Hey, remember when Israel took over a few t.v. stations in Ramalah in the early 2000s and broadcast nothing but porn?
That's what I think of your constant shenanigans. Men should not go through their day entertaining lust. It's always true, but it's especially true in times like these, when remaining vigilant is the most important thing we can do. Cut this shit out, man. Of course, I can't stop you from posting it to your sub, but I try to reason with people inclined to click your links: it's in your best interest not to.
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 17:23:30 ago (+1/-0)
That's interesting. Are Israeli Jews atheists or Satanists? Is this not an insult to their own morals as well? I mean, it could be viewed as mockery, i.e., "You don't want this in view; we are going to put it in view because. . .we can."
Also, you and I have gone back and forth on the Jewish role in the porn industry before. You did not win that debate. I don't care to rehash it, because there is nothing that's going to change my mind about the intrinsically evil nature of porn. I will criticize and downvote wherever I see it, though, not that internet points have much meaning for either of us. I guess I'm just a pathetic virtue signaler.
I think this so-called porn (I've argued for why it isn't porn) is actually uplifting as it reveals, for lack of a better term, Aryan beauty, which is worth fighting for. And thus inspirational.
And as this is Playboy I'll also note again that even the religious right friendly Meese Commission didn't include Playboy and Penthouse on their list of pornographic publications in a time, the 80s, that was pre-internet where people were much less desensitized to porn than they are now.
So at best I dare say you're pretty far on the prude scale. Maybe you should just try watching what I post. Maybe this'll sound like manipulation or something but doing that is the best teacher. Little Caprice in that link is a great start. She is awe inspiring there.
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 18:30:45 ago (+1/-0)*
You didn't.
It has nothing to do with being a prude. I used to be addicted to porn. That enjoyment doesn't go away just because you will against indulging it any longer. I love the female body. Porn is tremendously easy. It's right there at the click of a mouse. There are things which are good but which become distorted in terms of motivations, access, and lack of virtue. Do you think it's cool to share how much these women get you off? Does it arouse you to assert your sexuality in front of other people? I get it. Being recognized as a sexual creature, a carnal creature, in terms of your desires, can itself be a desirable thing. It feels good to roll in the shit and to just give in to your animal nature. It can even arouse others, women especially, to hear a man express this side of himself.
But as men, we need to be in control. Satisfying our desires can quickly become vicious without control.
You try to mask your sin by making it appear virtuous. My word! You're ringing the bell of white beauty! You're making men appreciate her! And doesn't she want that, too!? Is she not paid for it, even? Well, look at that, it's a regular win-win.
You'd make a fine devil, Joe, and I suppose that's something you relish even. But even his attractiveness is fleeting and superficial. It's the type of thing that gives way quickly to the appearance of exactly what he is in reality, weak, juvenile, impulsive, and cowardly. And men will find these qualities in the pornographic experience, reliably. A man need not work or sacrifice or display any worthwhile qualities to earn the woman in porn. She isn't real. She only appears that way. He sits behind a fucking computer screen and just observes, like a cuckold. It's regression to childhood, a movement away from being a mature male. It's weakness and submission to things we can't control, and the crippling of our ability to exert self-control. This behavior is the antithesis of strong masculinity in the long run. Like the libertine rakes and playboys, it has an allure for just a minute, before giving way to an ugly reality. Just vapors.
No, I'm no prude. I just realized that man should pursue the things in the world that bring him in contact with real women, and he should fuck the woman he loves, and make children. He should not indulge his inner boy with a veritable buffet of falsehoods while he cranks his dick all by himself, like some lowly animal, a chimp rubbing itself compulsively, or a rat with a dopamine drip in its cage.
Let me ask you a question. Do you think family is important? Are children important? If you had a daughter, is there any possibility that, if you loved her genuinely, you could want a life for her in the porn industry? To be treated like meat for strangers to gawk at and masturbate over? To be livestock for a perverse industry? No, there is no loving parent who can want this for their child.
But the girls in these vids. . .they are someone's child. They aren't just something to cum to. That's a result of the illusion, the myopia your sin creates. The perversion permits you to see things that way, through the rosy and self-indulgent veneer, the very veneer that always breaks due its superficiality. No, that's a person in the video. That's someone's daughter. I already know what you'll say, but I simply don't give a shit anymore.
To love someone is not simply to appreciate them materially. To love someone is to will the good for them, not just your own good deriving from their instrumentality. There's nothing wrong with having carnal desire, or wanting to fuck a woman so bad it hurts. But men are the control element of a society. It's up to us to marshal our desires and our strength, to resist the animal in us for something higher. You should absolutely want to fuck a woman until she has come to the brink of crying from ecstasy. But that woman should be your wife, and it should be that good because it is something you both mutually reserve for each other.
