☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
15

Majority of voters believe Australia’s migration intake is too high

submitted by UncleDoug to Australia 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 08:21:30 ago (+15/-0)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/r9t1fm.PNG

SMH

Only 3 per cent of voters regarded the nation’s overseas migration numbers as being “too low”, while 59 per cent said they were “too high” and 25 per cent believed they were “about right” when asked about federal government projections the intake would surge to a record high of 400,000 this year before falling next year.

(400K so far and the year is not over, the govt expects it to hit above 600K target easily, amongst the worst housing crisis in the nations history)

59% Australians are outraged that migration is outrageously high, triple what it was after the Rudd/Abbott increase.
25% "Australians" are first year migrants from shitholistan, that want more brown, fighting aged men to enter the country.
13% Are undecided bots that should be chemically castrated.
3% Communists and jews that want to increase migration above 600K p/a; the skies the limit!

SBS from 2018 pre-pandemic

The annual poll found 54 percent thought the intake was too high - up 14 points from the same poll last year.

Back when skilled migrant quotas were 180K/200K p/a

Current migrant quota 600K + to infinite p/a, we are at ethnic replacement levels in as little as 5-10yrs at the current estimates, in every major Eastern seaboard city.

Half of Australia’s permanent migrants are now Australian citizens
Only half bother to become citizens, 20% of the overall intake are never employed and are just a burden on the tax payer, all of them are pakis, niggers and gooks.


19 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 08:35:37 ago (+1/-2)

a) if a majority votes; then a minority rules them...why would a minority rule in favor of a majority; when it implies strengthening their opposite?

b) instead of voting for others as ones representative; why not try to RE (respond to) PRESENT (presented by) as oneself?

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 08:43:28 ago (+1/-0)

No one voted to incease migration levels, it was a poll of registered voters (everyone above 18 with permanent residency), about what they thought of the ever increasing migration quotas.

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 09:01:40 ago (+1/-2)

No one voted to...

Almost everyone consents to suggested voting; hence to representative government. That implies shirking ones response-ability (choice) onto others, hence giving others the power of ones consent to GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind/memory).

The only vote one has represents free will of choice...as long as each one of the many ignores that; so long will the "chosen ones" govern their minds. Any vote for others implies ones ignorance of self, which will be ruthlessly exploited by others.

From a different perspective...before "the government" comes ones consent to suggested THE-ism aka to the authority of others, who in return gain control (govern) over ones mind (ment) through ones consent.

MIGRA'TION, noun (Latin migratio) - "removing from one to another"...this isn't about shuffling goyim around; but about how consenting to suggestions removes choice from self through willing ignorance.

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 09:18:03 ago (+1/-0)

It has nothing to do with voting or not voting, its about a poll.

People, not just any people, registered voters were asked one question, because why would you ask the Fijian tourist?

The question asked was:

Do you personally think these new levels of migration are ...? Too high, About Right, undecided, or too low.

[ - ] Sector7 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 11:46:57 ago (+0/-0)

Registered voters are government supporters, so they're all for immigration. Look at actions, not rhetoric.

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 12:06:50 ago (+0/-0)

Registered voters are government supporters

Voting is compulsory in Australia for everyone over the age of 18. Everyone is automatically registered and voting works about as well here as it does in the banana republic of USA.

This story has NOTHING to do about VOTING, or running political party policies pre-election, or plebiscites, referendums, or anything voting related.

No running party said vote for me and do X and increase migration as their slogan for elections.

The ENTIRE article clearly states:

Resolve Political Monitor asked 1610 eligible voters their views on migration and other issues over four days to July 15

1610 people who are residents and not tourists, were asked what their thoughts are on the massive increase in migration at present.

That's it, nothing more, nothing less, nothing to do with republics, constitutional monarchies, nothing to do with voters voting on political reforms, nothing at all other than the poll. Nothing to do with voting, nothing at all, no one bit about voting, or voting-related activities.

What's that, voting, you know it doesn't work, right? Who gives a flying fuck? This story has NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH, ABOUT, ADJACENT OR AROUND VOTING, IN EVEN THe BROADEST SENSE.

Do you know what this story is about? Not about voting, if only I could find what this article was actually about. That's right, about residents' opinions on the massive increase in nigger migration. Fucking hell, I hope it's not about voting though. Phew, its not!

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 16:49:23 ago (+0/-0)

No, you are not automatically registered. You won't get fined for not voting until you do register even though it is compulsory by law. I would know, I didn't register until my mid 20s, voted once and saw how absolutely fucking pointless it is and have since never voted. I'm yet to receive any fine.

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 20, 2023 02:38:52 ago (+0/-0)

My post has nothing to do with voting, only autistics are zoning in on that. Its like Pavlov's dog for tlol.

Do you think migration is too high? Do you want more niggers, streetshitters and gooks in the country? Did you know that upwards of 20% of migrants are never employed? Did you know only half actually make residency and citizenship? Did you know that one of the primary reasons for increased migration is White genocide/ethnic replacement, labour shortfall due to ongoing covid vaccine requirements in several sectors (law enforcement, medical, education) and to bolster politicians' investment housing portfolios?

What? I don't vote.

Lol laughably autistic this deep in the post, especially after it has already been explained an infinite amount of times.

The stub is also a huge fucking picture titled Immigration Numbers

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 20, 2023 16:18:48 ago (+0/-0)

You can't stand being incorrect ya fucking sperg.

You do know that these polls are fake, we are getting more immigrants and shitskins regardless of what you and Karen vote in a fake poll designed at giving copium to boomers.

Majority of Australians wore a mask and gave in to their government, majority of Australians are going to vote yes on the voice out of fear of being called a racist.

If you think voting matters then no wonder you believe in the moon landings ya fucking sped.

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 21, 2023 00:04:10 ago (+0/-0)

Of coruse we are getting a flood of brown irrespective of what people want.

But even your goyslop consuming, footy watching boomer is saying migration is too high. Do you talk to people outside your flat?

If you still think this post is about voting, you are a mongoloid.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 10:02:13 ago (+0/-1)

deleted

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 10:04:28 ago (+1/-0)

^ jew autist confirmed

[ - ] deleted -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 10:25:30 ago (+0/-1)

deleted

[ - ] HeavyBrain 2 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 09:02:59 ago (+2/-0)

H...How is "too low" even an option ?

[ - ] dulcima 3 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 09:09:42 ago (+3/-0)

"We were never asked".

[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 11:43:57 ago (+1/-0)

How many of them are paying income taxes to support increased immigration?

[ - ] La_Chalupacabra 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 15:44:00 ago (+1/-0)

That's entirely counterintuitive.
It would make sense to rehabilitate the economy from the covid madness before putting any additional strain upon it.
This risks recession or collapse.

[ - ] Ragnar 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 18:31:21 ago (+1/-0)

One is too high

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 20, 2023 00:53:19 ago (+0/-0)

I think that's always been the case.