He's not treasonous. His loyalty was never to this country. He, like every other of his kind, is representative of the migrant horde. He is doing his duty to his people the best way he knows how. He's commissioned an app to guide them, advise them of DHS and Border Patrol routes and shift information. He feigns outrage when those judeo-faggots bus them all across the United States. He pays each person who crosses $2200 a month and gives them free healthcare. He's done nothing wrong at all. He's a racial champion of shitskin invaders. We're to blame. Our weakness has enabled this domestic enemy to obtain power. Our 'right-wing' republicans serve no American interest. And we cheer for them. Hispanics are the mechanism of our destruction. The nigger is simply the weapon that has destroyed our will to fight. And the jew is the at the back, directing the campaign. Meanwhile we, collectively, do nothing. America can never be White again.
He is a domestic enemy. His aim was to subvert, not support. It was never a question of loyalty. It is theater to keep us pacified, just the the rest of our electoral and governing expressions. We don't even believe it, but we just keep playing along because the alternative is actual sacrifice and hardship. This is our fault.
We essentially agree that he is our enemy, we simply differ a bit on how to classify him. So, read this in that light. I maintain there is a difference between a subversive foreign actor and a native citizen. To draw a somewhat more stark comparison, lets say it was the 60's and he was a soviet operative. He obtains appointment, says whatever bullshit he is required to say, and then acts according to his mission. Is he a traitor? Of course not. He is a foreign operative. I simply argue Mayorkas be treated according to those considerations. There were virtually no hispanics in the United States in 1965. Now the country is over 30% spic. Rather than cow down and accept that, I argue that every hispanic resident be considered a foreign invader. Treason is simply a poorly worded, difficult to litigate, concept in American justice. It could be strengthened, made more robust, and it might when they secure total power and decide to use it against us. We're just better at handling espionage and subversion than we are at treason.
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 15, 2023 19:42:19 ago (+0/-0)
His loyalty was never to this country.
He, like every other of his kind, is representative of the migrant horde.
He is doing his duty to his people the best way he knows how.
He's commissioned an app to guide them, advise them of DHS and Border Patrol routes and shift information.
He feigns outrage when those judeo-faggots bus them all across the United States.
He pays each person who crosses $2200 a month and gives them free healthcare.
He's done nothing wrong at all.
He's a racial champion of shitskin invaders.
We're to blame.
Our weakness has enabled this domestic enemy to obtain power.
Our 'right-wing' republicans serve no American interest.
And we cheer for them.
Hispanics are the mechanism of our destruction.
The nigger is simply the weapon that has destroyed our will to fight.
And the jew is the at the back, directing the campaign.
Meanwhile we, collectively, do nothing.
America can never be White again.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 15, 2023 20:36:30 ago (+0/-0)
It is indeed a loyalty pledge.
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 1 point 1.6 yearsSep 15, 2023 20:58:44 ago (+1/-0)
His aim was to subvert, not support.
It was never a question of loyalty.
It is theater to keep us pacified, just the the rest of our electoral and governing expressions.
We don't even believe it, but we just keep playing along because the alternative is actual sacrifice and hardship.
This is our fault.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 15, 2023 21:00:45 ago (+0/-0)
He took the Oath of Office, and then intentionally violated it on day 1.
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 1 point 1.6 yearsSep 16, 2023 17:16:39 ago (+1/-0)*
So, read this in that light.
I maintain there is a difference between a subversive foreign actor and a native citizen.
To draw a somewhat more stark comparison, lets say it was the 60's and he was a soviet operative.
He obtains appointment, says whatever bullshit he is required to say, and then acts according to his mission.
Is he a traitor?
Of course not.
He is a foreign operative.
I simply argue Mayorkas be treated according to those considerations.
There were virtually no hispanics in the United States in 1965.
Now the country is over 30% spic.
Rather than cow down and accept that, I argue that every hispanic resident be considered a foreign invader.
Treason is simply a poorly worded, difficult to litigate, concept in American justice.
It could be strengthened, made more robust, and it might when they secure total power and decide to use it against us.
We're just better at handling espionage and subversion than we are at treason.