Being a watcher is pathetic, and that's not just an insult I throw around for lack of a better term. It is pathetic by its very nature.
I wouldn't care if a daughter wanted to be a solo girl or camgirl for a year or two out of her young adult life. Beats being a wagie. And if a woman can work as a secretary and yet become a wife - there is every reason a camgirl can too. Doing that even increases her chances as it increases the number of men in her social circle. Men, I might add, that aren't cucks. Actual porn requires that a man be in the picture.
The one thing you mentioned there that is of real value is how women are aroused by libertines, or men that are daring sexually or even otherwise. That is very true. It also does much to explain the resistance I encounter. I'm a terrorist, a very dangerous one, and if I get the women the men follow...
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 18:58:41 ago (+1/-0)*
At best you are a destabilizer, but the lesson you've not learned, and what tells me everything I need to know, is how this juvenile way of being guarantees a few things:
(1) You aren't getting women, Joe. Not in the sense you want people to think. You're a bottom-feeder. The women you might scrape up mean nothing to themselves or anybody else. That's why they're scrape-able.
(2) The intrigue you generate lasts for moments. They'll hate you when they realize what you are.
(3) You won't get any woman worth her salt unless you can generate the loyalty of other men. In that sense, you are to the race of men what the girl is to the race of women who only has 'guy friends' because she 'can't get along with other women'.
You're a terrorist in your own mind. Keep sliding into those DMs, playboy. Cast your net. If there is one service you're doing for the rest of us, it's putting a giant scarlet letter T for trash on any woman who gives you the time of day.
Any guy who can say he wouldn't care if his daughter was a camgirl isn't anybody I want to talk to. See you around.
As far back as the second Bush administration I recall a poll on a fantasy football forum asking if one would approve if one's daughter posed in Playboy. That was 15 years ago and it was about 50-50. Would probably be closer to 2/3 yes today. If not higher. Pretty middle America, a fantasy football crowd. Fast forward to now and girls can fuck themselves on camera right from their mom's house. No studio exploitation need even be involved anymore. It's kinda ridiculous to expect that no loving mother, especially, is going to allow that in favor of sending their daughter to work in a diner to get sexually harassed in person by her boss.
You just lack imagination. You have all the usual cliches.
I'm going to ask you, or anyone that takes your dismissive tone, to reckon with my arson insurgency concept in considering the terror question. I mean, if it wasn't screamingly obvious before what is going on...
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 19:19:25 ago (+1/-0)
You've used almost every cliche a reasonable person would expect to hear: boring, unimaginative, sterile, etc. You're so progressive and forward-thinking.
A person can't be unrooted. There have to be some truths under the sun that are unchanging. As long as we're human beings, a man who doesn't protect his daughter from sexual exploitation by strangers is no man at all.
Another firm rule: let's not trust the opinions of people on fantasy football forums to represent either (a) how those people would behave in the real world, when it mattered, or (b) what the average person thinks, given that a bunch of guys who spend their time answering polls on fantasy football forums about their daughters posing naked may not be the most representative or desirable sample on earth.
What is the arson insurgency concept? I've seen you mention this twice now. I don't have a problem 'reckoning' with much of anything.
You probably need to set aside some time and read my posts over the last month or so.
There are an awful lot of girls getting naked on the internet. And I know about 1 in 5 college age girls or thereabouts in the UK have done some kind of sex work. This is becoming a mass phenomenon - and women are very clearly sexually aroused doing this knowing it can be in front of audiences equivalent to mid-sized countries. The fathers are probably aroused by their daughters doing it. I mean, we all know how this works...
I'm going to have to admonish you as I strongly object to slut shaming women for getting naked and doing solo fare. That sends them mixed messages. They need to be praised to the rooftops for it and encouraged to do it. That way they and others will do it.
Nope. On a fundamental level naked women are simply a good thing. What is embarrassing is this is at all controversial. Real people mostly don't care though... or they like to watch the girls do it. Sex is generally seen as light and innocuous by most people, in and of itself. And this has little of the baggage. I think I argued somewhere that if you're worried about looking at naked women you should probably stop eating meat or something too. Both have SOME potential for harm. Many things do.
This has been up over 45 minutes with no downvotes by the way. Maybe we need a ceasefire where I pledge not to talk about burning the country down for a month and focus on butt ass naked women. In exchange no downvoting - at least other than what is organic.
Edit: 1 downvote on the thread. If I see 3 I have a wildfires article on hand to post. It's a funny one too.
