☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
1

if we wanted to file a lawsuit against the federal government to end forced racial integration/white genocide, what kind of person or party would our lawyer need to represent?

submitted by oppressed to law 1.3 yearsFeb 14, 2024 00:35:03 ago (+2/-1)     (law)

do we need some person or group saying forced racial integration effects them immensely negatively? and therefore the government must end the practice of force-integrating those people by law? or the laws causing forced integration must be overturned?

can you folks pontificate on this?

some facts that legally prove forced racial integration is harmful to whites are,


A Black is 35 times more likely to attack a White than the other way around.

Video evidence: https://www.bitchute.com/video/tD9C72AIpnnj/


and Despite being 5% of the population, young Black males commit 53% of all murders, 54% of all robbery.

Source: https://tinyurl.com/67tmj4zc




2 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 8 monthsSep 25, 2024 10:34:05 ago (+0/-0)*

It's a good question there have been reverse discrimination cases that have been won against the government law.

So this is already happened you would just be doing it against a different law.

I would start by looking up a "reverse discrimination cases".

You'd have to find an organization that'd be willing to file it.


I've always felt like one legal avenue for all this is the constitutional principle of freedom of association. Freedom of association has been ruled as part of the Constitution by the supreme Court I believe although I forget the details even though freedom of association is not specifically named in the Constitution I don't believe. My argument would be that forced integration in both the workplace and homes and anywhere else violates freedom of association. Freedom of association means you are free to choose who you associate with. The Constitution does not make exceptions for the workplace or anything else. You don't lose your constitutional rights at your house you don't lose your constitutional rights at your workplace.

Therefore I thought for a little while now that a lot of this stuff could be defeated if somebody said all these laws were violations of freedom of association and people should be able to build a company and choose who they associate with it that company and in their workforce.

https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment1/first-amendment-freedom-of-association.html

[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 14, 2024 01:55:37 ago (+0/-0)

Armed and committed.