×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
0

US Gun Control hurts both sides in Ukraine

submitted by LiberalsAreMental to whatever 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2024 07:07:50 ago (+0/-0)     (whatever)

If the US did not have absurd rules against smooth-bore handguns, smooth-bore guns would be common as small game getters and anti-snake guns. Those smoothbore handguns would be very useful as anti-drone guns. But, because the NFA exists, anyone back by the US is at a huge disadvantage. It would take 50 years of R&D to catch up with where we would have been.

Imagine a FPV suicide drone comes at you, and you have a select-fire machine .44 Magnum pistol (think Desert Eagle, but with a larger magazine capacity and with an extendable/foldable stock) pumping out the equivalent to .410 shotshells. The recoil is straight back, preventing muzzle rise. That's what could have been.

Instead, we have 9mm Barettas and Glocks shooting single projectiles, in semi-auto.

Even a .45LC/.410 revolver would be better than what they have right now.


3 comments block


[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2024 07:25:58 ago (+1/-0)

You can get a Taurus Judge. That's a .410 revolver kind of. Or you could get a $100 Walmart shotgun and a couple boxes of bird shot.

What the fuck are you getting at here?

[ - ] Peleg 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2024 08:40:36 ago (+0/-0)

Have you ever seen a Thomson Contender? Such a beautiful weapon. It is a single shot, breakdown gun, which is what op is bitching about, I think.
Got my first squirrel with a Contender, and I practiced until I was pretty fast at reloading. Still, though, not the same as a semi-auto.

[ - ] HatefulHomelessMan 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 24, 2024 03:25:17 ago (+0/-0)

Doesn't Birdshot from a semi-automatic shotgun knock out a drone? They're not armored, yet.