☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
43

I was hoping something would have been done about Joe McCarthy by now -- yesterday he outed himself as JIDF

submitted by Lost_In_The_Thinking to whatever 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 11:17:49 ago (+47/-4)     (whatever)

The evidence is very credible. He posted a link on ConPro that can only be read with a subscription, which is only given to select people, namely "MEMBERS OF GOVERNMENT, LAW ENFORCEMENT, MEDIA, AND ACADEMIA".

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=64ac92d42d047

This was discussed yesterday in great length here in a post by @FreeinTx:

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=64aca0e9784f5

This morning I see Joe doubled down and has been busier than ever trying to put time and distance from that post and make it more difficult for people call him out. Almost like there were a few different people posting on the account at the same time!

@system, please get rid of this pest. He is universally reviled on Voat.


147 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] system 23 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:41:22 ago (+24/-1)

He hasn't broken any site rules to my knowledge. People who are wrong or delusional are still entitled to free speech on this website. Censorship is one of the top issues facing the world and is the sole reason for this site's existence.

Accounts with negative scp/ccp are limited in various ways but to prevent a complete echo chamber they are allowed to make text posts.

[ - ] observation1 10 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 18:41:12 ago (+10/-0)

He's broken rule 1: No posting of illegal content.
When he discussed his illegal affair with a 13 year old.

He's broken rule 3. No spamming, which is open to interpretation.

Hes broken rule 6. Any content which contains nudity and/or is sexually explicit must be labeled "Adult".

Which he has done several times just in the last week, no interpretation needed.

[ - ] SecretHitler 9 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:02:55 ago (+9/-0)

Here's a direct quote from joe:

We should discuss how you boys are going to stop me from going full bin Laden. I have openly told you what I'm going to do to you. How about a drone strike in an American neighborhood?

https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=6494f38b620d4&commentid=649a006a9c411

I appreciate the freedom here but saying he's planning a drone strike in an American neighborhood for purposes of terrorism is the kind of thing that would get us in the news and shut down and as I understand it does break site rules.

[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:40:21 ago (+5/-0)

Yep. Baiting and honeypotting.

[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 20:56:21 ago (+3/-1)

That's assuming the 13 year old can get his parents to buy him a drone.

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 22:34:46 ago (+2/-0)

LMAO 😂

[ - ] Spaceman84 -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 22:50:50 ago (+1/-2)

Joe has been with us since 2016 I think. Back on old voat he reminded me that my account was older than his. Was he SIEGE posting at age 7?

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 23:03:29 ago (+0/-3)*

February 2016. Night of the Nevada GOP presidential caucus. Is when I joined.

Things went pretty well for a couple of years. Then I started posting about Atomwaffen in about February of 2018. Then the downvotes. But I'm told I only get downvoted because I started posting porn without a NSFW tag on Christmas of 2019.

Full court press to have me banned right now. Feds are terrified. This isn't going to help them much though.

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 23:11:54 ago (+1/-1)

I wish you'd give up the porn posting. I guess it must be an oppositional defiant disorder compulsion. There are plenty of venues that would welcome your pornographic historianism. Atomwaffen turned out to be infested with glowies though, didn't it?

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 23:16:29 ago (+0/-3)*

I don't think Atomwaffen was ever fundamentally a fed op. It got infiltrated though.

But beyond all of the history there - which I've been over a lot on this forum in recent months - it was the promotion of a terrorist organization, even if with no concrete purpose in mind, that really started to attract the heat and visibility suppression. For obvious reasons. Harland and Kattie both told me to keep Atomwaffen out of OE. I've ultimately lost Kattie in all this jazz. Another reason for me to be pissed off.

Why do you object to naked women? I think they're nice.

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 23:19:42 ago (+1/-1)

What's your assessment on The Base? They were in the news cycle for a minute.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 23:26:26 ago (+0/-3)

Pretty much decimated by FBI arrests and Rinaldo Nazzaro has struggled to rebuild. He's clearly Atomwaffen inspired but is far better formally trained as a contractor in insurgency stuff. People fear he's an informant because he used to do work for DHS and such.

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 23:25:20 ago (+1/-1)

Regarding porn, especially softcore, I don't have any issue with it. However it does absolutely hobble your ability to get your message out. You're giving faggots an avenue to attack you on moral grounds rather than address the content of your political posts. As much as I hate it optics do matter and you've given your opponents an angle to attack. You seem to like it and deliberately provoke them with it.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 23:36:40 ago (+0/-3)

I think the naked women is far more of a weapon for me than a liability. The enemy will use anything as an attack vector. It also distinguishes me and gets lots of attention. That sorta forces them to attack it as a counter.

I could say much more here. But I don't want to touch on spook shit at any length.

