I find faggots who are obsessed with specific members of the site to be the most suspicious faggots. I thought glowniggers had refined their art better than this. Sad! Many such cases! Joe is too kind. I would have shoah’d you already.
to defend himself, joe accidentally admited he was called out for being a pedo on his conpro account too. Better question, where has joe not been found out?
What is especially suspicious maybe is how upvoted these nonsensical attack posts can get. This is seen on multiple platforms.
For example, I had a ban thread at ConPro get over 130 upvotes. My ban was briefly reversed. Then ALS got like 60 upvotes in a thread calling me a pedo. Then as I noted recently beece got over 50 upvotes in a thread calling me a cop.
Bear in mind I was not well known at the time at communities.feds.
Here we have 3 upvotes so far for transparent bullshit.
I already know what is going on. But food for thought for those that don't for sure.
That wasn't a "pro-pedophile" poll. Be interesting to see anyone here go on record thinking it was.
I like to flush out other FBI accounts. You guys all come to each other's rescue to sustain nonsense.
Years old thread. Don't even remember the specifics of why I deleted it. From the looks of the poll options though it looks like what I was asking was whether pedos on the site were worse or better than assholes calling everyone pedos. It's like characterizing something as 'pro-pedo' because you're asking whether it is worse or better than the most outrageous slanderers you've ever met.
And what's amusing is that KHK ends up highlighting the most obnoxious pedo hunter on the internet - theoldones here. So you think jagoffs like theoldones engaging in serial libel MIGHT be worse than the 'pedos' on the site? "Pro-pedophile!"
Has there ever been an actual proponent of pedophilia on Voat? You know, as in advocating sex between adults and pre-pubescents? Maybe. But if there have been they haven't caught much flack for it.
Offhand I can think of two real 'abusers' here. That Aussie conspiracy theorist who said something perhaps dodgy about under tens - and Buddha who said he married an under 18. Buddha has long been one of the most popular people on Voat. At least going by 'votes'.
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 2 points 1.2 yearsApr 8, 2024 20:18:37 ago (+2/-0)
Not that you have the highest moral ground, you don't, I know first hand who you're about.
It got out of control here with ALS, Dangus and few others. EVERY MOTHERFUCKING PIECE OF SHIT FUCKIINGN THREAD WAS PEDO THIS PEDO THAT BLAH BLAH BLAH.
So, STFU and don't be starting that shit again.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 0 points 1.2 yearsApr 8, 2024 20:52:23 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 0 points 1.2 yearsApr 9, 2024 02:06:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 1 point 1.2 yearsApr 9, 2024 02:05:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 1 point 1.2 yearsApr 8, 2024 19:33:23 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 1 point 1.2 yearsApr 8, 2024 20:55:08 ago (+1/-0)
It tells me all that I need to know.
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 -1 points 1.2 yearsApr 8, 2024 21:08:29 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 0 points 1.2 yearsApr 9, 2024 02:09:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1.2 yearsApr 8, 2024 20:00:40 ago (+1/-1)
For example, I had a ban thread at ConPro get over 130 upvotes. My ban was briefly reversed. Then ALS got like 60 upvotes in a thread calling me a pedo. Then as I noted recently beece got over 50 upvotes in a thread calling me a cop.
Bear in mind I was not well known at the time at communities.feds.
Here we have 3 upvotes so far for transparent bullshit.
I already know what is going on. But food for thought for those that don't for sure.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -2 points 1.2 yearsApr 8, 2024 17:38:25 ago (+1/-3)*
I like to flush out other FBI accounts. You guys all come to each other's rescue to sustain nonsense.
Years old thread. Don't even remember the specifics of why I deleted it. From the looks of the poll options though it looks like what I was asking was whether pedos on the site were worse or better than assholes calling everyone pedos. It's like characterizing something as 'pro-pedo' because you're asking whether it is worse or better than the most outrageous slanderers you've ever met.
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 3 points 1.2 yearsApr 8, 2024 17:59:42 ago (+3/-0)
Yeah, it just looks like an error, thinking of one thing and typing another.
That’s nice, but you’re shit at it.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 1.2 yearsApr 8, 2024 18:17:33 ago (+1/-2)
And what's amusing is that KHK ends up highlighting the most obnoxious pedo hunter on the internet - theoldones here. So you think jagoffs like theoldones engaging in serial libel MIGHT be worse than the 'pedos' on the site? "Pro-pedophile!"
Has there ever been an actual proponent of pedophilia on Voat? You know, as in advocating sex between adults and pre-pubescents? Maybe. But if there have been they haven't caught much flack for it.
Offhand I can think of two real 'abusers' here. That Aussie conspiracy theorist who said something perhaps dodgy about under tens - and Buddha who said he married an under 18. Buddha has long been one of the most popular people on Voat. At least going by 'votes'.
Maybe you're all pedophiles.