Sign into an existing account

Women are the foot soldiers for the jews.

There is 2000 years of example of white males collaborating with jews. White males invited jews into our lands and did business with them. You have a pathological inability to “notice” that white males were 100% responsible for the decisions that brought jews and niggers into our lives until just 100 years ago. Im hear to remind dried up old drunks who try to blame white women for the problems created by white males. Its the truth and you know it.

Im not surprised, it’s a very emotional reaction. Human beings are irrational and emotional, men are so every bit as much as women.

Some particularly emotional irrational men on this site selectively “notice” only when females are doing something wrong and then try to ascribe their behavior to all women. Their eyes are closed to the fact that, for example, men were 100% in charge of politics when we abandoned ethnic citizenship for a civil one.

Men destroyed our ethnonations. Men invited jews into our lands and bought slaves and vice from them.

Im prepared to let all that go when you guys decide to be objective and logical about your characterizations of women.


If there’s one thing this site has taught me is that men can simply not be trusted with all the power. So thanks for that.

It applies to men as much as women.

.>All those mistakes are made by men, you think women had zero part in that?

You can’t have it both ways: “things were better when men were in charge, repeal the 19th” ...but also “hey, women wanted the civil war too!“ You see the problem? It is because you are biased and irrational and will only seek out factoids that support your emotional predisposition.


This is a false belief. Why do men fight wars? For the same reason two male sheep lock horns. For the same reason no women ever had a war. Sexual competition.

Males have cheap reproduction therefore it malkes sense for males to try to steal each others females or kill (or enslave) one another and steal each others’ territory in order to steal each others’ females. Its a behavior that can never benefit females, who are physically limited in their reproduction.

All war is caused by the same reason two stags or two silverbacks or two roosters go at it. Its male intrasexual selection.


You do it to steal us. But let’s say you are a peaceful male that just wants a sole female and you are trying to defend her from an army of aggressive male female-hoarders. Females are still not the cause of this.

MGTOWS spend all day citing female traits and trying to twist them into something evil, or picking out rando female fuckups and attributing them to all women. And now, you think you are going to prove to me that the ugliest of all male traits— the one that causes the majority of the inefficiency, violence and corruption on the planet — happens because we women want you to do it, because women really like polygyny, right? No.

Men go to war for more women or better women or more money for better and more women, period. War is always to benefit one male at the expense of another. That does not beneifit women at all, it demotes us to chattel.

Men make up all kinds of stories (they may even believe!) about why some war is justified. But always, it is some elite male who sees an opportunity to increase his power and can sell this opportunity to some lesser males to fight for him in exchange for a cut of the booty— some other males’ stolen wealth; thats how you get the best females! European men have been killing each other for thousands of years in just such wars.

To reach true objectivity you need to recognize that this is excess destructive male competition and it is inherently male. It is not rational and it is indeed emotion based behavior.

You want to attribute irrational emotional behavior only to females. You have a bias. It is immature


White european men were doing this before jews ever came to europe. The greeks did it, the romans did it. Fucking over their fellow males for reproductive benefit. Its the basis of slavery and all empires. White elites partnered with jews to exploit their fellow whites for the same reason.

Strict monogamy is the antidote to war and corruption because it prevents aggressive males from outbreeding cooperative ones. It prevents thieves and enslavers and murderers and scammers from outbreeding farmers and builders. All these behaviors are implemented through the male hormonal system. Stop blaming females for it.

The concept of avoiding damaging behaviors is valid for both males and females. It's prudent to avoid levels of risk perceived to exceed one's consequence standards.

It's the reason why the behavior of "a MGTOW" is self-projected to be damaging in the first place that's the real issue. Strip away all the nuance and it boils down to "I suck".

Add a little nuance back in and it's effectively a perception that the MGTOWs skills and abilities at successfully mating fall short of the current requirements.