×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
25
21 comments block


[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 13:53:23 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 20:18:00 ago (+1/-0)

Preferred demographic

[ - ] fnbs 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 19:13:51 ago (+0/-0)

I wear 'racist' like a badge of honor, there is nothing wrong with being racist

[ - ] zr855 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 16:40:59 ago (+0/-0)*

The government doesn't create money. They borrow money from the jew federal reserve which, as much as they like to try to make it seem like part of the government, is a private bank owned by jews.

They control all the banks and require diversity and rainbow trucks to get their loans.

Use bitcoin and all this goes away.

Kike bots will respond and pretend that I'm the kike for telling you this. They know bitcoin is the only thing that will end their control over money creation. You will only die if you use money your enemy creates. If kikes want to create bitcoin, they have to mine and compete with everyone else and the total is 21 million units that can be divided infinitely anyway so there is only so much. It's like a small pie that you can cut into infinite slices. It's still a small pie and there is only so much. You don't get more pie by cutting smaller slices.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 20:56:45 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] zr855 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 21:39:32 ago (+0/-0)

It wouldn't matter. It's still far better than US dollars. Besides, it's more important that we USE it. Start using lightning. Get in and get out back to US dollars but we need to USE it.

Use Monero or any other crypto is FAR better than jew owned dollars.

[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 22, 2023 18:54:09 ago (+0/-0)

the most likely scenario is that satoshi's coins were thrown out at the start to provide ballast. i'd be more concerned about coins that have seen movement post-2012.

[ - ] Clubberlang -1 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 20:17:20 ago (+0/-1)

Hey cryptojew! How was the synagogue of satan rabbi?

[ - ] zr855 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 21:39:59 ago (+0/-0)

Kike bot. This bot owner HATES that the goyim know and the message about bitcoin is getting out.

[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 1 point 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 19:44:39 ago (+1/-0)

This whole "they are crashing the economy to implement CBDC" meme is utterly retarded. It's plainly obvious if you are perpetuating it that you don't understand a thing about currency, economy, or the world financial system.

Allow me to explain: First of all, each cash dollar you have ever held has a unique serial number. With that, it would be possible to implement every single "digital money" scam boomers are afraid of online. It's merely a manifestation of people not understanding technology. CBDC's are not necessary to control money the way people fear.

CBDC are real, but more or less already exist. The vast majority of money, including money you spend, is already digital. When you spend money on a credit card you aren't actually spending USD, but rather an equivalent digital currency owned by VISA or Mastercard, etc. This is complicated but if you can wrap your head around that idea you'll see that digital currency is more or less already in place.

There are several reasons countries want to implement CBDC - one is to clean up the processing - much of it is already digital as above and converting it all in that way has a lot of management upside. Next, payment processing is a huge industry. Each time you swipe a card someone somewhere is making $.25. This creates friction and point-of-payment costs among other things. By issuing a single CBDC, you can greatly simplify the process of moving payments around. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT JUST THIS ONE MOVE WILL SAVE 6% OF GDP. That is the primary reason they all want it - an instant savings on management costs (while also putting a bunch of companies out of business).

Finally, and most relevant to your government, CBDC is issued by the central bank which is not the case today. To "print money" the Fed Reserve or BOE or whatever issues securities and private banks operate them and that's how the money supply is controlled. By having a CBDC the Federal Reserve or BOE can issue the money directly into the accounts of the public. This gives them much greater control over the money supply, ie their ability to manage inflation and economic stimulus. If they can blast $500 stimulus cash into the accounts of the entire country within an hour of making the decision it makes a lot of economic tools possible. This is a big reason they want to do it - they cut out the banks from the moneh supply and also get to have much greater ability to target stimulus and spending.

Some potential features of CBDC you may have heard about are different "types" of money. One idea is that you can issue regular cash into someones wallet, which works like money in your bank account today. But you can also issue special money, like occurs with an HSA (Health Savings Account) where you can only spend it on a specific class of product (health care). I happen to think this is a cool feature that could be very beneficial for the public. Imagine we want to boost an economic sector for strategic reasons - the government can issue money to a certain group of people in a region, or everyone, or whatever, with the stipulation that it can only be spent on that product/service/whatever. Think of it as like issuing a flexible type of gift card next to regular cash/money.

Third and one that spooks people is the idea of issue additional "time-limited" stimulus. This would be in a case where you want people to go out and spend on consumer goods for whatever reason. By issuing the stimulus immediately and setting a time limit you ensure that money circulates in the economy rather than being stuffed into the proverbial mattress, used to pay off debt, etc. All of these are nice tools that we don't have without CBDC.

CBDC's are already in live testing and working in certain countries. We know how they'll work and/or can work. The main thing you learn quickly when studying this in other countries is that the governments barely give a shit about the things internet boomers are afraid of. These are minor afterthoughts to them, because this is mostly about making it efficient to move large dollar amounts between banks, handling international transfers, and issuing stimulus efficiently. Things like "offline wallets" are simple and not even remotely a problem for the government.

