This is dygenic. These may-december matings are a direct assault by elite males on middle and lower class males of the society.
I consider these pairings “polygyny adjacent” or “ polygyny lite” because they cause the same societal problems that polygyny does, i.e. corruption, wealth disparity, violence, rapey cultures, shithole countries.
The european countries with the highest age disparities historically are the shittiest (see hajnal line). Countries with the least age disparities (germanic, NW Europe) are the nicest most egalitarian countries with the least corruption.
Egalitiarianism is good. Alot of people think its a commie scheme because jews use it alot in their propaganda. But it comes naturally to populations with the highest levels of monogamy. When every young male comes of age in such a population , he marries a female of his own age because they are widely available. The germanic barbarians were doing this in cicero’s time. It is only when elites (typically warrior castes) start hoarding young females that you then create a scarcity of available chaste females. In this scenario the most aggressive males will out-reproduce the “nice guys”.
Centuries after their ancestors’ last warlording days, european aristocratic males and much of the bourgeoisie delayed marriage until their thirties or later, making whores of peasant women in their young years and littering the countryside with their bastards. Later they married much younger upper class women it expedient alliances.
This behavior undermines the basis of white civilized society. Males will always evolve to start killing, stealing and raping to outdo other males in a society where some men can successfully mate with more than one female. Have you ever heard of game theory? Evolution? All that shit is real.
There is exactly one female for every white 20 year old male on this earth looking to score a white non-whore. How many has leonardo gone through? You are clueless, oblivious to the ramifications of this behavior— the very consequences you faggots moan about daily. How many times do I have to hear about the average white woman’s body count?
If males are not married off rapidly they will start turning pure women into whores. Elites are in the best position to do this. Later they will buy a virgin after they are done with whoreing and the rest of the male population is left to their sloppy seconds and bastards in tow.
But you are rooting for Leonardo to fuck as many as possible and give them all VD cuz bros before hos or whatever. The cognitive dissonance is spectacular.
Leonardo, Trump, Mel, Clinton, —theyre all the same. Its genetics. A population full of guys like that wont be a civilized stable nation. They are like africanized bees. Their genes are a pathogen to white civilization.
Reproduction is everybody’s business. Are you ok with white women fucking niggers, if they consent? No? How ‘bout faggots fucking? Nope? Because sex is everyone’s busness. This POS elite (a CIA puppet btw) is dysgenic. Take a lesson from the Karens, because they’re right on this. He and men like him are the reason why you faggots cant find nice girls.
Its game theory. Either males agree to an equitable distribution of females— a limited resource— or society becomes a free for all in which the most aggressive ‘rent seeking’ males out-reproduce the more cooperative productive ones, which leads to the dysgenic result of a population full of rent seeking, super horny males.
Thats what happened to the middle east. That is why southern europe is a shit show.
For every old rich male who marries a 20 something trophy wife, there is necessarily created a 20 something working class incel who must meet his biological urges by fapping to porn or fucking hookers. This is why the elites promote porn and prostitution. It eliminates a threat from angry horny working class males. Porn and prostitution in turn make chaste available females even more scarce than they already were.
The problem is wealthy older men reproducing with more than one female and reproducing with much younger females. The best most stable countries are monogamous and have small age disparity between grooms and brides. This promotes cooperative productive males not rent seeking ones. Its a math problem.
Do you understand math? 2+ 2 is always 4. Do you think math is more flexible when we are dealing with 100,000,000 people? It isnt.
Ive made this argument many many times. No one has ever given me a logical rebuttal as to why I might be wrong. Which Im not. Cry for your butt buddy. You can’t disprove what Im saying.
Thats what muslims say. The most aggressive men in their countries all had 100 babies and lived off slavery. Now all their males are aggressive males that want 100 women and 100 babies and 100 slaves to support their harems. Do you see how this is a pyramid scheme that inevitiably devolves into a shitholistan?