Edit 2. 3 downvotes. The wildfires article is going up.
LOL from the link, "Unfortunately nude scenes like this one prove once again that Jennifer Lawrence is a sickeningly salacious slut, and that she is still unrepentant for her egregious crimes against morality."
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 15:20:36 ago (+1/-1)
That's what I think of your constant shenanigans. Men should not go through their day entertaining lust. It's always true, but it's especially true in times like these, when remaining vigilant is the most important thing we can do. Cut this shit out, man. Of course, I can't stop you from posting it to your sub, but I try to reason with people inclined to click your links: it's in your best interest not to.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -2 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 17:16:45 ago (+0/-2)
https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=62d00521731df
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 17:23:30 ago (+1/-0)
Also, you and I have gone back and forth on the Jewish role in the porn industry before. You did not win that debate. I don't care to rehash it, because there is nothing that's going to change my mind about the intrinsically evil nature of porn. I will criticize and downvote wherever I see it, though, not that internet points have much meaning for either of us. I guess I'm just a pathetic virtue signaler.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -2 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 17:50:26 ago (+0/-2)
I think this so-called porn (I've argued for why it isn't porn) is actually uplifting as it reveals, for lack of a better term, Aryan beauty, which is worth fighting for. And thus inspirational.
And as this is Playboy I'll also note again that even the religious right friendly Meese Commission didn't include Playboy and Penthouse on their list of pornographic publications in a time, the 80s, that was pre-internet where people were much less desensitized to porn than they are now.
So at best I dare say you're pretty far on the prude scale. Maybe you should just try watching what I post. Maybe this'll sound like manipulation or something but doing that is the best teacher. Little Caprice in that link is a great start. She is awe inspiring there.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 18:30:45 ago (+1/-0)*
It has nothing to do with being a prude. I used to be addicted to porn. That enjoyment doesn't go away just because you will against indulging it any longer. I love the female body. Porn is tremendously easy. It's right there at the click of a mouse. There are things which are good but which become distorted in terms of motivations, access, and lack of virtue. Do you think it's cool to share how much these women get you off? Does it arouse you to assert your sexuality in front of other people? I get it. Being recognized as a sexual creature, a carnal creature, in terms of your desires, can itself be a desirable thing. It feels good to roll in the shit and to just give in to your animal nature. It can even arouse others, women especially, to hear a man express this side of himself.
But as men, we need to be in control. Satisfying our desires can quickly become vicious without control.
You try to mask your sin by making it appear virtuous. My word! You're ringing the bell of white beauty! You're making men appreciate her! And doesn't she want that, too!? Is she not paid for it, even? Well, look at that, it's a regular win-win.
You'd make a fine devil, Joe, and I suppose that's something you relish even. But even his attractiveness is fleeting and superficial. It's the type of thing that gives way quickly to the appearance of exactly what he is in reality, weak, juvenile, impulsive, and cowardly. And men will find these qualities in the pornographic experience, reliably. A man need not work or sacrifice or display any worthwhile qualities to earn the woman in porn. She isn't real. She only appears that way. He sits behind a fucking computer screen and just observes, like a cuckold. It's regression to childhood, a movement away from being a mature male. It's weakness and submission to things we can't control, and the crippling of our ability to exert self-control. This behavior is the antithesis of strong masculinity in the long run. Like the libertine rakes and playboys, it has an allure for just a minute, before giving way to an ugly reality. Just vapors.
No, I'm no prude. I just realized that man should pursue the things in the world that bring him in contact with real women, and he should fuck the woman he loves, and make children. He should not indulge his inner boy with a veritable buffet of falsehoods while he cranks his dick all by himself, like some lowly animal, a chimp rubbing itself compulsively, or a rat with a dopamine drip in its cage.
Let me ask you a question. Do you think family is important? Are children important? If you had a daughter, is there any possibility that, if you loved her genuinely, you could want a life for her in the porn industry? To be treated like meat for strangers to gawk at and masturbate over? To be livestock for a perverse industry? No, there is no loving parent who can want this for their child.
But the girls in these vids. . .they are someone's child. They aren't just something to cum to. That's a result of the illusion, the myopia your sin creates. The perversion permits you to see things that way, through the rosy and self-indulgent veneer, the very veneer that always breaks due its superficiality. No, that's a person in the video. That's someone's daughter. I already know what you'll say, but I simply don't give a shit anymore.
