Sign into an existing account

Its just RETARDS being called "autistic. Retarded kids dropped the same percent share as autism seemed to rise.

Its simply "Euphemism Drift", not vaccines



Euphemism Drift
==========

Euphemisms keep creeping and changing. (Euphemism Drift). Negro, Nigger, Colored, Colored People, Black, People of Color, finally African Americans!

No one wants to be a Negro , so they just keep changing the term to more syllables.


RETARD Euphemism Drift too!
===

RETARDATION DROPPED 277 fold in decades from Euphemism drift!
==========

in 1970 there were astounding amounts of RETARDED KIDS

In 2022 all parents claim they have AUTISTIC Kids, and no parents seem to ever have a RETARDED KID

Its a euphemism drift.

'Retarded' now INCORRECTLY uses 'Autistic' as its euphemism.

In the last 15 years, the number of retards in USA plummeted 90% , but the number of so-called "autistic" skyrocket the same amount almost 900% up! In the last 50 years the number is 277 fold ( 27,700 % less retards )

All retards are now mislabled as "autistic"

Even though there is/was a real thing called autism before it was infested with retards....

The first autism prevalence study (1970): less than 1 in 10,000 kids. Recently the autism rate in the U.S: 1 in 36 kids (2017) - a 27,000% (277-fold) increase in 50 years. Now its 1 in 35. All retards are called "Autistic" , ruining the term.

RETARDATION DROPPED 277 fold in same time!

No one wants to be "retarded", a proper medical term.

= = = = = =

The word for mobile handicapped Cripple originally was "Hirple". It was Hirple before 1300. Then they changed it to be Cripple (a similar ancient word) to be less derogatory, as no one wanted to be called Hirple.

Soon, cripples did not want to be called CRIPPLED, so they changed it again to DISABLED.

Then the DISABLED did not want to be called DISABLED, so they changed the euphemism to HANDICAPPED

Then from HANDICAPPED to CHALLENGED, then to DISABLED PERSON, then DIFFERENTLY-ABLED, then from DIFFERENTLY ABLED, to HANDICAPABLE, then to SPECIAL.

(For one year the SJWs tried to leave "Special" behind and steal the word "GIFTED" but it did not take.)

That "Euphemism Drift" is caused when a group of people do not want to be named and the term is banned as an attack on them.


Its the same thing with RETARDED. No one wants to be a RETARDED so they keep inventing new ways to not be called RETARDED, like "autistic" (even though there is/was a real thing called autism before it was infested with retards.)

medical terms:
=======

The old Medical term for Retarded was Moron (1846)

https://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2017/03/06/the-word-and-challenging-history-words-for-dummies/6heGdgEkMRaUw4MPYVF6yN/story.html

https://www.mentalhelp.net/intellectual-disabilities/history-of-stigmatizing-names-for-intellectual-disabilities-continued/

Idiot. Imbecile. Cretin. Feebleminded. Moron. Retarded. Are all IQ medical ranges :

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/sunday-review/giving-a-name-and-dignity-to-a-disability.html

Its the same thing with RETARDED. No one wants to be a RETARDED so they keep inventing new ways to not be called RETARDED, like 'autistic' (even though there is/was a real thing called autism before it was infested with retards.)



medical terms (idiot , moron) became this sequence of replacements ... - retarded became
- Slow became
- Special became
- Cognitive Disability became
- Intellectual disability became
- autistic became
- PDD- Persistent development delay became
- "future multisyllable nonsense euphemism to come"

All my friends use the word NEGROS in mixed company and "Dirty Niggers " in family settings.


TL/DR: Euphemism Drift is a new word to replace an old word when no one wants to be the old word. Autism did not increase, its just Black retards are all mislabeled as autistic

Ha!

Unfortunately no vaccine is safe. Such a thing does not exist, because every single working model for a "vaccine" is to irritate the immune system.

Vaccines do not provide any nutrition. It's not like eating a banana. It's injecting a toxin to elicit an adverse response. It's like playing with a stick of dynamite hoping it just blows up a little, but not too much.

In addition, the whole model of vaccines is to produce antibodies, but antibodies are not your whole immune system. Since antibodies are not your whole immune system, the premise on which vaccines are built upon to produce immunity, or let alone the promise to produce "health" on any level, is just wrong.

This flawed view of immunity is explained very well in this video:

https://youtu.be/6lqPFZd3GTw

Lastly understand this: the metric of "immunity" that is used by vaccinologists does not equal "health", or "long life". Their metric is "lots of antibodies", but "lots of antibodies" does not mean you are healthy, or that you will live without chronic disease.

Vaccines guarantee no such thing. They only guarantee antibodies.

So if you want lots of antibodies, go for vaccines. But if you want health, longevity, and freedom from chronic diseases, you need something else.

only when their lips are not moving

Hey mang don leevus speeks out bish!