Middle easterners are all more aggressive sexually than europeans. Your argument that incels are dysgenic because they are not aggressive enough is ridiculous. The middle east STILL has incels. They have even MORE incels than we have. How can this be? Because they have simply moved the bar on how aggressive one has to be in order to reproduce . That means less productivity and more fraud, theft, violence and enslavement to get ahead.
You can never solve the “problem” of incels in the way you suggest. The only reason males need to be aggressive in the first place is to fend off other aggressive males which is a circular problem. The bad genetics is “chads”, and they have conquered you. You are the incel in this scenario. Youve been suckered and exed out of evolution because you were not aggressive. Niggers are plenty aggressive, so are jews and muslims and latinos. Youre race is being exterminated because of its lack of aggression.
“Incels” make nice countries. Monogamists make nice countries. There is no example of a “chad” producing a nice country. They only conquer and live off others. Chads are dysgenic. Chads are race mixers. They are inherently unstable.
Except you forgot we are white so we won't do that. If everyone in the population was physically attractive than we would have no problems. And to say chads are dysgenic is laughable! They are chads because of their looks, not because of their behavior! Behavior comes from your life circumstance, ugly people are bitter and angry, attractive people are happy and nice. Ugly men have to rape or hire hookers in order to reproduce, get rid of them and you solved the problem. Check-mate.
Except you forgot we are white so we won't do that.
You believe this because you do not understand how evolution works. Behavioral changes can happen very rapidly to a civilization. White people have only “acted white” for a relatively short period. There are a unique set of conditions that selected for model white behavior. Cold climates selected for patrilineality and monogamy. Agriculture selected for increased productivity and respect for private property. Market economies selected for increased IQ. Christianity enforced monogamy which lowered aggression. It also prevented priests from breeding, which is how jews evolved— ie., jews descend from a corrupt priestly caste.
We cant say for sure exactly what influence all these factors and others may have had but we know these forces that made us “white” are greatly weakened or not in play any more. That means that even if there was no introgression into our population from niggers and spics and jews, a force of ENTROPY will continue to weaken our race and our behavior will “de-evolve” because we are no longer subject to the selective pressures that made us the best and eliminated the worst from our population.
Why are we not more like niggers? Intense selective forces for our intelligence and cooperativity. When they are removed, we deteriorate because good times makes weak men.
Genes for parasitic modes of men are always lurking in human populations. Because humans are social (essentially eusocial), parasitic lineages can become highly successful reproductively through warlording/enslavement or by deception (often by priestly bureacrats). When either of these types breed endogamously, a new parasitic strain will arise. Neither of these groups produce their own wealth. They feed of other groups.
Plenty of whites have fallen into these categories, and have enslaved and exploited or genocided other whites. We just have had less of these genetic subtypes in our population because of pressures which eliminated them, or made them less successful, compared to caucasoids of the middle east, who started out more or less the same as us.
You cannot say, “oh those people act that way because they are from bad groups” without being able to explain how those groups became bad. How did jews become so bad ? Why did ashkhenazi jews who became mixed with europeans not become better people compared to middle eastern jews? How did middle easterners become so violent and stupid when once they built pyamids? Why are Irish Travellers so criminal? Why are Japanese more honest than Chinese? Do you have explanations for these things? Because I DO!
And to say chads are dysgenic is laughable! They are chads because of their looks, not because of their behavior!
Not in my usage here
Behavior comes from your life circumstance, ugly people are bitter and angry, attractive people are happy and nice.
No, that is such a jewish take! Who told you that, your jewish psychotherapist? Behavior comes from genes, duh. That is why muslims and blacks and spics are more violent and corrupt regardless of looks. That is why good looking jews are still manipulative and exploitive.
Ugly men can get laid easily if they obtain enough power over other men. Then, honest men who work hard and women who prefer honest men will be out-bred by dishonest powerful men and women who are ‘hypergamous’. Its a dysgenic scenario.
