×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
11
6 comments block


[ - ] prototype 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 21, 2023 03:22:36 ago (+2/-1)

thats just standard well poisoning.

"look, they received funding from xyz!"

JOK has no say over who can or cannot donate to PV.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod [op] -1 points 2.3 yearsFeb 21, 2023 04:08:50 ago (+0/-1)

there's no level of cope you guys won't go to once you're conned into latching onto something. the place was already crawling with jewish staff before james got outed, which is probably just a publicity stunt. reminds of me this quote:

"Problem is, you can't rise to power over Christians without pretending to be Christian. Fortunately, once you're "in", the Christians will forgive you over and over and over and make incessant excuses for your disloyal behavior. So you just have to get their trust once and then you can do whatever you want. Once they trust you, it's hard as fuck to lose public support from a Christian."

[ - ] prototype 2 points 2.3 yearsFeb 21, 2023 04:50:07 ago (+2/-0)

there's no level of cope

lol, thats all you fucking got? "muh cope! muh precious cope!".

I criticized him in another post long before you ever did.

You've completely skipped over the essential argument: james does not control who donates to the org--at all.

Maybe i'll go solicit donations from a bunch of fucking queers for your sex change operation, and then call you a tranny because people you don't know donated to you.

See my point?

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 21, 2023 04:58:14 ago (+1/-0)

cope if u think they randomly donated 100k without any dialogue

[ - ] prototype 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 21, 2023 05:11:34 ago (+1/-0)

cope if u think they randomly donated 100k without any dialogue

thats fair but you're also assuming something atop of an assumption already, neither of which is proof.
I'd say you're probably right, but accepting a donation is different from an endorsement.
Were that not the case, we wouldn't be seeing james booted over the pfizer scandal.

[ - ] beece 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 21, 2023 12:59:47 ago (+0/-0)*

Per the article, the San Francisco Jewish Federation gave Veritas $100,000 in 2016. The Voat post title makes it appear that they have been getting funded SINCE 2016, but that is likely to not be the case. Muh cope. I know math is difficult for some here, but that's like almost 5 years ago (/s) and they haven't given any since. My guess is that since PV tagged Pfizer, no more money will follow O'keefe.