Offline money: You have your digital wallet on your phone that has your regular CBDC dollars, plus maybe a few types of above mentioned money. You also have an "offline" cash wallet. You just transfer from your cbdc to your offline wallet and the transaction is noted as basically the same as you taking cash out of an ATM. It removes that money from your CBDC ledger so you can't spend it that way, but now you have the "cash" bits on your phone and can spend them locally. All the government can see is that you took money "offline" into cash and that eventually it turned up in someone else's account when it was deposited as CBDC. The numbers/tracking are there to ensure it exists, as if when you take cash out of the ATM it notes the serial numbers and then when someone desposits cash in an ATM it checks the serial numbers again, verifying it's real and not counterfeit.

They do have the potential to track how money circulates a bit more easily, but again they can do that today (and do that today) by scanning serial numbers. Banks take in cash and submit it to regional banks for destruction regularly and they use some of this data for that purpose. The reality is the government doesn't particularly give a shit what you do with your "offline cash." In theory they could track it from wallet to wallet if set up that way but that's extremely easy to manipulate. The main benefit for them isn't to stop gray market transactions because it doesn't, it's to stop COUNTERFEIT dollars which are quietly an enormous problem.

CBDC is above all about controlling the money supply and making the transfer of money quicker and cheaper and easier to keep track of for data purposes.

Can they in theory ban you from spending money from a CBDC wallet? Of course. The same way they can lock out your bank account debit card today. The same forces that prevent that from being done (or fail to) will still exist in the context of CBDC.

In practice, nothing changes much from your end.

tl;dr: the government actually doesn't care what or who spend money on that much and CBDC is about giving them a bunch of other things which are irrelevant to you but very valuable to them for managing the currency and economy.

[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 20:16:33 ago (+1/-0)

Is this book available on Amazon?

[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 22, 2023 18:51:03 ago (+0/-0)

sorry about your attention spam bro

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 22, 2023 21:00:29 ago (+0/-0)

Spam een eggz nigga wut?!

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 20:53:20 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 22, 2023 18:52:36 ago (+0/-0)

they destory supply all of the time right now. my entire point is basically that almost nothing fearmongers say about 'CBDC' is dependent upon them having an actual CBDC.

as for quantum computer, yes, it can crack existing encryption, but we already have encryption methods that it can't crack and when the time comes things will just switch over. it's not a big deal.

bitcoin has never been counterfeited in 13 years.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 21:46:24 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] zr855 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 21:46:40 ago (+0/-0)*

The (((federal reserve))) doesn't issue securities. The Treasury, which is part of the government, issues securities(bonds). The fed buys those bonds from the Treasury (really commercial banks buy them and the fed buys them from the banks) and gives the Treasury digital US jew dollars in return.

The federal reserve is owned by jews. They control all the banks in the us and now require ford to paint their car faggy to get loans. Only banks create us dollars.

CBDCs are mostly being considered because the US doesn't want people to start using the Chinese cbdc. If people start using that over the US cbdc, the dollar loses dominance.

private banks operate them and that's how the money supply is controlled.

The federal reserve controls the operating parameters of commercial banks and "sets" the federal funds rate. That's the primary way the money supply is controlled by the federal reserve. When they want to grow the money supply they lower the federal funds rate and when they want to slow the growth of the money supply, they increase the federal funds rate. They used to set the fractional reserve limit to accomplish this as well but as of 2020 there is no longer a reserve requirement at banks. The federal reserve eliminated that. All commercial banks create US dollars when they loan money. The money is literally created right then. They don't have to have money to loan money.

The federal funds rate isn't set directly.

The Federal Reserve uses several tools to regulate the supply of US dollars in the economy. This influence is not done directly but rather through its influence on credit conditions, interest rates, and financial markets.

Here are a few methods:

1. Open Market Operations (OMO): This is the primary tool the Fed uses. By buying or selling U.S. Treasury securities, the Federal Reserve influences the federal funds rate, which is the interest rate at which depository institutions lend reserve balances to other depository institutions overnight.

- If the Fed wants to decrease the money supply, it sells Treasury securities. This process absorbs cash from the market as banks pay for these securities, reducing the amount of money in circulation.

- If the Fed wants to increase the money supply, it buys Treasury securities. The payment for these securities increases the amount of reserve balances in the banking system, providing banks with more money to lend out.

2. Discount Rate: This is the interest rate charged by Federal Reserve Banks to depository institutions on short-term loans. Lowering the discount rate can encourage banks to borrow more from the Federal Reserve, increasing the amount of money in circulation. Conversely, raising the discount rate makes borrowing from the Federal Reserve more expensive, which can decrease the money supply.

3. Interest on Reserves (IOR): The Federal Reserve pays interest on the reserves that depository institutions hold in their accounts at the Fed. This policy was implemented during the financial crisis in 2008. If the Fed wants to discourage lending and reduce the money supply, it can increase the interest rate paid on reserves, which incentivizes banks to hold more money in reserve instead of lending it out. If the Fed wants to encourage lending and increase the money supply, it can lower the interest rate paid on reserves.