I have truth which is better. Everything that we ibserve in politics, economics and culture can be explained through evolution. Once we understand how sex selection mechanisms work it should be a snap to engineer a stable society.
You have incorrect beliefs about how “whiteness” evolved and how it works. You dont want to believe that we can lose it. We can.
The countries with the smallest average age disparity between bride and groom have the highest level of monogamy (historically) and the highest IQs in europe, and that is the germanic countries. Why are the germanics better than the slavs and the celts? Because of egalitarian marriage patterns.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 9, 2023 14:13:56 ago (+1/-0)*
This is dygenic. These may-december matings are a direct assault by elite males on middle and lower class males of the society.
I consider these pairings “polygyny adjacent” or “ polygyny lite” because they cause the same societal problems that polygyny does, i.e. corruption, wealth disparity, violence, rapey cultures, shithole countries.
The european countries with the highest age disparities historically are the shittiest (see hajnal line). Countries with the least age disparities (germanic, NW Europe) are the nicest most egalitarian countries with the least corruption.
Egalitiarianism is good. Alot of people think its a commie scheme because jews use it alot in their propaganda. But it comes naturally to populations with the highest levels of monogamy. When every young male comes of age in such a population , he marries a female of his own age because they are widely available. The germanic barbarians were doing this in cicero’s time. It is only when elites (typically warrior castes) start hoarding young females that you then create a scarcity of available chaste females. In this scenario the most aggressive males will out-reproduce the “nice guys”.
Centuries after their ancestors’ last warlording days, european aristocratic males and much of the bourgeoisie delayed marriage until their thirties or later, making whores of peasant women in their young years and littering the countryside with their bastards. Later they married much younger upper class women it expedient alliances.
This behavior undermines the basis of white civilized society. Males will always evolve to start killing, stealing and raping to outdo other males in a society where some men can successfully mate with more than one female. Have you ever heard of game theory? Evolution? All that shit is real.
There is exactly one female for every white 20 year old male on this earth looking to score a white non-whore. How many has leonardo gone through? You are clueless, oblivious to the ramifications of this behavior— the very consequences you faggots moan about daily. How many times do I have to hear about the average white woman’s body count?
If males are not married off rapidly they will start turning pure women into whores. Elites are in the best position to do this. Later they will buy a virgin after they are done with whoreing and the rest of the male population is left to their sloppy seconds and bastards in tow.
But you are rooting for Leonardo to fuck as many as possible and give them all VD cuz bros before hos or whatever. The cognitive dissonance is spectacular.
Leonardo, Trump, Mel, Clinton, —theyre all the same. Its genetics. A population full of guys like that wont be a civilized stable nation. They are like africanized bees. Their genes are a pathogen to white civilization.
Reproduction is everybody’s business. Are you ok with white women fucking niggers, if they consent? No? How ‘bout faggots fucking? Nope? Because sex is everyone’s busness. This POS elite (a CIA puppet btw) is dysgenic. Take a lesson from the Karens, because they’re right on this. He and men like him are the reason why you faggots cant find nice girls.
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2023 14:49:43 ago (+1/-0)
@big_fat_dangus you got to see this lmao
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2023 15:40:23 ago (+0/-1)
Thats what happened to the middle east. That is why southern europe is a shit show.
For every old rich male who marries a 20 something trophy wife, there is necessarily created a 20 something working class incel who must meet his biological urges by fapping to porn or fucking hookers. This is why the elites promote porn and prostitution. It eliminates a threat from angry horny working class males. Porn and prostitution in turn make chaste available females even more scarce than they already were.
The problem is wealthy older men reproducing with more than one female and reproducing with much younger females. The best most stable countries are monogamous and have small age disparity between grooms and brides. This promotes cooperative productive males not rent seeking ones. Its a math problem.
Do you understand math? 2+ 2 is always 4. Do you think math is more flexible when we are dealing with 100,000,000 people? It isnt.
