×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
1

We go to zimbabwe in great numbers, we dominate that place and kick the blacks out, then we expand and conquer south africa too. Next, we form an empire that goes around claiming all of africa as the white ethnostate and evicting blacks as we go.

submitted by AntiPostmodernist to whatever 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 19:36:38 ago (+6/-5)     (whatever)

After that we start taking the middle east and maybe take the entire third world as our own.
Do the great replacers want europe, america, and oceania? They can have it, but we'll be taking their lands in return.
In time we will be taking our homelands back as well, I guarantee it.
You'd have to be retarded not to support this genius approach.


43 comments block


[ - ] Questionable_2 3 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 20:07:05 ago (+3/-0)

I like your sentiment but, can't we just retake over the places we already live? We're a fierce people that have gotten lost in the filth of the world, we don't need to take Africa, we need to take back what's ours.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 21:47:53 ago (+0/-0)*

I like your sentiment but, can't we just retake over the places we already live?

Why haven't you? It's 2023, we've been talking about it since 2015, earlier even.

Those years pass you by and nothing happens in your life, you just grow older, weaker dumber. You body breaks down and your mind follows the body.

What do you suggest? Is it more of the same? It's more of the same isn't it.

How about an actual analysis of the pros and cons to my plans vs the plans you've presented?

Oh wait, you don't have any ideas. I guess my ideas win by default then.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 3 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 22:59:23 ago (+3/-0)*

Why haven't you? What does bitching on the internet achieve other than fake points and attention falling on this website? Who are you to say other people here aren't already quietly walking the walk without advertising it for fake points?

- con to your plan - losing our homes and having to spend time rebuilding in a shithole and being too busy working to defend ourselves.

- pro to your plan - absolutely nothing. Just like the fucking dickheads that fleed the communist pedophiles in Victoria for sunny Queensland, they achieved absolutely nothing of value, spent half their hard earned running, and the tyranny they were running from just followed them.

Running will not do anything but make the white man look like a complete pussy and gives the mongrel hoards more confidence to do it next time.

Stand your fucking ground and defend your home. Demoralisers will fucking hang.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 10:46:29 ago (+0/-0)

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 3 points 11 hours ago (+3/-0)*

Why haven't you? What does bitching on the internet achieve other than fake points and attention falling on this website? Who are you to say other people here aren't already quietly walking the walk without advertising it for fake points?

If they are, they aren't doing a good job of it. All the food has been replaced with poisons. Most of the people have had poison injected into them. The air is full of damaging radiation. Our countries are already minority white, we just haven't realized it yet. We've lost freedom and privacy at unmatched levels. The children are completely brainwashed out of touch with reality. Everyone is too distracted by drag queens to give a damn about racial issues anymore, the great replacement is effectively invisible now. What the hell is being accomplished here?

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 22:58:06 ago (+1/-0)

Or, right, OR.... we could stay exactly where we are and kick the Africans out of the countries we built.

Bailing to Africa and starting again seems like a very Jewish idea. There is a reason they want us out of the nations we spent centuries building.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 11:00:48 ago (+1/-0)

(+1/-0)
Or, right, OR.... we could stay exactly where we are and kick the Africans out of the countries we built.

Ok so when are we going to do that? How about 20 years ago? Becaue that's how long we've been talking about it.

Your plan sucks, if it was good we'd have accomplished our goals by now.

Bailing to Africa and starting again seems like a very Jewish idea. There is a reason they want us out of the nations we spent centuries building.

Doing the difficult thing to protect your people is jewish.
Ok yeah, that's what jews have done in the past, and the jews control everything now.

We go there we get:

- most whites are pro white.
- the food, water, and air is not poisoned.
- mind pollution is gone, allowing us to raise multiple generations of whites who put their people first. The relative absence of this degenerate ethnomasochist culture is not to be understated.
- blacks who welcome and appreciate our presence, we use them for protection and as an army.
- local economic dominance and sovereignty.
- segregated white microethnostates that grow to overtake their countries and expand into surrounding African countries.

Etc.

Whites dominate in africa because we evolved in Europe, we are like an invasive species there, we take over and control everything. From there we can take the entire world.

You just hate that things have gotten this bad, that a change of address is the best hope we have.

I've noticed that no one here has an alternative solution, so you lazy fucks can go neck yourselves.

We migrated some of our people into the Americas and into Oceania, why are you opposed to resettling Africa?