[ - ] RexYehudi -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 19:13:35 ago (+3/-4)*

"Bin Laden" nuthin'..

https://i.postimg.cc/d33RLmhH/WTC-2nd-plane.jpg

There were no hijackers the planes that struck the WTC Towers were piloted by remote control, using hardware developed by Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who with Zionists Jerome Hauer and Michael Chertoff engineered the whole project.

Guided Missile at the WTC.
Cruise Missile at the Pentagon on 911.

As well we know that Israel rocketed the US Sept. 11, 2001 and blamed mad Arabs, this is just more of the same.

"Whoever owing allegiance to the United States levies war against them or adheres to their enemies giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death." 18 USC Ch. 115, §2381.

The US should have replied to Israel in kind as soon it became obvious they were the attackers and that the Moslem hijacker's story was pure fiction, that the entire US political, law enforcement and news dissemination apparatus turns from the evidence, means the whole lot should suffer arrest, trial and execution all under the auspices of existing US Law.

Osama bin Laden Denies Guilt For the 911 Attacks.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -11 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:36:29 ago (+0/-11)

That wasn't me saying I was planning a drone strike. That was suggesting you boys equate me to an Islamic terrorist so you might drone me.

I appreciate these new and innovative ways to get me banned though. Keep at it. We can always take this to busier platforms...

[ - ] Steelerfish 4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 17:07:35 ago (+4/-0)

I’m sure “We” as you say have a presence in those busier platforms as well- as per the charter y’all are bound to.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 17:40:36 ago (+0/-5)

By now this is a very predictable process. I go to a platform. Feds disrupt. We can do this on a couple of dozen more platforms. I don't care. I get banned. They still lose.

[ - ] SecretHitler 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 21:22:04 ago (+3/-0)

From the sound of it you still lose. A lot.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 21:36:03 ago (+0/-4)

I get banned from a few platforms I can join again later. "As Tommasi said, FORGET such activities as might be used in a campaign to gain political power. Rather, go instead to activities designed and intended to HURT THE ENEMY." - James Mason, SIEGE.

I'm sure most can put two and two together here.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 20:56:28 ago (+1/-0)

I go to a platform. Feds disrupt.

Yeah. That's the point, officer.

[ - ] Rotteuxx 7 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:46:36 ago (+10/-3)

It's just the latest forum disruption technique being rolled out this week.

[ - ] MuricaPersonified 10 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:27:02 ago (+10/-0)

If you ignore him, he's not so disruptive. Tag the shills with a neg and don't engage. Block if you feel you must.

[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:39:00 ago (+2/-1)

I love blocking. I’n not entertaining trolls and dickriders. I have at least 8-9 shitheads blocked and it is liberating amd makes for a more enjoyable board experience. Highly recommend.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 6 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 19:25:50 ago (+6/-0)

I’n not entertaining trolls and dickriders

This is rich coming from MR. NIGGER ALL-CAPS

[ - ] Clubberlang 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 20:53:09 ago (+3/-0)

Then your cutting out opposing views and only listening to those you agree with.

Mine as well go back to MS soeshul meejyah.

[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 04:54:11 ago (+1/-0)

Yeah, the people I’m blocking aren’t exactly Tim Russert—they’re fucking annoying faggots who stalk me from thread to thread. They probably resent me because they know I’ll never let them mouthnurse my manmeat. Oh yeah, and Helena.

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 13, 2023 22:48:12 ago (+0/-0)

mouthnurse my manmeat.

👍

[ - ] paul_neri -2 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 02:56:30 ago (+0/-2)

Disappointed in you BigGuy...I tort you wuz a beeg gy!

[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 20:51:44 ago (+2/-0)

Usually it's 👃 derailment of main topics with them getting into a baiting name calling contest with someone you'd normally wouldn't think would take the bait.

[ - ] MaimNazis -16 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:12:21 ago (+1/-17)

"Forum disruption" is a myth used by paranoid right-wingers. Trust me, no one cares about your little right-wing shithole.

[ - ] HeyJames 7 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:59:26 ago (+7/-0)

Ok blumen

[ - ] Sector7 4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:34:48 ago (+4/-0)

You believe you're a "no one"? I do too.

[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:39:27 ago (+3/-0)

Then why are you here?

[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 20:54:07 ago (+2/-0)

Point and case.

[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 01:45:45 ago (+1/-0)

Desperately caring about something while declaring at the same time that nobody cares about it, is a soy brain left wing territory.

You’re not capable of shame so let’s hear you declare your entitlement.

[ - ] WanderingToast 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 04:19:54 ago (+1/-0)

And yet here you are...

Voat isn't right wing, it's just free speech. But that's often a problem for people whose ideology requires the suspension of a critical and honest perception of the world and reality in general.

Feel free to go hang out with the pro-vax, WEF are kangs, omg current billionaire is so cool, minor attracted person is the preferred term, automod has deleted your post because you used a hateful emoji, shadow banning, it's our think or no voice, friends of Epstein

Idiot

[ - ] Rotteuxx 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:15:32 ago (+3/-3)

Ouch, dat edge!!!

