“A lot of people have no clue that agriculture contributes about 33% of all the emissions of the world,” he said during his keynote address. “We can’t get to net-zero, we don’t get this job done unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution. So all of us understand here the depths of this mission.”
--John Kerry delivered these remarks at the Agriculture Innovation Mission (AIM) for Climate Summit held in Washington, D.C.
[ - ] Xantha 1 point 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 15:11:41 ago (+1/-0)
thats also a recipe for massive civil unrest on a scale kikes cannot control. population is like ~350 million people (100 million of them being illegals), but half that population is armed and will not sit around starving in their houses for months at a time. Anyone telling starving people that they can't feed themselves for net-zero carbon emission reasons would get shot immediately. There's no way for them to enforce that without massive unrest, they have to do it more slowly and the kill vax is far more stealthy, since half of the people who took it could be dead in 10 years.
[ - ] Osmanthus 1 point 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 15:54:16 ago (+1/-0)
The headline isn't linked to John Kerry's remarks about the usa, but referencing stuff going on in Europe. And while it is clear he is lining up behind the move to limit some types of farming, he never mentions confiscation in the USA.
But it doesn't matter because the banks own the loans, and the govt is about to own the banks.
Linked article conveniently leaves out what was really said:
"We need economic, social and policy innovation in order to scale adaptation of these technical solutions and get them into the hands of folks in the fields of small farmers on a worldwide basis."
Don't get caught up in the words. Are they forcing Africans, Indians, or Chinese to stop farming? No, only White people whose farming methods they plan to replace with vague language.
We need economic, social and policy innovation in order to scale adaptation of these technical solutions and get them into the hands of folks in the fields of small farmers on a worldwide basis."
I don't know if that's any better, since those small farmers on a worldwide basis will, in all likelihood, mean turd-world countries whose birthrates' main inhibitor is lack of access to food. As the saying goes, "What do you get when you feed a billion starving Africans? 4 Billion starving Africans!" And that technology doesn't necessarily cover the knock-on effects of a burgeoning population, such as non-agricultural pollution and increased demand for resources, like electricity and water (especially water, whose demand doesn't really have any technical solution.) There's also the possibility that the technology will become a critical failure point when the population becomes too enlarged.
Star Trek was right in one respect: higher-technology must not be made available to lesser-developed people as they aren't prepared nor equipped to handle it responsibly.
You can't eat the food, it's all vaxxed and gene modified with the intent to cause you harm.
You can't even eat the people either, as they are the same as the food now.
Can't drink the water, it's also got bad stuff in it meant to kill your posterity.
Most of us aren't able to produce our own food, and even if we were, it'll be hard to find something that wasn't poisoned, and hard to prevent our food sources from getting poisoned.
There is an option, the people within the elite establishment circles have food and water that wasn't poisoned. They likely have a cure on hand for the poison due to how easy it is to accidentally get poisoned within the world they had created. Why else is this stuff they push on us not more rapidly damaging than it is already known to be? On top of this, they likely live in areas where they are at their safest from their own venom.
Lucky for us, we can find their supply of food, medicine, and land, and we can take it from them, be it by brute force or by some other more intelligent means.
I seriously think we need a rehash of the American and French revolutions where the entire head is cut off from the snake. Start at those who hold their power structures up from the bottom, as they are readily accessible and already weakened there, then work your way up the hierarchy. We can forge alliances across the spectrum of politics and religion and demographics, because everyone below the overclass claims to be against the overclass, time to force them all to live by their words. By srtting it up as a revolution against a common enemy with whom everybody is discontent, we could make it into a simple matter like the people vs the rich and powerful. That's what made occupy such a threat, you had White Christian national socialists and black atheist communists, and both were out there protesting the banks and Wall Street traders who ruined the economy. Gather them all together, not just those who are completely like minded, but those who are like minded in that they claim to hate the same people you do. Multipartian class warfare against the head of the serpent. We keep it to a one issue movement, we want to take back the banks and remove the traders, as well as to replace the government, media, academia, and pretty much every institution of power and influence in our society. It's a protest of the people who lack a place within institutional power, and those few who hold all the positions of power and influence in society.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 5 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 13:23:39 ago (+5/-0)
--John Kerry delivered these remarks at the Agriculture Innovation Mission (AIM) for Climate Summit held in Washington, D.C.