If you think the countries of the planet will all just attack us when we are going to a country that requests our presence, improving everything for the locals who are black, and vacating western countries of its racists, you have a screw loose.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 23:21:20 ago (+0/-0)

How? When?

[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 21:16:58 ago (+1/-0)

Let’s get the niggers out of the United States before we try it at the nigger homeland. What do you say?

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 22:02:06 ago (+1/-1)*

Why haven't we already? It's 2023. Not 2015, not 2008, not 2000. We aren't moving, time to take another path.

Answer my question: what do we do and when do we do it?

It doesn't have to stated here could be elsewhere.

The people who are standing against the system today are different from those who did so in the mid 2010s, and they are different from the ones who did so in the 2000s, all this time the agenda moves forwards.

Freedoms are restricted, including the ones that could have allowed us to change the course of history from its present path.

Basically I'm offering you something and you are offering me nothing.

We go to Zimbabwe we immediately get a few advantages.
All the white people are most likely ourguys, we make up the majority of our own race in the region, that's good.
All the food is produced by us, we know it's not poisoned.
We've gotten away from the surveillance state we currently live under.
We have less rules and beurocracy holding us back.
We also get away from all the propaganda being shoved down our gullets everyday here, allowing us to raise our children relatively free from yid propaganda.
We'd be healthier physically and mentally, able to breathe easier, think more clearly, and live more authentically.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 23:38:43 ago (+0/-1)

deleted

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 2 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 11:02:00 ago (+2/-0)

Fuck you, cancerous piece of shit.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 11:29:59 ago (+0/-1)*

deleted

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 12:21:39 ago (+0/-0)

You can't be more wrong about me.

Seethe feddie. Seethe harder.

[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 20:05:54 ago (+1/-0)

You'd have to be retarded not to support this genius approach.
This is projection. Your idea is as retarded as it gets.

[ - ] HeavyBrain 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 20:04:32 ago (+1/-0)

There are better countries there with more minerals, but the chinks are already on them.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 21:49:03 ago (+0/-0)

We will take them from the Chinese, it'll be easier there than it is here.

There's a lot less to hold us back, and im talking about this internally and externally.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 23:05:29 ago (+1/-0)

So you want us to leave our homes where we already have these things, to try and take it from another sovereign nation who outnumbers us.

Genius. Sheer genius. If your aim is to waste time energy and wealth on another forever war.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 12:21:00 ago (+0/-0)*

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 13 hours ago (+0/-0)

So you want us to leave our homes where we already have these things, to try and take it from another sovereign nation who outnumbers us.

What do we have here? I think you're living in lalaland if you think we have some sort of advantage here. We don't.

We've got nothing, we are outnumbered here already, and what we have here is a series of as of yet insurmountable obstacles between us and getting anything we want.

It won't be a violent war, we will go there and beat them with dominance in numbers and economic power.

We will set up a segregated white community in Zimbabwe, we will grow to power by our control of the economy through agriculture.

We will overwhelm them with our birthrates and raise a generation of race loyal children. While at the same time expanding our territory through aggressive land purchasing.

These are things we could do there that we cannot do here.

We will send these children out into surrounding African countries to establish segregated communities there, same process as above.

We'd be unstoppable.

What would the western world do to stop us?

Attack a developing nation that's newly reviving its economic strength after white people move there because black Zimbabweans are requesting it?

If they try an old trick it won't work because we have bevome wise to it.

The blacks there are desperately pleading for our presence.

We play this smart, no large military moves unless absolutely necessary, but we will be building up a war machine just in case.

Justified by the needs of white Africans to protect themselves from blacks.

We will gradually replace the demographics of Africa, forcing blacks out abd into Europe without firing a shot.

There will be some covert acts of violence, against any who stand in the way of the plan, and this will be conducted through organized crime rings we will establish there.

We will seek political power to fominate all the governments of African countries, and pass laws that disproportionately benefit whites and white expansion.

Basically we will be taking pages from the jews and blacks, doing there what was done to us.

We will comply with the world bank for a time until we are able to flip the script on them.

It's a long game. Lots of farming. But living in towns like orenia that grow to cities and then take over whole countries.

It's an empire established in this way.

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 13:31:58 ago (+0/-0)

This shit again? You posted this same thing a while back and never answered some critical questions.

Who pays for it? Who will organize it? Who will you use for military and self defense? How will you get key infrastructure, industry, and agriculture, back to functioning?

