I mean every one even criminals and felons in jail. Illigals would never even be considered to be given a vote. In a just world illigals could vote but there voted would be negative one vote.
From there the more you pay in taxes excluding corporations you would get more votes
A degree in a relevant field or the more relevant the more voting power
Married couples (((not gay))) would get more voting power
Dual citizens would have zero or negative voting power maybe one vote but not jews they would secretly get minus 10
Community service would add voting power
Every 4 years of age till 50 would get more voting power then after 50 it would be every year
I don't have the perfect system but that's kinda how it's worked through history in a way. The elders made decisions and people in power and who were invested made decisions. Never have the masses of retards had equal say
Imo there should just be reasonable voting restrictions. IE must own a gun. Must be a net tax payer. Must not be receiving any government benefits OR pay. Must have children that live with you. Must be born to two american parents.
Also black predominant areas should be made into reservations.
That use of negative votes would be a bad idea because you're still allowing illegals (including jews) to affect the outcome once they figure it out. In that system the best one can do is for those to be zero, corresponding to how much you want it to affect the outcome.
It's sort of like how a really bad comms line drops the rate of successful bits down to a 50% floor. Lower than 50% makes no sense, because you could just invert the output to get something workable, i.e. the wire is carrying the signal.
An actual negative vote option would be interesting though, if you just want to choose to vote against a candidate.
Only upper 50 percentile IQ vote. You get one extra vote (the man), per pure white baby you father. You must have both a biological and parenting relationship with them to get the extra vote. You retain that extra vote after they turn 18.
Given her response, she appears to have some type of psychological issues (rape, childhood in cage, or ?) near the surface that get easily triggered. You can see her going into it after he asks.
Less a male/female thing and more someone who's been damaged and still is.
You fell for a woman trick. This was not her trauma surfacing, this was being put on the spot to define a word that she used like a weapon but cannot even explain. She resorted to tears which has likely worked in the past to play on a decent man’s feelings.
IMO, it's not to asking her to define it, but the ACT of questioning her is the key. In this way, one cannot begin to think that anything she says can be wrong...regardless of however retarded that may be.
The problem in all of this is thinking that polite society rules bind them. What you hold as important is not what they do. They only care about pushing a viewpoint, and if questioned or confronted, then they will respond in unconventional ways; to where they react like this--real or an act, it doesn't matter. The end result is the goal.
Could be, since we don't have context, and even her reaction is edited.
If a woman trick, I fail to see a win in her results. Waving a plastic sword as a weapon, then crying and running away?
If not a trick, it looks like her inability to explain is her thinking about whatever it is that makes her cry. Then 'reliving' whatever that was. You'd have to wonder what happened to her to make her see that strategy as beneficial. "I'm just pretending to be a wreck."
That actually makes sense if it's true. She's already upset and emotional. If her immediate answer to that question in her head was that incident then her crying because it's suddenly in her face and just feeling confused and wanting to leave because she knows she's past the point of making sense are prudent.
There are plenty of bullshit definitions of mysogeny that any idiot can throw around so it's unlikely she doesn't know what the word means.
Nah, she's an onlyfans thot that was merely asked to explain her own thought process - and failed miserably because she has rarely if ever had to expand on any actual thought before.
Her most difficult and pressing issue of the day is whether it's cash/ credit or token.
Pointing out she's an online whore supports my contention that's she's been damaged.
The video has cuts and supplies no context. Aside from whatever they were talking about, no one responds like that unless something has happened to them.
Anything a woman doesn't like. it's also painfully obvious she has never in her life had her opinions questioned. To cry simply because you were asked to explain yourself... that's something a child does.
Misogyny is when men question you. Aka, you are being asked to live up to the same standard adult men have for each other. Anyone can question my ideas. I expect it.
Women want to have opinions and debate and contribute to the contest of ideas, but they want the standards for that theater diminished. This is a net loss. Even if their ideas were as good as men's, the value of having 2x contributors to thought (which isn't much because of diminishing returns), isn't worth the loss of all standards, without which even men err.
[ + ] germ22
[ - ] germ22 22 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 09:57:24 ago (+22/-0)
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 6 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 10:57:52 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] watts2db
[ - ] watts2db 3 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 18:58:57 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 3 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:11:10 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] watts2db
[ - ] watts2db 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:12:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 16:35:56 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] iThinkiShitYourself
[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:53:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TomMacdonald
[ - ] TomMacdonald 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 20:47:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 23:30:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] iThinkiShitYourself
[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 20, 2023 00:32:37 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] iThinkiShitYourself
[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 20, 2023 00:33:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] iThinkiShitYourself
[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:53:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 23 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 05:56:01 ago (+23/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 7 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 12:01:04 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] iThinkiShitYourself
[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:55:03 ago (+0/-0)
or sumthin
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 4 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 13:14:46 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] pickingrinninspittin
[ - ] pickingrinninspittin 19 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 07:19:15 ago (+19/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:09:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GrayDragon
[ - ] GrayDragon 15 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 08:09:08 ago (+15/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 6 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 12:03:07 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] 4thTurning
[ - ] 4thTurning 6 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 16:52:23 ago (+6/-0)
He hates democracy and calls it the greatest evil on the planet.