[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:35:07 ago (+5/-0)

Censorship is good thing. jews and commies should be censored from life.

[ - ] TheBigMan 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:39:06 ago (+4/-1)

Plus people can block his glow nigger ass.

[ - ] GloryBeckons 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:16:20 ago (+4/-1)*

I agree completely with you on allowing free speech, even and especially when it runs counter to popular opinion.

What I don't and never will understand is why you don't consider spamming porn on this site a breach of the rules.

Porn is not speech. And neither is spam. Both are a disruption of speech. Often intentional. On a site like this, obviously intentional. Your refusal to act on this harms your stated purpose.

Joe has a long history of relentlessly spamming porn, and recently stated he intends to continue doing so and slowly posting his entire collection.

[ - ] White_Pride_Cis 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 19:18:54 ago (+3/-0)

That being said, he’s still a sucker of baby dicks.

[ - ] PhantomXLII 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 20:48:30 ago (+3/-0)

He hasn't broken any site rules

He's a fucking jew and that's a global ban. So what the fuck?

Censorship is one of the top issues facing the world

Virtue signalling cuckery.

and is the sole reason for this site's existence

Then it shouldn't have.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -4 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 03:35:04 ago (+0/-4)*

Never paid you much mind other than to note you just seem to fit the socially ill adjusted, insecure incel type - but this cartoonish performance here has me looking at your presence on this list a mite more closely.

https://searchvoat.co/v/OccidentalEnclave/3587921

When Space called this place a fed circle jerk he nailed it. I'll put it on the tombstone when this place closes. What a disgrace.

[ - ] PhantomXLII 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 10:06:28 ago (+2/-0)

Never paid you much mind other than to note you just seem to fit the socially ill adjusted, insecure incel type

K

Why would anyone of a correct persuasion ever be well adjusted to this society your kind has created?

And incel? Lol you fucking kike. Keep using the buzzwords. Let's call it "volcel" though. 90% of "women" are promiscuous filth who have betrayed a very basic rule God himself set forth. Then there's the fact that 60% of marriages end in divorce, prenups get thrown out all the time, and...

Yeah, no, I really can't see the point to any of it. Hell, maybe I'm missing something. I've never been in a relationship myself so maybe it's just that good, damn the facts.

But if all of it is that good, I'm better off not knowing. Can't miss what you never had.

So thanks, jew. Thank you for your part in ruining women, society in general honestly, and helping me ensure I'm at least a better man before your pets kill me. Maybe not a good man, but certainly better.

[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 20:50:33 ago (+1/-0)

to prevent a complete echo chamber they are allowed to make text posts.

Explained this red pill to someone today. I think I made a dent.

[ - ] beece 14 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:10:08 ago (+14/-0)

Right now OP, you know who and what it is. If you ban them, they will re-up and be newfags that people are not familiar with. Which do you prefer? Knowing or not knowing?

[ - ] SumerBreeze 4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:26:19 ago (+4/-0)

Assuming he hasn’t already made several accounts and uses them interchangeably.

[ - ] TheSimulacra 5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:48:32 ago (+6/-1)

WHY OP needs someone else to do something about it when there is a BLOCK button is beyond my understanding.
I forgot this kike even existed until a day ago.

[ - ] MaimNazis -8 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:11:23 ago (+1/-9)

Yes, God forbid that people intrude on your echo chamber.

The right can't win because they're too busy conducting witch hunts.

[ - ] Hall_of_Cost 5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:27:53 ago (+5/-0)

Shut up, faggot.

[ - ] Clubberlang 4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 20:59:23 ago (+4/-0)

You misconstrue witch hunt with bitch hunt.

You're of the later.

[ - ] bobdole9 8 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 11:52:35 ago (+9/-1)

Banned? No.

Endlessly mocked and harassed in hopes he'll fuck off? Hasn't worked so far, should probably keep trying.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:03:08 ago (+5/-0)

keep doing things that don’t work

Don’t you have a Qult board to get back to, voter?

[ - ] bobdole9 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 18:54:40 ago (+2/-0)

What would you do regarding Porno Joe?

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 16:56:56 ago (+1/-0)

… ban porn.

[ - ] deleted 4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:42:59 ago (+4/-0)

deleted

[ - ] TheBigMan 6 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:37:51 ago (+6/-0)

I thought he outed himself a long time ago.

[ - ] DivineLight2 6 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 11:59:37 ago (+6/-0)

Not that surprised. We know jews and jew dick suckers are paid to shill for their masters.

[ - ] x0x7 5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:16:57 ago (+5/-0)

So it's actually for people with a subscription OR people who are gvt, leo, media, academics.

It's just a paywall but certain people can request the article.

But still, why does he have a subscription to that site if he's not jewish... or he has to be one of the others. So we now know he's jewish or one of the other ones. That or he's so rich he just buys a subscription to every site possible.. but then why is he wasting his time on voat?