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 13:38:55 ago (+0/-0)

The zimbawean govt wants to bring us over.

We can use the internet to coordinate a group exodus.

We could use the local military and make it ours, or we could form our own militias once there.

We are white men, we worked wonders when there wasn't any previously established infrastructure, we will be making another miracle like that one, easy.

We order what we need and the govt will get it for us, if not we can just head our into the nature of Zimbabwe and gather what we need for ourselves.

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 13:55:41 ago (+0/-0)

"We" did nothing of the kind. It was the British who did this at Cecil Rhodes' request after the British colonized South Africa. It brought everything the British empire could offer to establish the new colony Southern Rhodesia, including a charter by the British South Africa Company, some funding by the very wealthy Rhodes himself, British administration and law, a networking system of roads and rail, communications, and specific industries and agriculture then intended to produce based on the land's natural resources. Not to mention men, especially British men, were MUCH tougher than men today.

The niggers in Zimbabwe don't "want" us back, they want gibs because they're incapable of governing themselves. That's not the same as asking us to come in and take it all over. The Rhodesian government left a running government, an intact infrastructure, and a solid currency, and the niggers fucked it all up. Their currency became a laughingstock.

https://justforsneaks.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/zimbabwe-100-trillion-dollar-bill-obverse.jpg

This is a pipe dream, kid.

[ - ] Merlynn 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 12:27:49 ago (+0/-0)

Better idea. Just stop feeding them. They'll starve and we can take over without having to touch a single nigger.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 12:42:23 ago (+0/-0)

Again, I'd like to focus on things we can actually do on reality. Not some unrealistic fantasy.

Is it something you can do? Then why haven't you done it yet?

[ - ] Merlynn 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 11, 2023 14:39:28 ago (+0/-0)

Stop giving to "feed the hungry" charities. Buy food from local growers instead of mega corps. Look into making your own food if possible.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 11:05:43 ago (+0/-0)

If they try to get us to destroy ourselves, we won't.

If they could just come in and kill us off, why haven't they done so already? Why can they militarily annihilate us there but not here?

There are a lot of questions I have regarding your counterpoints.

[ - ] Goatbear 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 03:55:03 ago (+0/-0)

Kek.
Middle east was once white, same as India.

Make a swap, Europe for Africa. In 100 years they would all be dead while Africa and all its resources under white command would turn Africa into white wakanda.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 10:49:40 ago (+0/-0)

That's the plan, we will make africa white while the north turns black and brown.

Better to preserve the blood and forsake the soil than to forsake both by taking a suicide stand against impossible odds.

Only in a distant undeveloped place like Zimbabwe could we breed a white race that has loyalty to itself over other races.

Only with a race like that could we hope to protect ourselves from extinction.

[ - ] localsal 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 21:36:33 ago (+0/-0)

Read about how the Whites lost the countries in the first place.

If you think that the filthy kikes can't make any new settlements give up just like the first ones, you are deluding yourself.

International sanctions and invasions will cripple any wanna-be White countries in any part of the world.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 21:51:48 ago (+0/-0)

We lost those places the first time around becaue we made mistakes we won't be making thw second time round.

Sanctions can be wistood through self sufficiency, invasions can be fought off.

Your points are retarded. All just meaningless excuses for not standing by while real men do the things that fall outside the comfort zone.

Taking risks on a plan that has an actual chance of success, like a man should.

[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 22:10:53 ago (+1/-0)

LMAO. You honestly believe that?

Look at South Africa. It was a nuclear power. A nuclear power.

And because the filthy kikes deemed the Whites so evil, all international sanctions threw the country completely backwards, and the nukes were taken away.

Also, no country in the world has every resource it needs. Japan needed to expand its WW2 empire to get raw materials. Even the US imports a ton of materials - where do you think tesla batteries come from?

True, a country can become self-sufficient - but at a cost, usually in terms of lower quality of life. People can also go "off grid", but will also lose many of the comforts and ease that are afforded in today's world.

If you want to test the ability of Whites (in the US anyway) to create a breakaway country, look at the strip of land just south of Texas. Take about 20 miles of Mexican desert and make a country. Nobody is really using that land anyway. Declare independence. See how long the (((international))) community takes to destroy it.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 22:25:31 ago (+0/-0)

South Africa went down without a fight.

They should have fought instead of caving in to the pressure of the outside world.

