×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
1

How does one distinguish between a gold digger and a responsbile woman asking financial questions?

submitted by DoYouEvenShit to AskUpgoat 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 12:48:21 ago (+1/-0)     (AskUpgoat)

I was talking to a grill the other day who was asking if I had "stable employment", which I did not answer (even though I do). And I got to thinking that I don't know what a quality woman would be doing when looking for a man. I guess this is the end of my post, and I'd like to open it up even further to ask in general how to spot a quality woman.

(in case we have any smart alecks out there, she has to be equal or under 2 sexual partners and 25 or younger first of all)


25 comments block


[ - ] beece 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 11, 2024 21:28:09 ago (+0/-0)

"I struggle, what do you do?" should be your opener.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 3 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 14:30:35 ago (+3/-0)

Learn about (or better yet, meet) her mother. Women can 'be' one thing or another, but they always become their mother.

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 3 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 13:03:44 ago (+3/-0)

Tell her about the fruits of your labors. Better...show her and let them speak for themselves.

If you have stable employment...show her the horses.

[ - ] DoYouEvenShit [op] 1 point 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 14:10:50 ago (+1/-0)

how does this help distinguish between a gold digger and a responsible woman asking financial questions?

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1.4 yearsFeb 9, 2024 05:04:45 ago (+0/-0)

By showing her the fruits of your labors; the suggested temptations (gold and finance) gain no place in-between you.

[ - ] Thyhorrorcosmic103 3 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 12:51:29 ago (+3/-0)

Women have no business involving themselves in the purview of men.

[ - ] Anus_Expander 2 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 18:24:31 ago (+2/-0)

25 yrs old = 250 dicks have been in her, minimum

[ - ] Sector2 2 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 17:35:57 ago (+2/-0)

I was talking to a grill the other day

I talk to my stove sometimes. They tend to be pretty short conversations though.

[ - ] beece 2 points 1.3 yearsFeb 11, 2024 21:26:30 ago (+2/-0)

Talking to your stove? That's hot...

[ - ] dingbat 2 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 14:43:55 ago (+2/-0)

That should just be a natural thing that comes up in conversation as you’re getting to know each other. If she is grilling you about if you have “stable employment,” that’s just kinda weird imo. Not responsible—weird. Sounds like she’s conducting a job interview and not trying to get to know you.

[ - ] Hoobeejoo 1 point 1.4 yearsFeb 9, 2024 06:38:03 ago (+1/-0)

That's definitely a "ticking off boxes on a list" kind of way to ask.

[ - ] TomMacdonald 2 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 12:58:07 ago (+2/-0)

Yeah I got a job. U? That's how you respond. Murders and executions

[ - ] DoYouEvenShit [op] 1 point 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 14:10:57 ago (+1/-0)

how does this help distinguish between a gold digger and a responsible woman asking financial questions?

[ - ] Panic 1 point 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 17:41:04 ago (+1/-0)

In every species, the female is looking for quality mating material. In advanced species, the female is looking for quality mating material plus nesting behaviors. In human society, a high quality woman wants both and that includes the male's ability to provide a nest capable of security and provisions for the young.

We aren't like turtles who dig a hole, drop some eggs and just move on. Humans raise kids for about two decades and that demands serious ability to provide a home and provisions.

Low quality women think short term, quality women think long term. Your ideal mate is putting out feelers to find an adequate mate and to eliminate short term thinking fun boys. So if a woman asks about your financial stability, she's thinking long term. Any woman not looking into your long term financial adequacy is just looking for a fuck-buddy.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 13:53:57 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] DoYouEvenShit [op] 1 point 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 15:38:36 ago (+1/-0)

all women are gold diggers.

Fair enough. And you have the only on-point comment here so far.

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 1.4 yearsFeb 9, 2024 01:30:13 ago (+0/-0)

Working part time at McDonald's is "stable employment". Doesn't mean you have money, just means you have a job that you're not likely to lose anytime soon. She's probably not a gold digger, she probably just doesn't want a guy who plays video games on his mom's couch all day. (not that I'm implying any of this is true for you)


Feel like a gold digger would be asking what you did for a living and pressing you for details. If she'd even bother talking to you to begin with, without already knowing. if she suddenly starts acting more interested if you tell her you have a 6 figure a year job, then yeah look out.

For what it's worth, I have never had a woman ask about "stable employment" unless she was interviewing me for a job. But nearly 100% of them ask me what I do for a living if it wasn't obvious. To me it seems odd if those were her exact words. I think you'd figure it out if she was a gold digger, because she'd be more hung up talking about money and spending money etc. If she's still talking more of the small talk kind of stuff, then I wouldn't worry too much.

[ - ] Nasturtium 0 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 22:21:39 ago (+0/-0)

You need to talk to her and get to know her.

Ask her what her thoughts are, on debt?

Would she do charitable work in her community?

Would she adopt an injured animal?

What is her relationship with her mother? Her dad?

Does she have manners, says thank you etc, show humility?

[ - ] Sector2 -1 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 13:21:48 ago (+0/-1)

An actually 'quality' woman would not be looking for a man that settles for wage slavery. That would be a lower tier woman who's willing to settle herself.

[ - ] DoYouEvenShit [op] 2 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 14:12:10 ago (+2/-0)

this fallacious thinking is advocating for harems, in which case all parties involved should be slaughtered the men and the women.

[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 17:36:50 ago (+0/-0)

That's an interesting theory. How so?

[ - ] BannedEverwhere 0 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 18:56:33 ago (+0/-0)

It deprives the common man of the ability to spread his genes and have a meaningful life.

[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1.4 yearsFeb 9, 2024 05:01:16 ago (+0/-0)

The common woman who has a good grasp on reality chooses the common man.

[ - ] DoYouEvenShit [op] 0 points 1.4 yearsFeb 9, 2024 01:08:25 ago (+0/-0)

basically what @BannedEverwhere said, but you're harassing women until they all just glom on the same dude. then you might as well just kill all those women and men involved because their brains are just fucked up for life and there is no returning the balance of order then

[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1.4 yearsFeb 9, 2024 05:12:19 ago (+0/-0)

you're harassing women

Where did this come from? Same question about the harems.

The point is, someone who settles for a life of wage slavery is not a top tier get. But the slave would be fine for a female of similar quality.