[ - ] Rotteuxx 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:31:44 ago (+3/-3)

I requested a subscription as a private citizen, I'll wait and see if I get an account.

Does that make me a jew?

Because by your logic it means I'm jewish.

[ - ] observation1 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 17:19:40 ago (+3/-0)*

Joe admitted to dating a 13 year old when he was 19. When asked about it, would not comment further.

So what did he do to her? Did they hold hands, did they kiss, did he rape her?

All of the above are illegal in all 50 states.

You can't make advances on a minor who's brain isn't fully developed, even if they imagine it's consensual. Joe needs to be behind bars in prison, hanging from a tree, or on a conveyor system leading to the woodchipper; not spreading civil war doctrines and uploading porn.

[ - ] Markshirley 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:36:23 ago (+3/-0)

GOP = ZOG ask aipac.

[ - ] Anus_Expander 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 11:46:13 ago (+3/-0)

nothing will happen

[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 18:28:42 ago (+2/-0)

Block the glownigger.

[ - ] TheSimulacra 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:59:49 ago (+2/-0)

I did something about it myself years ago.
It’s called the block button.

[ - ] Sector7 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:47:56 ago (+2/-0)

The downside is it blinds you to what's going on.

[ - ] texasblood -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:25:42 ago (+0/-1)

They* can still see and vote on you.
Blocking isnt much good here

[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:46:08 ago (+1/-0)

Yeah. I wish that blocking excluded people from seeing my posts and replies.

[ - ] TheSimulacra 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 13, 2023 01:52:05 ago (+0/-0)

Works perfectly for me. I don't understand your problems.
Votes matter?
Who gives a fuck if they see you...you got a little dick or something?

[ - ] jsac 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:28:58 ago (+1/-0)

one of you autists please start cultivating a user block list for people to block spammers/glowniggers.... i simply dont have the time.

[ - ] dulcima 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 18:25:46 ago (+2/-0)

Why do you need someone else to decide things for you? Are you vaxed?

[ - ] jsac 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 04:13:24 ago (+1/-0)

are you fkn retarded?
"i simply dont have the time."

[ - ] dulcima 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 19:31:10 ago (+2/-0)

No, but it would appear you are.

[ - ] jsac 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 13, 2023 06:16:33 ago (+0/-0)

so lack of time = retarded Interesting equation.....

[ - ] albatrosv15 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:18:59 ago (+1/-0)*

You want my favourite whitebad jewgood coomergoy phonefaggot shillerino benned? Nah man, this is just a bad idea. They will then send another retard.

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:01:14 ago (+2/-2)

Oh for fuck sake, if I wanted to add to this conspiracy, I'd say OP is Joe. Why? Because this attention is the worst thing users can give to Joe, if mitigating the problem of Joe is what they really want. Just ignore the fucker.

[ - ] albatrosv15 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:24:07 ago (+2/-0)

Hear hear! Who knows.

[ - ] paul_neri -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 03:00:00 ago (+1/-2)

"this attention" - I am so jealous! Who do you need to sleep with around here to get 124 comments?

[ - ] CHIRO 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 03:15:11 ago (+2/-0)

I'll be publishing the secrets in my forthcoming ebook: Six Million Comments and You.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -7 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:50:07 ago (+0/-7)*

The final solution to the Joeish question is murder or imprisonment. Given that my status is rising - and rapidly lately - I reckon kwaps figure the best present mitigation strategy is lots of fake upvotes and a blizzard of bullshit from multitudes of glowing accounts surrounding this nothingburger MEMRI hubbub.

And if anyone really wants to contend that I'm simply delusional they need to reckon with my arson insurgency concept.

But they won't. Of course. Let's keep talking about this MEMRI article I couldn't read. Along with the urgent need to ban me (or block me as a 'reasonable' alternative!). Becuz reasons.

[ - ] HeyJames 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:00:25 ago (+3/-0)

Let's keep talking about this MEMRI article I couldn't read.

Why did you post something that you couldn't read?

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -6 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:12:42 ago (+0/-6)

Already explained that. It is useful as news, in building legitimacy. But I had no more access to it than anyone else. Just the article title.

Just ask yourself: if MEMRI posts an article that Siege type Nazis voted in a poll to BOMB targets in the US - which is what caused @FreeinTX to flip his lid in the first place - are we better off knowing about it or not knowing about it?

In any case plainly there's something to it. The usual biases taken into account. MEMRI doesn't just make this stuff up.

This was an attempt by a glowing account - @FreeinTX - to impugn me as a cop. With his buddies helping him. The usual shit not just on this site. But on other sites too. Here though they are having more trouble getting me banned. For now. Though from their perspective this probably isn't the worst place I could be.

[ - ] HeyJames 4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:18:45 ago (+4/-0)

Already explained that. It is useful as news, in building legitimacy

How would you know if you couldn't read it?

