Sign into an existing account

Peterson is so mainstream regarding how he views The Holocaust and I'm not sure how I feel about that. I don't think that there's any lack of evidence for beastly, inhumane treatment by the NAZIs. This is something that Peterson regularly latches onto and this makes sense, given his work on, and understanding of, human nature.

But there are so many obvious falsehoods in the narrative that we've been fed regarding the Holocaust and Peterson, who normally has a very finally tuned BS detector, seem oblivious. The fact that they were Work Camps, for example, is an important distinction from Death Camps even though there was no shortage of death, disease, and suffering especially towards the end of the war. And to be clear there were some very bad NAZIs working hard to persecute Jews and other groups in the name of promoting Germany and the master race.

But the 6 million killed story is so patently false yet Peterson never addresses it. Perhaps for the same reason he says nothing when asked about Jews in general. Do not pick battles that you have no hope of winning, and all that.

The ethnic groups that the nazis put in the camps were from populations that were producing the majority of bolshevik terrorists within Germany and surrounding territories.

Jews were obvious as the jewish population was by far the strongest supporters of bolshevism anywhere, especially during that period.

Gypsies were nomadic and moved frequently between the territories dominated by the Nazis and the Communists, they also were strong supporters of bolshevism and would spread those ideas wherever they went.

Slavs were the majority ethnic group within bolshevik regions, it's very likely that they would produce agents working for the interests of bolshevist powers.

Homosexuals were strong proponents of bolshevism, as though the bolsheviks executed the gays, they knew of their utility as a marginalized group that could be courted into working to advance the interests of bolshevism, then disposed of once bolshevism took power.

The disabled also had interests in bolshevism since they would by definition be unable to meet the standards demanded of them within nazism, again this was a group that bolshevists genocided in the countries they held power in, but knew they could use this demographic's discontentment to stir up chaos within the countries they sought to take over.

Freemasons were much like the jews in every respect except that they were gentiles, they supported bolshevism as a means of acquiring more power for their societies, these elitists were basically organized criminals who got their members involved in high-level politics.

Every group that Adolf Hitler had supposedly murdered were basically carriers of the disease known as bolshevism, and he was desperate to get rid of the ideology that was constantly churning out attacks against his people.

Attacks that were being funded and orchestrated by the USSR. Attacks that could be seen as the very first strike in the second war.

Storytellers really like to conveniently forget the events the preceded the war in order to create the illusion of the clear cut good vs evil narrative, admitting that the national socialists were being forced into taking the territories they did at the beginning of the war timeline would bring to mind the possibility that everything wasn't as clear cut as it seems.

This is why I'd like to create a way for people to see what it was like for the average german gentile to live through the time period between the two world wars, and realize that there was a reason why they would consider it a good thing to wipe out the groups who got sent to those camps. It would be upsetting for them to sympathize with their support for the only party and leader that seemed serious about improving their lot in life while everyone else at the time was more interested in stomping upon them.

People who claim that Hitler just wanted to kill these demographics would be surprised to hear about how his first solution was to send them of to other countries, including the ones ruled by the ideology they'd claim to have preferred.

People decide they hate Hitler and the Nazis, and then they will say anything that goes along with this feeling. The emotion comes first and the reasoning comes second. This is the reality of human nature. We are creatures of instinct, not of thought.

The social science faculty is for stupid people who want to be smart, and most want to live off taxes for their entire life. The social sciences are all about tax and control your reality.

The only social science subject that doesn't mess up people and has real value are Librarians. They got taken over by non profits, and until they kick them out, libraries will be increasingly on the chopping block.

Peterson's a social science psychology parasite. There's absolutely zero empirical proof behind that belief system. It's all in the wordshifting. They create what they say they're fixing.

The guy married a jew. He claims he became a drug addict past middle age. How fucking smart or insightful was that? That's someone who nobody should listen to for any reason.