He gives many examples of civilizations that are thousands of years old and once they become a democracy they disappear within one generation.
Why?
Because every democracy eventually just starts voting for free shit.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 17:37:59 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:21:22 ago (+0/-0)
Such transparent, deliberated purposeful gaming of an already corrupted system.
'Vote for Us - to get free x' (Dont you dare ask about all the small print strings attached).
[ + ] watts2db
[ - ] watts2db 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:01:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 10:27:45 ago (+2/-1)
All people are not equal.
Everyone gets one vote.
I mean every one even criminals and felons in jail. Illigals would never even be considered to be given a vote. In a just world illigals could vote but there voted would be negative one vote.
From there the more you pay in taxes excluding corporations you would get more votes
A degree in a relevant field or the more relevant the more voting power
Married couples (((not gay))) would get more voting power
Dual citizens would have zero or negative voting power maybe one vote but not jews they would secretly get minus 10
Community service would add voting power
Every 4 years of age till 50 would get more voting power then after 50 it would be every year
I don't have the perfect system but that's kinda how it's worked through history in a way. The elders made decisions and people in power and who were invested made decisions. Never have the masses of retards had equal say
[ + ] CoronaHoax
[ - ] CoronaHoax 5 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 10:51:32 ago (+5/-0)*
Also black predominant areas should be made into reservations.
[ + ] SithEmpire
[ - ] SithEmpire 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 20:52:54 ago (+0/-0)
It's sort of like how a really bad comms line drops the rate of successful bits down to a 50% floor. Lower than 50% makes no sense, because you could just invert the output to get something workable, i.e. the wire is carrying the signal.
An actual negative vote option would be interesting though, if you just want to choose to vote against a candidate.
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 20, 2023 00:41:23 ago (+0/-0)
Only upper 50 percentile IQ vote. You get one extra vote (the man), per pure white baby you father. You must have both a biological and parenting relationship with them to get the extra vote. You retain that extra vote after they turn 18.
[ + ] BannedEverwhere
[ - ] BannedEverwhere 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 15:20:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] rabidR04CH
[ - ] rabidR04CH 14 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 08:42:34 ago (+14/-0)
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 10:08:29 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:13:01 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] o0shad0o
[ - ] o0shad0o 8 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 08:10:52 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] CoronaHoax
[ - ] CoronaHoax 5 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 10:47:30 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 5 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 08:34:22 ago (+7/-2)
Less a male/female thing and more someone who's been damaged and still is.
[ + ] WNwoman
[ - ] WNwoman 23 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 09:22:35 ago (+24/-1)
[ + ] recon_johnny
[ - ] recon_johnny 5 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 12:04:37 ago (+5/-0)
The problem in all of this is thinking that polite society rules bind them. What you hold as important is not what they do. They only care about pushing a viewpoint, and if questioned or confronted, then they will respond in unconventional ways; to where they react like this--real or an act, it doesn't matter. The end result is the goal.
Kinda wonder where this strategy came from.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 20, 2023 07:22:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 4 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 10:07:57 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 21, 2023 06:37:31 ago (+0/-0)
If a woman trick, I fail to see a win in her results. Waving a plastic sword as a weapon, then crying and running away?
If not a trick, it looks like her inability to explain is her thinking about whatever it is that makes her cry. Then 'reliving' whatever that was. You'd have to wonder what happened to her to make her see that strategy as beneficial. "I'm just pretending to be a wreck."
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 3 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 12:06:29 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 3 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 13:42:51 ago (+3/-0)
There are plenty of bullshit definitions of mysogeny that any idiot can throw around so it's unlikely she doesn't know what the word means.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 23:29:35 ago (+0/-0)
Her most difficult and pressing issue of the day is whether it's cash/ credit or token.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 20, 2023 22:32:18 ago (+0/-0)
The video has cuts and supplies no context. Aside from whatever they were talking about, no one responds like that unless something has happened to them.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 21, 2023 05:00:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 21, 2023 12:43:24 ago (+0/-0)
You would think but no.
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 5 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 08:25:47 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 12:03:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 14:41:28 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 4 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 11:52:24 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 12:11:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 20, 2023 07:16:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Barfcock19
[ - ] Barfcock19 4 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 10:40:08 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 3 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 15:57:52 ago (+3/-0)*
[ + ] Zyklonbeekeeper
[ - ] Zyklonbeekeeper 3 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 11:23:28 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 12:13:11 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 3 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 11:17:37 ago (+3/-0)
Women want to have opinions and debate and contribute to the contest of ideas, but they want the standards for that theater diminished. This is a net loss. Even if their ideas were as good as men's, the value of having 2x contributors to thought (which isn't much because of diminishing returns), isn't worth the loss of all standards, without which even men err.
[ + ] Bigdeal
[ - ] Bigdeal 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 18:35:42 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 16:35:10 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 09:10:07 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 20:41:11 ago (+1/-0)
Women are a joke
[ + ] iThinkiShitYourself
[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:52:43 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] watts2db
[ - ] watts2db 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:00:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 16:34:34 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] Kung_Flu
[ - ] Kung_Flu 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 13:23:40 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 10:23:07 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica -3 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 10:07:43 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 19, 2023 19:16:19 ago (+2/-0)