Just ask yourself: if MEMRI posts an article that Siege type Nazis voted in a poll to BOMB targets in the US - which is what caused @FreeinTX to flip his lid in the first place - are we better off knowing about it or not knowing about it?

Nobody knew anything because they couldn't actually read it.

In any case plainly there's something to it. The usual biases taken into account. MEMRI doesn't just make this stuff up.

How do we know if nobody could read it?

This was an attempt by a glowing account - @FreeinTX - to impugn me as a cop. With his buddies helping him. The usual shit not just on this site. But on other sites too. Here though they are having more trouble getting me banned. For now. Though from their perspective this probably isn't the worst place I could be.

Your official explanation is lazy, sloppy content sharing / journalism. Can you see why people don't want to accept your side?

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 07:02:28 ago (+2/-0)

Nigger, get this straight.

I clicked the link you posted to view the poll that you were referencing. I had intended, like just about every time you post this anti-white bullshit, to sift through it and determine where the terror factory is attempting to cure a narrative.

I had no intention of trying to "impugning you as a cop" nor do I have "buddies" trying to help me. It was your post, your links, your bullshit. No one who isn't a sub can access your links, but you posted the links. It's possible that you don't even see that paywall message so you didn't know there was one. It's also possible that you're an intellectually lazy pos and are simply posting whatever shit you can find that paints a picture of your world view, and don't even glance at the article.

If a bunch of "seige type nazis" voted in a poll, I want to see how they voted, so we can see where the terror factory fed fucks are gearing up to attack, or to make fun of the results because THERE ARE NO SEIGE TYPE NAZIS.

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 17:20:18 ago (+2/-1)

I don't give a fuck about the glow problem. I just assume the site is full of it and has been for years. I mean, the way old Voat died was pretty suspect in my opinion. But it's neither here nor there.

I just wish you'd stop spamming porn. Beautiful female form, yada, yada. Yeah, women are nice. But I don't understand why any grown man, in his right mind that is, would be motivated to share porn with strangers online, even going as far as to establish a sub for it. The best bet for any guy alive today is to give up porn. But, for the love of God, if you aren't going to do that, then keep your spank bank to yourself like every other dude. When shit leapt from magazines to the net, young guys no longer had a reason to stash their porn in the tree fort.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 18:04:43 ago (+0/-5)

The nudes are just a non-issue mostly. One reason being that I don't 'spam'. You may slide with that with this cast of suspicious characters - but if you're going to bring up basically irrelevant asides that are off topic at a minimum you should at least characterize your criticisms reasonably.

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 18:59:43 ago (+1/-1)

I'm not sure why I am supposed to consider them the suspicious characters.

Also, I may have to acknowledge you are right about my mischaracterizing your behavior as 'spamming', but you can also appreciate that, between the categories of porn and non-porn, the threshold for what can appear like spam to an anti-porn individual is going to be different. What three or four porn-posts in succession represents is going to require twenty inane cat memes in a row to elicit the same protest. It's just the difference between undesirable content and content that is intrinsically offensive (meaning its offensiveness doesn't depend on the number of posts, but can be worsened by multiple posts, whereas a cat meme is not intrinsically offensive but can become irritating if there are twenty).

In general, while I find you to be undeniably intelligent given this course's par, I've also found your habits, especially the way you tend to argue and defend various ideas, very shifty. Without having a solid case against you that is not porn-related at this point, I'm usually making a kind of 'distant' assessment as far what to think about you. As it stands, I think users here are generally warranted to treat you with suspicion. That is, I don't think you merit the benefit of the doubt.

As far as these accusations of mine being irrelevant to the thread topic, I can't deny it. But they are adjacent. They are playing a role within a broader 'cumulative case', one prominent feature of which is that it is hard to find reasons why a mentally healthy individual would participate in a Jew-hating forum when he disagrees with almost everything and every view promulgated there, from floor to ceiling, together with all of the content he posts being ubiquitously disliked. The question isn't about whether there is a way to defend your content. The question has to do with your motivation to participate voluntarily in a place where you don't fit and where the population is so small to begin with that even reconciliation would be barely worth your while. I agree with a lot that gets posted here, and I am barely around. If I disagreed with the core of Voat, I'd have nothing to do with this place.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 19:33:04 ago (+0/-5)

Well, by your own admission you're barely here so lemme give you the short version: this place is a sting operation and I'm the target. Whether you believe that or not also has no bearing on it being true.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 07:09:51 ago (+2/-0)

this whole site was designed to get me and everyone here but me is a fed.