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 3 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 12:40:14 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 14:54:57 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Xantha
[ - ] Xantha 1 point 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 15:11:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 16:31:29 ago (+1/-0)
Closer to ~350mil with an additional ~200mil illegals. Half of which are "legal" now.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 15:41:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager
[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 2 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 16:24:32 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 14:53:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 0 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 21:20:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] KangarooFucker
[ - ] KangarooFucker 1 point 2 yearsMay 22, 2023 04:18:42 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] peety
[ - ] peety 1 point 2 yearsMay 22, 2023 01:40:13 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 1 point 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 19:53:44 ago (+1/-0)
It's CO2...by reducing CO2 during a solar minimum it will cause a massive temperature shift, also C02 is barely high enough to support plant life
if it drops much more we can't farm at all...regardless if you have land...
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 2 yearsMay 22, 2023 00:39:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Osmanthus
[ - ] Osmanthus 1 point 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 15:54:16 ago (+1/-0)
And while it is clear he is lining up behind the move to limit some types of farming, he never mentions confiscation in the USA.
But it doesn't matter because the banks own the loans, and the govt is about to own the banks.
They are going for the great reset, communism.
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 1 point 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 14:09:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 14:44:43 ago (+0/-0)
Whats the emission rate of a corpse?
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes 1 point 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 11:56:11 ago (+2/-1)
Source article says nothing of the sort.
Linked article conveniently leaves out what was really said:
But nevermind those fuckin' facts.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull 1 point 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 14:08:34 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 15:54:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] La_Chalupacabra
[ - ] La_Chalupacabra 0 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 13:02:35 ago (+0/-0)
I don't know if that's any better, since those small farmers on a worldwide basis will, in all likelihood, mean turd-world countries whose birthrates' main inhibitor is lack of access to food.
As the saying goes, "What do you get when you feed a billion starving Africans? 4 Billion starving Africans!"
And that technology doesn't necessarily cover the knock-on effects of a burgeoning population, such as non-agricultural pollution and increased demand for resources, like electricity and water (especially water, whose demand doesn't really have any technical solution.)
There's also the possibility that the technology will become a critical failure point when the population becomes too enlarged.
Star Trek was right in one respect: higher-technology must not be made available to lesser-developed people as they aren't prepared nor equipped to handle it responsibly.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 0 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 20:52:58 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 19:46:48 ago (+0/-0)
You can't even eat the people either, as they are the same as the food now.
Can't drink the water, it's also got bad stuff in it meant to kill your posterity.
Most of us aren't able to produce our own food, and even if we were, it'll be hard to find something that wasn't poisoned, and hard to prevent our food sources from getting poisoned.
There is an option, the people within the elite establishment circles have food and water that wasn't poisoned.
They likely have a cure on hand for the poison due to how easy it is to accidentally get poisoned within the world they had created.
Why else is this stuff they push on us not more rapidly damaging than it is already known to be?
On top of this, they likely live in areas where they are at their safest from their own venom.
Lucky for us, we can find their supply of food, medicine, and land, and we can take it from them, be it by brute force or by some other more intelligent means.
I seriously think we need a rehash of the American and French revolutions where the entire head is cut off from the snake.
Start at those who hold their power structures up from the bottom, as they are readily accessible and already weakened there, then work your way up the hierarchy.
We can forge alliances across the spectrum of politics and religion and demographics, because everyone below the overclass claims to be against the overclass, time to force them all to live by their words.
By srtting it up as a revolution against a common enemy with whom everybody is discontent, we could make it into a simple matter like the people vs the rich and powerful.
That's what made occupy such a threat, you had White Christian national socialists and black atheist communists, and both were out there protesting the banks and Wall Street traders who ruined the economy.
Gather them all together, not just those who are completely like minded, but those who are like minded in that they claim to hate the same people you do.
Multipartian class warfare against the head of the serpent.
We keep it to a one issue movement, we want to take back the banks and remove the traders, as well as to replace the government, media, academia, and pretty much every institution of power and influence in our society.
It's a protest of the people who lack a place within institutional power, and those few who hold all the positions of power and influence in society.
[ + ] Version6
[ - ] Version6 -1 points 2 yearsMay 21, 2023 21:05:52 ago (+0/-1)