But yes, we should be going off and founding new independent nations, or taking over existing nations that are prime for it.

As for the idea of self sufficiently being impossible because of the need for international trade to keep up technologically, we will not stop with one country, we will be expanding as an empire.

We will become like the Mongols, or other conquering people, advancing through conquest and establishment of dominance.

People pretend technology is everything, but it isn't, there's also the value on having the right spirit, if you are Willing to do things the other side isn't prepared to deal with, you have a massive advantage.

Right now the world stage is set so that such a rising power has that advantage.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 23:07:05 ago (+1/-0)

South Africa might have done down without a fight but Rhodesia didn't.

But they fought alone and lost. Because people posing as moderate whites divided them from their brothers overseas.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] -1 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 23:19:42 ago (+0/-1)*

Rhodesia didnt even know who the enemy was, they treated enemies like allies and died for it.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 9, 2023 00:58:33 ago (+0/-0)

They knew exactly who their enemies were and had to leave their homes and abandon their nation to live amongst them after being demonised by their South African neighbours, and the country that forced them to give up their sovereignty while also giving them their only lifeline as commonwealth citizens.

And to this day they still proudly call themselves Rhodesian.

Plenty of people in the west know about the Bush War even if it does get quietly supressed.

[ - ] localsal 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 22:50:58 ago (+0/-0)

People become deluded by lack of exposure to reality. This is as true for the libtarded utopia as it is for any potential White "empire". Not gonna be how you think it is.

You think that retarded chaz utopia situation wouldn't have a similar eventuality as a White one?

How about when Argentina tried to take the Falkland Islands from Great Britain - and Argentina actually had a semi-valid claim. I forget, how did that work out? You don't think the entire kiked world would amass against a burgeoning White empire to wipe it out? Naive at best.

And if that White empire tried to expand? LMAO. There are not many things the world agrees upon, but if any current or emerging nation declared itself a White nation, the UN would vote almost unanimously to condemn it and then bomb it to extinction - which is the goal.

How are your anti-aircraft defenses? Anti-missile? How many tanks will you have?

It took the US about 6 months to amass the army to invade Kuwait in 1990-1991. That was with a lot of negotiations and waiting. Can you get everything you need for victory in 6 months or less?

And to do anything, you would need to convince White men to come and die for your dream utopia. I'm sure most of them would ask these same questions before joining up.

Ok, let's pretend we can be like the Mongols. Is the international community going to wait for the eventual army to knock on their doors? Or will they mobilize to fight immediately?

All ancient warfare tactics are unusable today.

1) communications are instant
2) travel is hours and days, not months like in the 13th century.
3) infrastructure is pretty much established world wide, to allow for supplies and warfare to be conducted anywhere within days and weeks
4) standing armies exist and budgets, not to mention (((politicians))), will jump at the chance to use those armies in a "legal" way.
5) just like with israel, any established nation will be completely open to counter-invasion for a long time. Fending off the local countries might be possible, but eventually the filthy kikes will expand the enemies of the new formed nation.
6) assuming the new country can defend itself against all comers, do you really believe that nukes are off the table? kiked countries would probably not hesitate to launch at any african country either, if there was a gain in it.


The fact that you haven't thought of all of these negatives implies that you have limited experience in the politics of the real world.

Try not paying taxes to the IRS, or even to the local governments. Watch as people with guns show up at your door. Now what? Do you resist to the death? do you surrender and go to jail? do you spend all of your savings on the legal system?

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 10:42:12 ago (+0/-0)

First of all, we will not be immediately dominating with violence, instead it will an economic conquest, we will become the number one spice of food for the entire continent, and we will leverage the fuck out of that angle.

While at the same time we will be building up a war machine with the profits we'd be making on multiple agricultural commodity markets.

We will justify our ethnic policies and military budgets with the history of hostility towards whites in the Continent.

We will also be building up a population of whites that will be sent off into surrounding African countries as immigrants, building up their own insular communities and dominant economies within those countries.

The first priority will be South Africa, we will enter and take it over with immigration and economics.

We will also expand into other forms of markets to completely overtake the African continent with our might in producing goods and delivering them quickly while selling them cheaper than out competitors and still making a quick buck.

We can even go into banking within the African continent, printing good value currency for all the African countries, while playing nicely with the World Bank at first.

We will have a darkside where we simply kill or intimidate anyone who isn't on board with our plans for the eventual african conquest.