To love someone is not simply to appreciate them materially. To love someone is to will the good for them, not just your own good deriving from their instrumentality. There's nothing wrong with having carnal desire, or wanting to fuck a woman so bad it hurts. But men are the control element of a society. It's up to us to marshal our desires and our strength, to resist the animal in us for something higher. You should absolutely want to fuck a woman until she has come to the brink of crying from ecstasy. But that woman should be your wife, and it should be that good because it is something you both mutually reserve for each other.
Being a watcher is pathetic, and that's not just an insult I throw around for lack of a better term. It is pathetic by its very nature.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -2 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 18:43:39 ago (+0/-2)
I wouldn't care if a daughter wanted to be a solo girl or camgirl for a year or two out of her young adult life. Beats being a wagie. And if a woman can work as a secretary and yet become a wife - there is every reason a camgirl can too. Doing that even increases her chances as it increases the number of men in her social circle. Men, I might add, that aren't cucks. Actual porn requires that a man be in the picture.
The one thing you mentioned there that is of real value is how women are aroused by libertines, or men that are daring sexually or even otherwise. That is very true. It also does much to explain the resistance I encounter. I'm a terrorist, a very dangerous one, and if I get the women the men follow...
https://ia903107.us.archive.org/35/items/20191225_20191225_1902/Atomwaffen%20Division%20-%20%2812%29%20SIEGE%20-%20Family.mp4
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 18:58:41 ago (+1/-0)*
(1) You aren't getting women, Joe. Not in the sense you want people to think. You're a bottom-feeder. The women you might scrape up mean nothing to themselves or anybody else. That's why they're scrape-able.
(2) The intrigue you generate lasts for moments. They'll hate you when they realize what you are.
(3) You won't get any woman worth her salt unless you can generate the loyalty of other men. In that sense, you are to the race of men what the girl is to the race of women who only has 'guy friends' because she 'can't get along with other women'.
You're a terrorist in your own mind. Keep sliding into those DMs, playboy. Cast your net. If there is one service you're doing for the rest of us, it's putting a giant scarlet letter T for trash on any woman who gives you the time of day.
Any guy who can say he wouldn't care if his daughter was a camgirl isn't anybody I want to talk to. See you around.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 19:13:06 ago (+0/-1)*
You just lack imagination. You have all the usual cliches.
I'm going to ask you, or anyone that takes your dismissive tone, to reckon with my arson insurgency concept in considering the terror question. I mean, if it wasn't screamingly obvious before what is going on...
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 19:19:25 ago (+1/-0)
A person can't be unrooted. There have to be some truths under the sun that are unchanging. As long as we're human beings, a man who doesn't protect his daughter from sexual exploitation by strangers is no man at all.
Another firm rule: let's not trust the opinions of people on fantasy football forums to represent either (a) how those people would behave in the real world, when it mattered, or (b) what the average person thinks, given that a bunch of guys who spend their time answering polls on fantasy football forums about their daughters posing naked may not be the most representative or desirable sample on earth.
What is the arson insurgency concept? I've seen you mention this twice now. I don't have a problem 'reckoning' with much of anything.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 19:26:52 ago (+0/-1)
There are an awful lot of girls getting naked on the internet. And I know about 1 in 5 college age girls or thereabouts in the UK have done some kind of sex work. This is becoming a mass phenomenon - and women are very clearly sexually aroused doing this knowing it can be in front of audiences equivalent to mid-sized countries. The fathers are probably aroused by their daughters doing it. I mean, we all know how this works...
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 13:12:05 ago (+2/-1)
Hmm, I was wrong. It is JL. Looks like a good movie, JL can draw upon being a whore to movie producers to act that out.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 13:25:03 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 22:50:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 22:57:47 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 13:35:23 ago (+0/-1)
https://files.catbox.moe/oe9ts7.mp4
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 12:06:12 ago (+1/-1)
Very nice ass.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 12:52:48 ago (+0/-1)*
Edit: 1 downvote on the thread. If I see 3 I have a wildfires article on hand to post. It's a funny one too.
Edit 2. 3 downvotes. The wildfires article is going up.
[ + ] RomeoCasanova
[ - ] RomeoCasanova 2 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 13:04:04 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 13:11:02 ago (+1/-1)
https://celebjihad.com/jennifer-lawrence2/jennifer-lawrence-nude-scene-from-no-hard-feelings-first-look
I say super butt ass naked - but that's kinda wrong. She needs to go solo for that really. And of course she should.
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 13:15:06 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 13:06:32 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -1 points 1.9 yearsJul 13, 2023 13:22:02 ago (+0/-1)
https://celebjihad.com/jennifer-lawrence2/jennifer-lawrence-nude-scene-from-red-sparrow-remastered-and-enhanced
But maybe someone needs to watch Red Sparrow.