4. Reserve Requirements: Prior to 2020, the Fed required banks to hold a certain amount of their deposits in reserve, ensuring that they had enough cash on hand to meet customer withdrawals. However, the Fed eliminated reserve requirements in March 2020, supposedly in response to the economic instability caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Even without the reserve requirements, the Fed retains its ability to influence the money supply through the aforementioned mechanisms. These operations are supposedly conducted in response to evolving economic conditions with the ultimate goal of achieving and maintaining a stable economy. The preferred outcomes are low inflation and low unemployment.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 20:10:01 ago (+0/-1)

deleted

[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 2.0 yearsMay 21, 2023 20:15:39 ago (+2/-0)

Deep State: We are your democracy.

We're a republic not a democracy

From time to time the tree of liberty needs watered from the blood of tyrants, such is its manure.

[ - ] _Obrez 1 point 2.0 yearsMay 22, 2023 01:38:23 ago (+1/-0)

The only fix is a radical budgeting.

If we took a non racial approach to radical budgeting we'd have spend more on it than otherwise and we'd lose the advantage of spontaneous tribalist enforcement.

Niggers cost the treasure about a million bucks over their lifetime on average, spics cost half that over their lifetimes on average but there's more than twice as many spics. Niggers cost us 42 trillion, spics probably 50 trillion including illegals, and id bet money cultural contamination from niggers is making our whites less productive while all the diversity crap is taking good paying jobs from people who could advance and earn more in the long run.

You aren't killing 150 and some odd million spics and nogs, don't kid yourselves.

If we intend to purge we also should consider economy, we will be denounced internationally and our trade will collapse not to mention the bounties we'd need to offer and the cost of disposal.

The simple and clean solutions are the best for preserving white lives, livelihoods and our national wealthy.

Put 11 to 14 trillion into a neogarveyist "reparations" package and sell it as an end to black captivity in the west. They get hundred of thousands per head and a boat ride back to africa, lose american citizenship and all claims thereto but gain citizenahip in their host nation, africa is getting a 13 trillion buck investment and there will be a middle class in africa, at least that's the sales pitch, we know it'll end in cannibalism in about 12 years we push all the nigs to leave over a decade, infinigger tax is gone, inflation collapse by a third.

Political math grossly favors reverse migration with dems disarmed a voter block and repubs no longer can shop around for nigger votes they'll need to lean white, we push the illegals out ASAP before we slip into minority and the parties turn their backs on us. That solves about 12 trillion were looking at saving nearly a trillion a year we don't need to print and can start paying down debt, we then make whites an enshrined priority in america.

4 steps from here. locking the borders to nonwhites, encouraging white births through sensible subsidy, encouraging non white passing migrants remigrate home, and improving education.

You can fly in or get a transit or work pass but overstay is a felony barring you from legal reentry, foreigners accruing a second felony are executed. We will have checkpoints for browns to show papers.

If you can prove your white heritage you get options for 0% interest loans at marriage and births and each child takes 25% off your loans, copying what poland does. This is a bet our education reforms will produce superior results to the current generation. White passing can be done in two stages, fair skin and either light hair or colorful irises will qualify you, you can get a bit more on the loans or more potential loans if you meet all 3 between the spouses, a second grade of loans is attainable if you meet the base requirement of fair skin and go for in person testing for IQ phrenology, genealogy and aesthetics, if you are fair of skin but dark of eye and hair you may get a passing grade in these tests. Divorce breaks the loan conditions and encurs a penalty and new interest on unpaid moneys.

We claim non whites are in america due to past eugenic ideology of imperialist gpobalism and that it has robbed unique peoples of their brain trust and harmed native genepools the world over, we must see this repaired an ask peoples to return to their homelands in the third and second world to rebuild them. A positive propaganda with a liberal progressive spin. We'll offer job training and certification courses to people leaving if they need it.

Mt education reforms are a wallpost on their own so I'll be brief.

Segregate sexes at grade 4 or 5, authority to discipline restored, new building every 3 grades, raise teaching salaries, higher expectations on decorum and maturity each building, serious education not babysitting, mostly short book reports, value debate and primary sources, copy club system from japan, sumer break cut in half and needed days go to winter. Learning should be easy and practical. No dropping out at 16 you either finish between 20 and 22 or drop out at 18 and do 3 years compulsory military service. The finishing portion after grade 12 is like college without the fluff of liberal arts instead you get 2 work study tracks you pick so by 21 you have 3 years of real experience and your work studies must pay you, they get tax benefits for participation. Surgeons and the like go to a post compulsory education school and work study.

The idea of my education reforms is to produce a young person with practical skills and education in 2 fields so they can sooner start their own families in financial security. Women will be encouraged to take the homemaker track as often as possible and they will get more than sewing and cooking, were gonna make professional high end home makers who can make money and value from home.

[ - ] prototype [op] 1 point 2.0 yearsMay 22, 2023 13:14:07 ago (+1/-0)

You've thought it out well enough. If I didn't have shit to do I'd debate some of the finer points.

Eh, you can be the minister of education. Congratulations.

[ - ] rhy 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 22, 2023 04:16:34 ago (+0/-0)

This is the solution:

OpenAirShips.com

Fuck all governments and all corporations.