Sign into an existing account

Crypost more niggerfaggot kike

Still cry posting? Nobody cares, you and HT both act like niggers

If anyone agreed to do that you'd shit yourself and hide.

Keyboard cowboy.

Great points and even better questions. I wrestle with them myself. I don't have any authoritative answers. Just thoughts.


So, for me, belief in a creator God isn't fundamental. I think metaphysical arguments are the way to approach it. For the sake of argument, let's just say God exists, and God is roughly the God of classical theism.

One answer to your question might be that we experience the unfoldment of divine revelation and action, we are not the divine actor Himself. That means we experience time from within time. But if we suppose a narrative structure like beginning, middle, and end, then the eternal God does not experience His own act the way we do. That would mean the redemptive side of things- the Christ parts - were already known to Him. In fact, they aren't different in the sense of being 'after' anything else.

If this is true, then God knows that God will incarnate as a human being (a hypostatic union). If God knows this, then it might help make sense of the fact that God would prepare a distinct people for His eventual coming, and that this people would be the culture in which the divine mother would bear the divine Son. After all, if God becomes a man, then God is one, and God is born to one woman.

To challenge this would be to challenge why God would reveal Himself this way at all, which is really going to get us into questions about God's nature and speculation about 'best possible worlds'.


The Jews were routinely fucking up. It isn't obvious that the old covenant had much of anything to do with 'ruling the world', either that God made that promise or that this coming to fruition is a sign of human fulfillment of their 'end.'


That's precisely what the Jews rejected, which is to say they rejected Jesus because Jesus did nothing they thought fulfilled the promise of the messiah.


First, it's a pretty convoluted story for the Jews to hate Jesus enough to kill Him and then also use Christianity to rule the world. It woupdn't have at all been clear that Christianity was going to rule the world anyway. That wasn't what Jesus preached - quite the opposite rather. Jesus's was a terrible message to preach if ruling the world is what you hoped your golem would accomplish.

Not only that, but it doesn't mesh well with 1st century history. What need was there for the Jewish war with Rome or the Bar Kokba revolution that destroyed the literal centerpiece (the temple) of Jewish life and resulted in their disaspora from Jerusalem, if they'd set up Christianity to rule the world. This just doesn't make any sense at all.


Jesus very explicitly rebukes this world and its rulership. He preached of the world to come. Jesus did open the covenant to the whole world, but that covenant had nothing to do with an earthly kingdom.

I won't drone on any longer. In the bigger picture, I think it is staggering that the following fact is true: that global elite, who are supposed to be at the helm of scientific and rationalistic modernism, a brave new world, are not atheists. Not even close. They believe in the supernatural, and they (the Jews) still sacrifice people and drink their blood. This is a very strange thing. It is hard to overstate how strange.

But things seem to make a little more sense if we entertain the possibility that there really is something with the blood. That physicalism and materialsm, as theories, are not true. That the reality of human beings goes beyond mere matter.

We can then note that much of the sacraments and liturgy of these ruling elites appears to mimic Christianity. Namely, the Eucharistic sacrifice.

It is also worth noting that if Christianity was working so well to rule the world, the world elite seem to hate it with a passion. There isn't a more persecuted religious group on the planet today. If Christianity has worked as a golem for milennia, why oppose it? Why create enemies for it? Sometimes these theories wind up tying themselves in knots.