Ive made this argument many many times. No one has ever given me a logical rebuttal as to why I might be wrong. Which Im not. Cry for your butt buddy. You can’t disprove what Im saying.
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2023 17:45:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2023 18:09:34 ago (+0/-1)
Middle easterners are all more aggressive sexually than europeans. Your argument that incels are dysgenic because they are not aggressive enough is ridiculous. The middle east STILL has incels. They have even MORE incels than we have. How can this be? Because they have simply moved the bar on how aggressive one has to be in order to reproduce . That means less productivity and more fraud, theft, violence and enslavement to get ahead.
You can never solve the “problem” of incels in the way you suggest. The only reason males need to be aggressive in the first place is to fend off other aggressive males which is a circular problem. The bad genetics is “chads”, and they have conquered you. You are the incel in this scenario. Youve been suckered and exed out of evolution because you were not aggressive. Niggers are plenty aggressive, so are jews and muslims and latinos. Youre race is being exterminated because of its lack of aggression.
“Incels” make nice countries. Monogamists make nice countries. There is no example of a “chad” producing a nice country. They only conquer and live off others. Chads are dysgenic. Chads are race mixers. They are inherently unstable.
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2023 19:49:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2023 21:47:46 ago (+0/-0)
You believe this because you do not understand how evolution works. Behavioral changes can happen very rapidly to a civilization. White people have only “acted white” for a relatively short period. There are a unique set of conditions that selected for model white behavior. Cold climates selected for patrilineality and monogamy. Agriculture selected for increased productivity and respect for private property. Market economies selected for increased IQ. Christianity enforced monogamy which lowered aggression. It also prevented priests from breeding, which is how jews evolved— ie., jews descend from a corrupt priestly caste.
We cant say for sure exactly what influence all these factors and others may have had but we know these forces that made us “white” are greatly weakened or not in play any more. That means that even if there was no introgression into our population from niggers and spics and jews, a force of ENTROPY will continue to weaken our race and our behavior will “de-evolve” because we are no longer subject to the selective pressures that made us the best and eliminated the worst from our population.
Why are we not more like niggers? Intense selective forces for our intelligence and cooperativity. When they are removed, we deteriorate because good times makes weak men.
Genes for parasitic modes of men are always lurking in human populations. Because humans are social (essentially eusocial), parasitic lineages can become highly successful reproductively through warlording/enslavement or by deception (often by priestly bureacrats). When either of these types breed endogamously, a new parasitic strain will arise. Neither of these groups produce their own wealth. They feed of other groups.
Plenty of whites have fallen into these categories, and have enslaved and exploited or genocided other whites. We just have had less of these genetic subtypes in our population because of pressures which eliminated them, or made them less successful, compared to caucasoids of the middle east, who started out more or less the same as us.
You cannot say, “oh those people act that way because they are from bad groups” without being able to explain how those groups became bad. How did jews become so bad ? Why did ashkhenazi jews who became mixed with europeans not become better people compared to middle eastern jews? How did middle easterners become so violent and stupid when once they built pyamids? Why are Irish Travellers so criminal? Why are Japanese more honest than Chinese? Do you have explanations for these things? Because I DO!
Ugly men can get laid easily if they obtain enough power over other men. Then, honest men who work hard and women who prefer honest men will be out-bred by dishonest powerful men and women who are ‘hypergamous’. Its a dysgenic scenario.
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2023 22:06:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2023 22:24:31 ago (+0/-0)
You have incorrect beliefs about how “whiteness” evolved and how it works. You dont want to believe that we can lose it. We can.
The countries with the smallest average age disparity between bride and groom have the highest level of monogamy (historically) and the highest IQs in europe, and that is the germanic countries. Why are the germanics better than the slavs and the celts? Because of egalitarian marriage patterns.
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2023 00:04:36 ago (+0/-0)