We will be setting up an underground of organized crime to aid us in this.

We act sneaky and use deception and covert acts of violence to take over. Like the jews did to us.

Eventually we will have the strength to become openly militaristic conquerors, and by the time that happens we will have a lot of allies within the nation's attacking us cells that we xpuld trigger against the homelands that had made themselves our enemies.

The approach must match the situation.

We will be manufacturing the level of loyalty within our community the same way the jews did long ago, by terrorizing and purging those who did not demonstrate the values of lovee for their people above all others, and a strategically concealed hatred of all other people.

We need to have adult that grows until it overtakes our racial culture and integrates itself into our identities.

The main enemy isn't other races, it's our own, once we have racial unity on par with the jews or even beyond it, we can then start putting plans into place for the usurpation of the global jewish order.

But to achieve that we need to isolate ourselves from the society we live in where the enemy and their ideals rule.

Someplace far off with compromised infrastructure like Zimbabwe is perfect for this.

I'm general you are correct in how we will not be able to compete with the superior military of the western powers, even though we'd have the same terrain advantage that allowed the talisman and isis to cause all kinds of chaos for the us military even though they had severely outdated military technology.

I think if we play this smart we can succeed by going this route.

On top of all this, the racists all leaving, never to return, that's something we can get the normies on board with rather easily.

There are obstacles to the western powers just straight up declaring war on a small country going through an economic revival. Especially when that country is a majority black populated one.

Yes, we can use the blacks as a shield and a spear against the west until we no longer need them, like the jews do.

And we'd be improving the lives of black Africans so much that they'd be appreciate of us, for they will remember what happened last time they kicked us out.

It's going to be numbers and economics at first, using the situation as a way to make it difficult to get the people of western countries to turn their weapons on us, and then we can use that cover to build up an army, navy, air force, and nuclear arsenal in order to repel any opposition to our continued peaceful expansion into completely replacing the demographics of Africa.

We can weaponize leftist politics for the sake of conquest by immigration by bringing up xenophobia and a one sides take on the history of black atrocities against white Africans, we will even seed the lie that Africa was always full of white people, and we will have a lot of means to do it.

Making media depicting African stories and African history but filled to the brim with white people, at first in suppporting roles, then the main cast, then the main characters and important figures.

Diplomacy and optics is an angle you completely overlook here. Zimbabwe wants us to come in and farm for them. Most African nations want white people to return. Even south Africa had the reservations for white people to live on.

We will do to the Africans what the jews did to us, but in our own way. We will actually be doing hard work that improves the lives of others within the continent.

And they will fight for us because of it.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 20:53:39 ago (+0/-1)

deleted

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] -1 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 22:03:21 ago (+0/-1)

The fact that you ate against this shows it to be a good idea.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 23:08:25 ago (+1/-0)

No it shows you as being nothing but a gutless snake in the grass trying to divide brother from brother.

If you want to fuck off to Africa set an example yourself, be a sport, pack your bags, and fuck off. Post pics. I won't run from my home or people.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 11:02:52 ago (+0/-0)

We would be shedding only traitors, not brothers.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 9, 2023 01:01:54 ago (+0/-0)

Brothers don't tell brothers to give up that which they bled for.

So where do you fit in to this picture from my eyes do you think?

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 9, 2023 16:11:50 ago (+0/-0)*

Sunken cost fallacy.

Not even the people who oppose the system today are willing to fight against it in the literal sense.

They don't do anything but put on protests that get ignored and shut down, file lawsuits that get dismissed, or invest themselves in the next candidate who is either a false savior or someone who doesn't stand a chance at getting in.

Even those of us who claim to be considering the option of direct action or physical removal are won't because we know we aren't one man armies and that our countries have become enemy controlled territory since long ago.

I'm offering you a practical solution that works and you are just pulling anything you can out of your asses to argue against it.

It confirms what I've believed for a years now, that you don't want to win.

It's understandable why you are afraid of victory, the third Reich lasted for less than a decade, and while it looked promising at first, so did the aoviet union. This is made worse by the fact that most of the time the third Reich was in power it was either preparing for war or engaged in war, we don't know how well it would've done had it been in place over the course of an extended peacetime.

What if you win, establish national socialism, fend off any attackers, and then your favored political system fails?

Better to speak of what could've been rather than face the reality of how it would actually turn out.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 23:36:44 ago (+0/-1)

deleted