×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
31
17 comments block


[ - ] con77 9 points 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 12:52:28 ago (+9/-0)

that judge needs rope

[ - ] TheNoticing 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 12:57:07 ago (+1/-0)

"judge" in quotation marks, because it is my belief that they are British nobility.

[ - ] deleted 5 points 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 13:40:14 ago (+5/-0)*

deleted

[ - ] TheYiddler -1 points 1.9 yearsJun 22, 2023 06:25:53 ago (+0/-1)

You just violated your own principle. Advocating for communism is free speech too, or it will be redefined to outlaw any speech. Communism can't survive with free speech because it is easily refuted. That is why communists love censorship.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 22, 2023 12:15:21 ago (+1/-0)*

deleted

[ - ] TheYiddler -1 points 1.9 yearsJun 23, 2023 07:19:10 ago (+0/-1)

That too is what commies do. They retaliate against speech. They don't call it censorship, they call it "consequences". Hanging a nigger for being a nigger is different from hanging a commie for advocating for bullshit.

You are right about the legal system though. If it wasn't kiked, fag teachers would be fired in short order.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 23, 2023 09:45:49 ago (+1/-0)*

deleted

[ - ] SocksOnCats 3 points 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 13:24:42 ago (+3/-0)

So, while a technicality, I think this decision only stands within the dress code of the school. I don't think it applies in general - although I'm sure it will be pushed for that.

[ - ] Leveraction 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 13:47:38 ago (+1/-0)

Ha,ha ha "dress code"? Really? There hasn't been dress codes for years

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 18:48:27 ago (+0/-0)

My understanding was that schools had wide latitude to implement dress codes. If they had simply required uniforms, they'd be fine. The problem here is that they want to specifically ban a political view. As long as they ban the opposite political view, they're also fine in arguing that the shirts cause a disruption. Whether the shirts do or whatever is kind of irrelevant, since administrators are empowered to make that decision.

[ - ] JudyStroyer 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 15:59:29 ago (+1/-0)

It translates directly to "I am an outright enemy and traitor, and I deserve to be killed. Get my family too." If I remember correctly.

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 15:14:09 ago (+1/-0)

My guess would be the faggot law in massachusetts says this. I wouldn't expect a district judge to immediately overrule state law on account of the Constitution. It's generally above their pay grade. If this gets decided in favor of the Constitution, it will be on appeal.

[ - ] Leveraction 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 13:49:55 ago (+1/-0)

Unless the pedophile judge can prove "there are only two genders" is the same as yelling "fire' in movie theater, then yes it is protected speech.

[ - ] KingsPawn 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 13:25:10 ago (+1/-0)*

"There Are Only Two Genders ♂ ♀"

It would be epic if all decent students wore this shirt every Monday.

"Holocaust Is Fiction... Palestine Is The True Field Of Extermination"

It would be great every Tuesday.

"Leave Your Money Away From The Jewish Banks".

It would be cool every Wednesday.

"It Is Time: For Blacks To Break Free (and go back to the mother Africa)".

It would beautiful every Thursday.

"Love your race: Never mix".

Every Friday.


Let's get implode the immoral corrupt Judicial System by flooding it with processes as much as they could never judge in 2000 years...


[ - ] boekanier 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 22, 2023 00:29:35 ago (+0/-0)

yeah, a 'judge' or is it (((judge)))?

[ - ] GayPatriot1969 -3 points 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 15:36:14 ago (+0/-3)

Hate did not win that day ❤️🏳️‍🌈

[ - ] JudyStroyer 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 21, 2023 16:01:49 ago (+1/-0)

Shut the fuck up, faggot nigger.