1. You advocate for a pedo
2. You post anti-white porn
3. You, yourself, have made pedo statements
4. When asked about the jew, you call yourself agnostic "like Jared Taylor"
5. You never blame a jew for anything
6. You've downplayed the jews role in several evil things, like porn, for example
7. Your sources are all anti-white, SPLC/ADL parroting bullshit.
8. You see conspiracy where none exists.
9. You refuse to acknowledge conspiracies that are blatantly obvious


No, Joe, if anyone is a fed, it's you, and no one is "out to get you", we just don't like you and your anti-white bullshit.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -2 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 17:58:57 ago (+0/-2)

It's not just me. And I don't necessarily think the place was set up by feds. They were very clearly nesting here from the beginning though. And I'm the main target. People that come to my defense also tend to attract downvotes when they do it. This is classic target isolation.

I already know what is going on. Others don't though. I am teaching class - and this course is just about over...

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 20:53:10 ago (+1/-0)

https://files.catbox.moe/mc65ag.png

Whatever you say, officer.

[ - ] texasblood -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:49:12 ago (+2/-3)*

Least he aint back stabbing coward like alot here.
Punk ass children delibertly downvoting like it really fucking crushs a soul.
JM is barrel bottom sludge and he thrives on the disgust he breeds

[ - ] MaimNazis -7 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:12:38 ago (+0/-7)

If you care about downvotes, go back to Reddit.

[ - ] texasblood -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:28:35 ago (+0/-1)

Never made it to red it.AGAIN!!
Its the childish cowardice behavior.
Miserable fat fucks,alone for a reason.

[ - ] Rotteuxx -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:45:40 ago (+6/-7)

These forum disruption posts are definitely on the rise lately.

You're so entirely full of shit, any private citize can request a subscription by filling out the form:

https://files.catbox.moe/eulsbo.png

So many accounts attacking @Joe_McCarthy in unison, this ain't organic, there's definitely a mission to shit up the forum with these posts.

What happened, did the pedo narrative prove inefective so we're witnessing a switch to this new attack strategy?

[ - ] HeyJames 8 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:31:08 ago (+8/-0)

What happened, did the pedo narrative prove inefective so we're witnessing a switch to this new attack strategy?

What I find interesting is that instead of focusing on his rants about wanting to see 14-15 year old girls masturbating, they made up fake stories about him spreading pictures and dissemination of materials which obviously did not happen.

Joe has brought drama on himself before by endlessly posting NSFW materials without labels in non-NSFW subs. It wouldn't surprise me if a few of these accounts weren't sleepers of his. He obviously enjoys and relishes in the drama and these attacks are not always based in fact (of which there is plenty of) but usually have at least a few elements of fiction, if not fictitious in their entirety.

[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:52:41 ago (+5/-0)

Knowing Joe's post history, I highly doubt he doesn't at least skim over the crap he posts, which means he's trying to cover up the fact that he had a subscription or a copy. There's no reason to deny having a subscription, which means he had a copy through other means.

[ - ] Rotteuxx -3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:20:56 ago (+1/-4)

I fail to see how his post history is a reliable metric by any means to determine if he actually reads what he posts. He probably liked the headline and that's all it took.

That's over 50% of articles that get posted on here, catchy headlines and OP has no fucking clue what's written past that.

[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 17:00:52 ago (+2/-0)

Because he does actually seem to read the content he posts, and frequently comments on what he posted as well as snippets from the article he posted.

[ - ] germ22 4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:08:20 ago (+4/-0)

I've seen more posts complaining about users than posts from those users in question themselves.

[ - ] Spaceman84 -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:25:12 ago (+2/-3)

Many such cases!

[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:42:23 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Rotteuxx -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:27:45 ago (+2/-3)

Blue haired & dickless college students are working their summer jobs...

[ - ] olinneserpona 4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:23:52 ago (+5/-1)*

ONLY GOVERNMENT, MEDIA, AND ACADEMIA WITH FULL CREDENTIALS WILL BE GIVEN ACCESS TO DTTM REPORTS. IF YOU DO NOT QUALIFY PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT A REQUEST.

*I was wrong on this one, read below.

[ - ] Rotteuxx -2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:25:17 ago (+1/-3)

Your pilpul game sucks donkey balls, especially since you're misquoting to a guy who actually read the page, fucking retard.

Here's the real quote from the website:

NOTE: WE ARE ABLE TO PROVIDE A COPY ONLY TO MEMBERS OF GOVERNMENT, LAW ENFORCEMENT, MEDIA, AND ACADEMIA, AND TO SUBSCRIBERS; IF YOU DO NOT MEET THESE CRITERIA PLEASE DO NOT REQUEST.

Since you only have the mental agility of a 3 yo when playing the pilpul game, here's what it means:

If you're not a suscriber, then you must be from a govt agency, law enforcement, academia or media to obtain a copy through your official email.

If you're a suscriber, which is open to private citizens, you don't fucking need to ask for a copy.

[ - ] Ozark 5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:33:33 ago (+5/-0)

That's a hell of shit sandwich your trying to sell. I'm not buying.

[ - ] Rotteuxx -2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:35:40 ago (+1/-3)

The fuck are you rambling about?

Go screen cap the page I'm referring to, post it as a reply and we'll talk again later.

