☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
2

My predictions haven't been as wrong as some want you to believe.

submitted by prototype to random 2 yearsMay 28, 2023 19:25:43 ago (+4/-2)     (random)

My predictions and what came true:
https://pic8.co/sh/WnGqVh.png
https://pic8.co/sh/O63qNY.png
predicted here about halfway down:
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=646bb7e392413


You don't back an enemy into a corner unless you intend to provoke them, just as is happening with the taliban in iran.

I predicted this..
https://pic8.co/sh/EwtIBz.png
And then this happened..
https://pic8.co/sh/vtvwZ6.png

This is markedly different from before, where they only hinted at 'consequences'. This is them declaring an actual redline. An "if X then Y" statement.
predicted here:
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=64624553abd2c



this event...
https://pic8.co/sh/C49lm9.png
predicated upon this event...
https://pic8.co/sh/J9oxsO.png
which you can see fleshed out in full here...
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=646bb7e392413

explains why I predicted this...
https://pic8.co/sh/O63qNY.png
..and why this is happening right now...
https://pic8.co/sh/WnGqVh.png


Likewise I predicted this..
https://pic8.co/sh/pMiHbT.png

Then it started happening...
https://pic8.co/sh/MBox19.png


I posted this:
https://pic8.co/sh/7cUZVJ.png
and then...
https://pic8.co/sh/ZjVlB9.png

This last one wasn't even a prediction, it was vague details
given to me in a discord chat by someone claiming to work at the
DOJ. We were discussing corruption and the capture of the agency
by the left and he mentioned they were getting ready to let
go a bunch of people they considered rightwing. I asked him how
he knew this and he gave me a bs answer and I called him on it.
He capitulated and said he "may or may not work for the DOJ."
I told him I knew he was a glowie since we first talked (lol).
He said the whole agency is being purged of anyone remotely left
of mao. I didn't believe him so he said to watch and wait,
that someone in congress or the senate was about to go down
hard, and that the DOJ had been listening to their attorney's
phone calls for months and had accidentally picked up conversations
talking about both blackmail (prostitution) and bribery involving
dozens of senators and congressmen through ally embassies.
That this would be coming out this year or january of next, and it would be all over the
online news when it does. I asked him to be more specific and he refused multiple times
because he was afraid of what would happen.

I don't know if the menendez scandal is it, or if the santos scandal is,
or if he was refering to someone else, but it is interesting to see.




For the doom predictions (nuclear/biological/chemicals attacks, etc)
I think I now understand what may be going on. The reason this keeps happening,
xyz happens in the news, and many in the alt-sphere predict some catastrophe,
is because there may be an intentional "fog of war" being spread.
The signals are mixed, but what it looks like in hindsight is intelligence
agencies manufacturing incidents that lead the non-mainstream element of
public opinion to misread potential events and the details thereof.
Some explanations for this would be
1. It may be a discrediting operation for the larger alt-news sphere,
The "alex jones" treatment but for all non-mainstream news and discussions.

2. It could be so elements of intel and the military can keep their options open
to allow or carry out major events/catastrophes, however rare.

3. Distract from actual major disasters, by using multiple ongoing crisises
that start with a shock, follow on widespread predictions, and then those
predictions being incorrect. This would suggest the major false flags we are
looking for already happened, and the rumors would be encouraged intentionally,
till it is reflexive, in order to deflect from questioning the original events.
This model would help explain the post-covid never-ending series of crises.
The covid lockdowns were the next "9/11". This also suggests a duty-cycle for
these large scale nation-level events, of 15-20 years.


Whichever the case may be, there appears to be a concerted effort in the background,
to intentionally obfuscate the public's ability to know what happens next, and to
shape our beliefs about what can happen, what won't happen, and what will happen.

In the intervening time it is critical to become better at judging information,
parsing the intentions behind it, and determining both its origin, and its accuracy.

I'd also like to thank u/chrimony, without whose criticism, this post would not have happened.


