Sign into an existing account

1 million is pay off bills and house money

Yep. I'm reminded of a conversation i had at primary school circa 1980-81.
Me and my friend both agreed (still remember his name, Glen, lol) - no one would ever need more than $1 million dollars to set themselves up for life. That amount was almost obscene back then to us.
Present day - i would still consider myself a pauper - just one with a freehold home, vehicle, chattels and peripherals.

Make Shame Great Again. Society's way of keeping women from being whores, sluts, emo, druggies, etc.

Yeah, I think that's mostly right. I actually have a lot of sympathy with the girl who starts crying here; she is genuinely hurting, and probably confused. Women are under absolute assault, and most men here can't understand it, one reason being that the lot of men likeliest to wind up at this forum are disagreeable as fuck. I know I am; I recoil at mimickry of almost any kind - but life is a balance, and in truth, some is good.

The point is these women are mimicking because, as you say, that is primarily what women do. They are computers for abstracting what is popular, a mirror of culture. And this is because, even more fundamentally, women are the principle of receiving, not of bestowing. Just think sex, semen, love, etc. They receive. Right now, they are receiving, from a young age, awful messages about what being a desirable woman is. Men bristle when these women lay down their "bulleted list of demands" (for a desirable male), but even this behavior of presenting the "checklist" is something they are mimicking. In the end, these women just want to be desirable creatures. And they're living in a culture that is seemingly schizophrenic.

Men want to tell them: don't be whores, be good houswives, be chaste, etc. But those women look and find the same men going after the bimbo, or the OnlyFans whore getting millions of views and a whole 'lotta money. We are sending mixed messages every day, mostly because men have fallen into this position of wanting to TALK. Men of the political right are virtue signalling constantly, just as much as anybody on the left: this is one major trap of social media, is it has encouraged a dopamine-draining spiral of endless conversation. They think podcasts with guys virtue signalling about male qualities is the same as actually being virtuous men, because they get their "hit" from hearing the 10-sec soundbyte, and the algo studies their attention habits, and it's just a big self-perpetuating fucking cycle of shit that, in the end, is causally effete. That means it does nothing except create feeling states in the minds of viewers: that's all it does.

Men talk one game and then play another. And we wonder why women are out of control. Don't get me wrong. Men are under attack, all the same. Male and female members of our people are both under attack, but the problem we have is one for men to solve, not women.

And we aren't going to solve it by now trying to TALK to women and logic them into the right behaviors. This is completely missing the point. Men have to become better men. Men have to stop rewarding behaviors in women they don't want women to exemplify. You can't crank your dick to whores and chase these thots around, and then wonder why women want to emulate what will make them desirable. Men have to retake control of women, because women are creatures who are inherently meant to be led. Men have to oust the enemy and then be Godly men. That's all there is to it; there's no secret sauce. It's very straightforward in principle.

Hypergamy, and monkey branching to the next high value male. More men should avoid relationships.