Pay attention to the lyrics. A man notices a woman who's in a relationship is flirting with him while her man is away. He flirts back, almost gets in a fight with her man, and the moment he's out of the picture she starts flirting with her actual boyfriend. AKA, female hypergamy.
It's not like women back in the "good ole days" were sweet innocent little angels, everyone knew how their nature is and proceeded accordingly. Most of the shit I see guys today complain about women is stuff you were simply lied to about. We were told women aren't how they are, and low and behold, it turns out they are how they are. If only we had been told this upfront so we didn't waste years of our young lives pretending women aren't women.
I'm serious. At this point in my life I'm not really upset at how women are, I'm upset at how we were all ruthlessly lied to about how they are. Undoubtedly some female is going to pop up in the comments of this post claiming that I hate women. I don't. Simply dispassionately observing facts about women does not equate to hating them. At all. In fact, this post is literally the opposite of that.
so when talking about "back in the day" 1964 isnt far enough.
But, as this song proves, 1964 is far enough back that society wasn't lying to young men about how female nature is, which is the actual point of this post...
I just want everyone to notice how a bot/agent account operates when you engage them. You'll all notice that they didn't respond to my very simple question "Do you hate yourself?" and instead, they tried to make me emotional by pressing all the buttons they consider to be our typical "emotional triggers".
Obviously that didn't work on me, and just as obviously it was never going to work on me, but I really hope that, now that the rest of you can see it for what it is, that it never works on you either.
The best response to these sorts of tactics is to not respond. Notice that I'm not responding to them, but rather using their ineptitude as an opportunity to educate anyone who comes across this. And I'll keep doing this as long as they keep doing what they do.
At a certain point though, I do wonder how someone finds themselves getting paid barely anything to sit behind a computer and do what this extremely unintelligent person does. I'd probably off myself after about 5 years, if not sooner.
[ + ] Artificial_Intelligentile
[ - ] Artificial_Intelligentile 2 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 10:41:24 ago (+2/-0)
so when talking about "back in the day" 1964 isnt far enough.
only jews hate women.
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 3 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 10:54:11 ago (+3/-0)
But, as this song proves, 1964 is far enough back that society wasn't lying to young men about how female nature is, which is the actual point of this post...
Not that the rest of your statement is incorrect.
[ + ] Panic
[ - ] Panic 1 point 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 14:14:53 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted -4 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 10:48:01 ago (+0/-4)*
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 1 point 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 11:03:42 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted -3 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 15:57:15 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 18:02:18 ago (+0/-0)
Obviously that didn't work on me, and just as obviously it was never going to work on me, but I really hope that, now that the rest of you can see it for what it is, that it never works on you either.
The best response to these sorts of tactics is to not respond. Notice that I'm not responding to them, but rather using their ineptitude as an opportunity to educate anyone who comes across this. And I'll keep doing this as long as they keep doing what they do.
At a certain point though, I do wonder how someone finds themselves getting paid barely anything to sit behind a computer and do what this extremely unintelligent person does. I'd probably off myself after about 5 years, if not sooner.