[ - ] Sector7 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:45:06 ago (+3/-0)

I think you're wrong on this one, or at least on the meaning of the text.

AND TO SUBSCRIBERS; IF YOU DO NOT MEET THESE CRITERIA PLEASE DO NOT REQUEST.

This begins an entirely new thought after the list of criteria. Looks like you have to be a subscriber in the first place. Then, if you meet one of those criteria, you can also access next level info.

You can be a subscriber, but you're unable to access the next level info unless you're also a MEMBER OF GOVERNMENT, LAW ENFORCEMENT, MEDIA, or ACADEMIA.

That what the text is saying. Keep us posted on your sub request.

[ - ] chrimony 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:59:00 ago (+3/-0)

Well it's bad and ambiguous English, either way you take it.

[ - ] olinneserpona 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 14, 2023 14:22:29 ago (+1/-0)

You are absolutely right, I read to fast with drinks. I'll throw in a request.

[ - ] olinneserpona 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 14, 2023 14:28:55 ago (+1/-0)

I sendt them a request, ill post the reply as soon as I get one

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 12, 2023 21:01:31 ago (+0/-0)

ONLY GOVERNMENT, MEDIA, AND ACADEMIA WITH FULL CREDENTIALS WILL BE GIVEN ACCESS TO DTTM REPORTS. IF YOU DO NOT QUALIFY PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT A REQUEST.

This is part of the subscriber application.

If you're "organization" email doesn't check out, you don't get in.

[ - ] olinneserpona 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 14, 2023 14:23:52 ago (+1/-0)

Yes I got his totally wrong. Thanks for pointing it oput

[ - ] olinneserpona 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 14, 2023 14:20:05 ago (+0/-0)

I

Here is the entire text for other lazy#ies:

YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO THE MEMRI DOMESTIC TERRORISM THREAT MONITOR (DTTM) TO READ THE FULL REPORT. GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA CAN REQUEST A COPY BY WRITING TO [email protected] WITH THE REPORT TITLE IN THE SUBJECT LINE. PLEASE INCLUDE FULL ORGANIZATIONAL DETAILS AND AN OFFICIAL EMAIL ADDRESS IN YOUR REQUEST. NOTE: WE ARE ABLE TO PROVIDE A COPY ONLY TO MEMBERS OF GOVERNMENT, LAW ENFORCEMENT, MEDIA, AND ACADEMIA, AND TO SUBSCRIBERS; IF YOU DO NOT MEET THESE CRITERIA PLEASE DO NOT REQUEST.

You are right, but in my defense, and it is a good defense, I was quite drunk(as I am now). The pilpul accusations howeevr you can stick up your wannabe NatSoc jwefucked asshole, cheerio!

[ - ] Spaceman84 -4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:06:41 ago (+3/-7)

The glownigger club wants Joe gone. That's good enough for me to appreciate him despite his jew apologism. I don't have to like him or agree with him. Dumb niggers and faggots can't stand him and I enjoy seeing them cope and seethe. Get fucked glowies.

[ - ] Her0n 4 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:16:17 ago (+7/-3)

You've been suspected of being a jew and/or fed in the past yourself.

Birds of a feather, no?

[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:32:12 ago (+2/-2)

Spaceman is not a jew or a fed. He's been around a long time and I remember him from the early days of voat. Let's not be silly here.

[ - ] Her0n 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:57:30 ago (+3/-0)

Ah we all know that jews only use new accounts.

Spaceman has made suspicious comments and posts in the past, that's all I've got.

My gut says to distrust him along with most of the users here.

You post suspicious comments yourself from time to time.

We should all face scrutiny and use the same mentality on others.

[ - ] HeyJames 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:49:22 ago (+3/-0)

Ok yeah we can't trust the weather either because it always does something different than the reports!

[ - ] Her0n 3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:57:55 ago (+3/-0)

You missed the point entirely.

It's not mistrust in the weather, it's mistrust in the weather reporter.

That fact that you equate spaceman to a force of nature is worrying and telling.

I'm curious as to why you are foaming at the mouth to defend spaceman over an entry level suspicion which we should always be suspect to.

I want people to question me, it keeps the truth in the light.

Why do you want me to trust some random user without question?

What ties you to spaceman?

[ - ] HeyJames 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:04:31 ago (+2/-0)

Just because you got more paranoid, suspicious, and accusatory did not make you more correct.

Facts over feelings is the way forward.

[ - ] Her0n 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:49:26 ago (+2/-0)

No answers from you.

Big surprise

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 22:48:09 ago (+1/-1)

I called it. You are guilty by association now. I'm as good as Joe and thus so are you. Retard logic at work.

[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 23:04:48 ago (+1/-0)

When people want to be retardedly paranoid, nothing will stop their verbal diarrhea

[ - ] Spaceman84 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:22:34 ago (+3/-1)

Post proof faggot. I have the best submissions and my commentary is top tier.

