Would it make a fucking difference. "oh look, so-and-so is SAYING THINGS I WANT TO HEAR!"
Like somehow that absolves her or changes what she endorses or supports.
If she went balls-to-the-wall "extremist" and started spouting the "right wing" middle-of-the-road-90s-democrat conservative lines like a true-blue "nationalist", half the cock-gobbling retards in america would jump at the chance to ride her dick like they're doing now with every other flavor-of-the-month sockpuppet-'nationalists' like vivek et al, telling so many people exactly what they want to hear.
These people don't deserve to continue drawing breath.
Dum dum, you ask her the question and she responds one of two ways.
1. Names names. Would never happen, but if she did, it would be epic. Imagine being invited to speak at Davos and you throw several of their biggest players under the bus, on their own stage. Hilarious.
2. She refuses to name names and discusses the need for "the people" or their governments to pay the price (higher taxes) of the "crimes" caused by the largest players at Davos. She'd be discredited and the narrative becomes clear to the people who are now being accused of committing crimes because ExxonMobil and Blackrock can't do business in a eco-friendly way.
The way it is, is ambiguous. The average dumb fuck Joe can be easily persuaded that the environment should be protected and people who hurt the environment should have to pay for it. However, if you make it clear that the average dumb fuck Joe is gonna be the one to pay the price instead of the people doing the actual damage, even dumb fuck Joe isn't gonna fork over his wallet.
She didn't say that. there are plenty of farming and fishing laws already in place. Mass overfishing is a problem for multiple reasons, farmers spraying harmful chemicals are a problem for multiple reasons.
She may be saying what you said, it is WEF, but the little clip you linked she doesn't mention anything specifically.
I once saw a person using "hand sanitiser". They MURDERED billions of microorganisms, bacteria, viruses, and germs. BILLIONS of essential living things.
Another time someone got a "vaccination" that created antibodies within the person that then went on to murder viruses. All because that selfish person didn't want to share their body and give those viruses a place to live and reproduce.
We must learn to live alongside viruses, microorganisms, bacteria, and germs in the same way we live alongside lions, tigers, and bears. Anything else is "ecocide".
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 7 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 09:21:49 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 08:34:59 ago (+5/-0)
The worst offenders to the environment are the major globalist corps.
Would she name names or call for "climate action" to force the people to suffer for the "crimes" of these multinational multiconglomerate corps?
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz [op] 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 08:41:27 ago (+2/-0)
nobody will because ppl lacks the backbone to stand up for what is right. meh
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 16:02:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 12:21:28 ago (+0/-0)
Would it make a fucking difference. "oh look, so-and-so is SAYING THINGS I WANT TO HEAR!"
Like somehow that absolves her or changes what she endorses or supports.
If she went balls-to-the-wall "extremist" and started spouting the "right wing" middle-of-the-road-90s-democrat conservative lines like a true-blue "nationalist", half the cock-gobbling retards in america would jump at the chance to ride her dick like they're doing now with every other flavor-of-the-month sockpuppet-'nationalists' like vivek et al, telling so many people exactly what they want to hear.
These people don't deserve to continue drawing breath.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 20:28:35 ago (+0/-0)
1. Names names. Would never happen, but if she did, it would be epic. Imagine being invited to speak at Davos and you throw several of their biggest players under the bus, on their own stage. Hilarious.
2. She refuses to name names and discusses the need for "the people" or their governments to pay the price (higher taxes) of the "crimes" caused by the largest players at Davos. She'd be discredited and the narrative becomes clear to the people who are now being accused of committing crimes because ExxonMobil and Blackrock can't do business in a eco-friendly way.
The way it is, is ambiguous. The average dumb fuck Joe can be easily persuaded that the environment should be protected and people who hurt the environment should have to pay for it. However, if you make it clear that the average dumb fuck Joe is gonna be the one to pay the price instead of the people doing the actual damage, even dumb fuck Joe isn't gonna fork over his wallet.
[ + ] goatfugee12
[ - ] goatfugee12 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 15:07:38 ago (+1/-0)
She may be saying what you said, it is WEF, but the little clip you linked she doesn't mention anything specifically.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 10:34:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Zyklonbeekeeper
[ - ] Zyklonbeekeeper 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 15:05:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NoRefunds
[ - ] NoRefunds 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 21:01:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 14:17:36 ago (+0/-0)
Another time someone got a "vaccination" that created antibodies within the person that then went on to murder viruses. All because that selfish person didn't want to share their body and give those viruses a place to live and reproduce.
We must learn to live alongside viruses, microorganisms, bacteria, and germs in the same way we live alongside lions, tigers, and bears. Anything else is "ecocide".
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 12:18:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 18, 2024 11:33:01 ago (+0/-0)