13 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2 yearsMay 28, 2023 19:31:59 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] prototype [op] 2 points 2 yearsMay 28, 2023 19:47:31 ago (+2/-0)

It also suggests the possibility that netanyahu's government is actually sabotaging israel in favor of saudi arabia and eventual population outflows from israel to ukraine.

If the u.s. is "too busy fighting a war with china" then naturally we wouldn't be able to come assist israel in any conflict, or we might even drop support at a critical time for them, thus 'losing' them any developing conflict in the middle east.

Would explain why the zionists in the u.s. government were so vehemently foaming at the mouth against trump who was in bed with netanyahu, and why they fought so hard to put biden in instead.

Straussians vs zionists seems like an interesting potential perspective of the ongoing conflicts both at home in the u.s. and abroad.

[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 1 point 2 yearsMay 29, 2023 00:00:16 ago (+1/-0)

You're half right.

Zionism is racism. Plain and simple.

Without war, you can't subjugate the existing population. All of Ukraine's military aged men are going to be forced to die as cannon fodder, so that the women and children can be enslaved and sold. People are valuable commodities when they're defenseless, right?

Fucking jews. So many criminals; it makes me regret they can only be tried and executed once.

[ - ] drstrangegub 0 points 2 yearsMay 28, 2023 21:08:38 ago (+0/-0)

this is a highly intelligent community. we've all been right about a lot of stuff. but the problem is this is an internet ghetto. get out there and talk to people irl. it will cost you your friends, family, and well being. but there is no other way.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2 yearsMay 28, 2023 23:29:51 ago (+0/-0)

What you do: Draw up big speculations. Pepper them smaller ideas. Something tangentially happens that is close to one of those small ideas. You claim this as a successful prediction.

So the Taliban had a clash with Iran in 2023. Did you know they also had a clash with them in 2021? Does that mean the US intentionally left weapons behind to be taken over by the Taliban? No. Does that mean all the grand speculations surrounding this "successful" prediction are true? No.

Where's the nuke on a US city that was supposed to start a war with Russia? Oh, didn't happen. But there was a drone strike in Iran, and you mentioned that the US would attack Iran or Turkey to draw Russia in a multifront war, so now this is a "successful" prediction.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2 yearsMay 29, 2023 00:24:53 ago (+0/-0)*

What you do: Draw up big speculations

Nope. Speculation is usually without evidence.

Pepper them smaller ideas.

The prediction russia would invade ukraine, two weeks before it happened, was a small prediction?
That india would violate sanctions is a small prediction?

Something tangentially happens

It's multiple predictions. And I've already said multiple times not every prediction is contingent necessary on any other.

So the Taliban had a clash with Iran in 2023.

"wahhh, oy vey, he got one right! Lets dismiss it out of hand."

I met you half way and yet you insist on acting like an insufferable obnoxious cunt.
You should quit your bullshit and fuck off my thread.

Does that mean the US intentionally left weapons behind to be taken over by the Taliban? No.

Wheres you proof? You're just speculating they're not connector. Oh right you have none. See, I'm just holding you to your own standard.

Where's the nuke on a US city that was supposed to start a war with Russia? Oh, didn't happen.

apparently you have the memory of a goldfish because you just got done saying this and I acknowledged I was wrong.
Maybe stop huffing paint.

But there was a drone strike in Iran, and you mentioned that the US would attack Iran or Turkey to draw Russia in a multifront war

Legit got it correct on that, and you act like I didn't. Anyone reading can see you're intent on willfully ignoring facts while hyperfocusing on one example.

Try being less autistic.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2 yearsMay 29, 2023 11:09:49 ago (+0/-0)

Nope. Speculation is usually without evidence.

You can draw up wild conclusions based on little evidence.

The prediction russia would invade ukraine, two weeks before it happened, was a small prediction?

Given that the US had been publicly warning exactly this would happen, yes.

You should quit your bullshit and fuck off my thread.

As soon as quit your bullshit and fuck off the forum. Since you're not going to do that, I'll continue to criticize as I please.

