomorrah into pillars of salt. If it were his intention, Jesus could do the same thing to every last Jew left in the world.
Yet, all Jesus ever did was flip over a table.
THAT'S your "messiah". And that's why we call you Christ-Cuck. Your god is pathetic, and you are pathetic for worshiping a pathetic god.
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 6, 2023 00:33:00 ago (+0/-0)
You want to say that Jesus didn't walk the Earth? Fine. Then why did someone make up that entire story; create the entire Christian religion?
The story of Jesus is a story that demonises the Jews.
The Christian religion is a religion built around demonising the Jews and justifying their extermination.
Whether Jesus is real or not is irrelevant.
Christianity is a way to rally people together to exterminate the Jews. People don't need to believe the mythology to participate.
Anyone can unite with Christians to exterminate the Jews.
The Anti-Christ is not one person who is the opposite of Christ.
The Anti-Christ are the people Against-Christ, Against Jesus. The Anti-Christ are the ones who crucified Jesus. The Anti-Christ are the Jews.
The only way into Heaven is through Jesus. The Anti-Christ are destined for Hell and are therefore inherently evil.
Religious Christians are required by their religion to exterminate the Jews.
Then there are Christians, who don't believe the mythology, but are Christian because they want to help; because they want to participate.
You don't have to believe the mythology to participate in the extermination of the Jews.
Anyone trying to stop people from uniting and exterminating the Anti-Christ are Jewish puppets.
Stop being a Jewish puppet pushing the Jew's biggest agenda.