Sign into an existing account

I'm an advocate of evil, I think we should stop looking at actions and judging them, that just holds us back from doing what provides maximum happiness and pleasure for ourselves, which is all that matters.

We should care instead about whose happiness and pleasure it benefits or harms in the long run.

Does it benefit us and people like ourselves? Then it is good.
Does it harm us and people like ourselves? Then it is evil.

Make no mistake here: who we are is white men, that's the "people like ourselves" I'm talking about.
Nobody else matters to me, except perhaps by extension in how what happens to then affects the happiness and pleasure of me and others like myself.

We like to point at the things being done by those far more successful than we, and judge them for it.

I think that is foolish, and we should be doing as they do to attain the same kinds of successes as they had.

Besides, it implies that the issue we have with them is the things they do, that's liberal cuckery being dressed up as social conservatism.
We should judge people by who they are, not what they have done, or are doing.
We have a team that we want to win, not a playbook that we want any team to win by.
Acting like us doesn't make them like us, and us acting like them doesn't make us like them.
What we are is written in our blood, not in our behaviors.

We should do as the crusaders had done when they chased the Muslims out of europe, and overcome the enemy by learning from then, and adopting what gave them their successes. When we finally beat them, that transformation will be our legacy. We can thank the worthy opponent from being the greatest teachers on things like how we should pursue our goals and run our societies.

It's eschewing moral purity for practical effect, pragmatism, expressed ethically and methodologically.

Only a shill would say there's anything wrong with it.