[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2 yearsMay 31, 2023 19:08:36 ago (+0/-0)

Given that the US had been publicly warning exactly this would happen, yes.

oh you mean the same u.s. that had dozens of experts explicitly saying russia wouldn't invade, or the fantasy version of the u.s. in your head?

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2 yearsMay 31, 2023 19:25:25 ago (+0/-0)

oh you mean the same u.s. that had dozens of experts explicitly saying russia wouldn't invade, or the fantasy version of the u.s. in your head?

I don't know what planet you're living on:

November 2021:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-ukraine-invasion-us-eu-b1956158.html

"US ‘warns Europe that Russia could invade Ukraine’, as troops mass near border"

But you're the "chatter" guy. Maybe you're listening to mice.

[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2 yearsJun 1, 2023 01:08:51 ago (+0/-0)

The CIA's public position two weeks before the invasion:
Putin wouldn't dare.

Was all over the news.

I don't give a fuck what the u.k. news claims the u.s. said.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2 yearsJun 1, 2023 03:07:01 ago (+0/-0)

The CIA's public position two weeks before the invasion:
Putin wouldn't dare.

No reference for your claim.

I don't give a fuck what the u.k. news claims the u.s. said.

That's just the first link I picked, retard. Of course there's plenty more, because this was all over the news:

November 10, 2021

"Blinken says US is concerned Russia may be ‘attempting to rehash’ 2014 invasion of Ukraine "
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/10/politics/blinken-ukrainian-presser/index.html

February 11, 2022

"U.S. warns threat of Russian invasion of Ukraine is "immediate""
https://www.axios.com/2022/02/11/russian-invasion-ukraine-jake-sullivan

And Russia invaded on February 24.

[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 1 point 2 yearsMay 28, 2023 23:43:58 ago (+1/-0)

Want some real insight into the game behind the game?

The head of the snake is the Khazarian mafia. They view the land around Ukraine as the original land belonging to the central banking empire. They will go through any length to sabotage the land and steal it. Including engineering WW3. It's already starting to sort out the sides.

Recently, the Simpsons (I don't watch it anymore but there's hidden messages in the show) dropped an un-subtle line at Krusty's bar mitzvah (whatever the fuck those jewish parties are called). He mentioned how India was going to nuke Pakistan.

A few weeks ago, the head of Pakistan's leadership Imran was arrested by paramilitary forces during transport. The reason: he was very Trump-like in his decisions. He wanted to side with Russia. India also wanted to side with Russia. If Pakistan and India side with Russia, they would become proxy allies and wouldn't have any reason to oppose supply transports through the regions. It would put the US at a massive disadvantage. The US needs a puppet in Pakistan who would follow the US and side against Russia.

Some similar events to the above are going to happen near China (forget about Taiwan, that's not important) and near Korea. South Korea might end up crazier than the North. They're already getting dystopian out there.

The rules for war are as simple as Sun Tzu spelled out: who has the moral authority? Which general fights for a purpose and for a conviction? The Russians are fighting for a moral reason: the safety of their own citizens being destroyed by Ukrainian leaders corrupting every aspect of the former country. Russia is winning. They're better at producing ammunition and weapons than the EU nations + America. America has offshored nearly all of the vital war manufacturing, and it's going to cost dearly. When Trump comes along and demands MANUFACTURING, a solution, to all the upcoming problems, he gets impeached.

There is no war on "nations," there's a war on nations with popularly elected leaders. Popularly elected leaders tend not to follow the central banksters abominable requests to subjugate the mass populations. Pakistan's Imran, Mexico's Obrador, America's Trump . . . etc. Remember Bolsonaro? Keep telling the truth too much and you might find out that it's never an enemy that you have to fight; it's your own nation that calls you an enemy for correctly pointing out that you're going to war with an enemy that didn't exist until you forced them into that position.

[ - ] Sleazy 3 points 2 yearsMay 28, 2023 19:44:01 ago (+3/-0)

the bombs did not fall

[ - ] prototype [op] 1 point 2 yearsMay 28, 2023 19:48:08 ago (+1/-0)

the bombs did not fall

That is correct. DULY noted. Thank you for your service.