[ - ] Her0n 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:55:23 ago (+1/-0)

You want everyone to trust you implicitly?

Questioning Spacemen is illegal!

I'm not wasting my time on something I don't care much about to begin with. I do t trust you, and you're just going to have to learn to live with that fact.

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:56:17 ago (+1/-1)

That's not what I said. Back up your allegations, nigger.

[ - ] Her0n 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:00:01 ago (+1/-0)

Anger will get you nowhere here.

Any user who is interested enough will delve through your history themselves.

I'm not going to be some fag that shits up the site with dramaposting. That's not what makes a "top tier" submission.

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:02:52 ago (+1/-1)

Entirely reasonable although I think your smear is unfounded. Faggots are welcome to review my submissions and comments.

[ - ] Rotteuxx -3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:34:09 ago (+1/-4)

And here I thought you were @AOU

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:59:01 ago (+2/-2)

To quote Paul Neri, "That hurts, man. Damn hurtful."

Not a direct quote I'm paraphrasing.

I'm absolutely free speech although I don't believe porn falls under that. If I were system I'd make that the one rule, aside from shit that would get the site in legal trouble.

[ - ] Rotteuxx -3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 15:16:52 ago (+0/-3)

KeK, I just recal someone accusing you of being AOU's alt at some point... the stupid things we remember about user names sometimes.

[ - ] Spaceman84 -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:24:12 ago (+1/-2)

Careful or the glowies and dumb niggers will call you my alt or Joe's alt or some gay retarded shit

[ - ] Spaceman84 -1 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:34:40 ago (+2/-3)

Have I? If anyone did it was probably Joe making the accusation.

Edit: I do recall some fag recently getting butthurt at me and making a post about it. I don't count any of the Aryan or Texas usernames calling people kikes. They do that as a default response.

[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:25:44 ago (+3/-3)

lmfao, because I was the one who outed you dirty kike lmfao

I'm on here to name kikes and check out memes, and the meme posting has been scant as of late so more of you kikes get named

there is no "That's good enough for me to appreciate him despite his jew apologism."

kikes are child rapists promoting the genocide of Aryans in violation of the 1949 UN Resolution on Genocide


There is no "siding" with a kike, if you side with the kikes you are either a kike or a non kike who rapes children and know the only way you get to keep raping children without getting caught is if kikes remain in control.

Your another one of these "Christcuck" insult using faggots who cries and calls everyone else insulting names but can't ever seem to use the term "kike" to refer to inbred inferiors aka the ashkenazi, it's always "jews" despite the fact this board has had plenty of info on it teaching you all about how that word has been stolen and usurped from Christians themselves. Also the very term cuck was created by right wing pro White people to describe the inferior deference kike men have to their females

the kike projects that which it is guilty of onto it's enemy to create a state of confusion.

THis is an Aryan Christian country kike faggot, you and your filth aren't welcome here anymore.

[ - ] Spaceman84 2 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:28:12 ago (+2/-0)

Typical retarded response from you. One note as always. I wonder why intelligent people have a low opinion of Christians. Perhaps that's what you're getting paid to do.

You'll never be Aryan.

[ - ] AryanPrime 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 21:43:26 ago (+2/-1)

"typical retarded response"

Nah it's a good post, you just don't like it because it has weight to it and points out the chinks in your larping.

"intelligent people"

You mean those faggots who say there are more then 2 genders and are "educated intelligent" people? kek, fuck off niggerfaggot hahahaha.

I'll always be Aryan, you don't change your genetics


Oh i suppose that sucks for you kike lmfao

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 22:27:41 ago (+0/-0)

🤡

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 22:44:12 ago (+0/-0)

You're too stupid to be a fed. Or a genuine National Socialist.

[ - ] Rotteuxx 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 14:32:59 ago (+2/-2)

That account most definitely does not belong to a White man.

[ - ] AryanPrime 1 point 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 21:40:43 ago (+1/-0)

Yes it most certainly does

[ - ] Sector7 0 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 16:02:27 ago (+0/-0)

I'm on here to name kikes and check out memes,

If you want memes, check out 'hyperborean memes' (sp?) on telegram. It's nothing but rightwing memes all day long, and he regularly cites 20 other meme channels.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -3 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 12:24:02 ago (+2/-5)

Yes, the full scope of what is going on should be clear - at least in this limited circle. Especially after what I just said about Biden.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -5 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 11:47:57 ago (+2/-7)

So nothing to do with this then?

https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=64ad33046e7f3&commentid=64ad4546111a8

...

You're an alt of HughBriss - itself a banned account, and you were getting highly upvoted calling for my ban over 2 years ago for posting content you disliked.

https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=60a9bb17d6ffa

[ - ] GayPatriot1969 -6 points 1.3 yearsJul 11, 2023 13:55:32 ago (+1/-7)

Cope and seethe.