That's not really true. When Thomas Putnam lied during the Salem witch trails did the truth stated by Bridget Bishop that "I am not a witch" defend itself and with it Bridget Bishop. No. The lie prevailed.
I consider it true that the world is better off with a white race being present. So according to you I can just say that once and never touch the issue again and assume everything will work out? Lies prevail all the time, and truth fails to defend itself any time it does. Truth fails to defend itself basically more often than not.
Yeah it seems kind of poetic to say truth will defend itself. But it's also retarded and childish and unfit for the thoughts of men who, given the consequences in the world today, need to face reality in everything they do.
Truisms are the signal of idiots, and our culture should never benefit a man for speaking in truism. By making this adjustment our culture will be more mature than other cultures and be more fit to handle the unique challenges being waged against us from many sides. Truism are a thing of the past. Treat as an idiot anyone who uses them.
Wait, were the founding fathers libtards? "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal."
One, nothing is self evident. That's the equivalent of a leftoid spouting unsupported dogmas and claiming you are not allowed to question it. "I'm just definitionally correct because I made up definitions. I don't need evidence for what I'm climaing. Any evidence you find to the contrary is irrelevant because it will never overcome the self-evidence."
They actually wrote it needlessly in the pattern of leftoids. If they wanted to write what they meant in a non-leftoid way they would have said, "We assert that it is a requisite of morality that all male citizens are granted equal legal standing at birth."
It was intended to take the king down a peg and say, hey, you and I, we're both just people, and you don't have special rights over me. But they injected this retarded self evidence bullshit.
With information. So there was evidence.. not self evidence. I agree that something can be relatively self evident, common sense. But that all men are created equal, when addressing a king who is not going to have that view, you can't just declare whatever you want as self evident. That's a rhetorical approach I would expect out of a gender studies college student.
Just declare the 100% not established thing as established. Sure, why not?
Men referred to anglos, Dutch, nords, and so on. It was self evident that niggers weren't men. The lines only became blurred once niggers had enough European blood and Hollywood presented them as just like us. Pure Africans are much more obviously sub human.
Yeah I'm Canadian I know. We took all the Japanese Canadians and rounded them up and put them in "internment camps" totally not concentration camps because we won the war therefore we get to decide who did the good deeds and who did the bad deeds.
Any war were the White man dies for nothing was not a war worth fighting.
The Japanese were told to move inland, and did. Lethbridge Alberta for instnce. THe ones who refused to move had to be sent to camp and play baseball while White women and children worked in the fields to see that they got fed.
White civilans in Japan wee tortured and killed.
Canadians could have put every rebellious Japanese who refused to do their part for the war effort onto boats and rid themselves of the threat.
[ + ] ProudRebel
[ - ] ProudRebel 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 11:49:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 12:27:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 2 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 13:30:02 ago (+2/-0)*
I consider it true that the world is better off with a white race being present. So according to you I can just say that once and never touch the issue again and assume everything will work out? Lies prevail all the time, and truth fails to defend itself any time it does. Truth fails to defend itself basically more often than not.
Yeah it seems kind of poetic to say truth will defend itself. But it's also retarded and childish and unfit for the thoughts of men who, given the consequences in the world today, need to face reality in everything they do.
Truisms are the signal of idiots, and our culture should never benefit a man for speaking in truism. By making this adjustment our culture will be more mature than other cultures and be more fit to handle the unique challenges being waged against us from many sides. Truism are a thing of the past. Treat as an idiot anyone who uses them.
[ + ] DeusExMachina
[ - ] DeusExMachina 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 13:44:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Stonkmar
[ - ] Stonkmar 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 15:08:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 20:59:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 12:32:03 ago (+1/-1)*
One, nothing is self evident. That's the equivalent of a leftoid spouting unsupported dogmas and claiming you are not allowed to question it. "I'm just definitionally correct because I made up definitions. I don't need evidence for what I'm climaing. Any evidence you find to the contrary is irrelevant because it will never overcome the self-evidence."
They actually wrote it needlessly in the pattern of leftoids. If they wanted to write what they meant in a non-leftoid way they would have said, "We assert that it is a requisite of morality that all male citizens are granted equal legal standing at birth."
It was intended to take the king down a peg and say, hey, you and I, we're both just people, and you don't have special rights over me. But they injected this retarded self evidence bullshit.
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 4 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 14:47:47 ago (+4/-0)
It was a different time, when people were intelligent and could make rational conclusions when presented with information.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 1 yearApr 21, 2024 20:53:17 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 18:33:40 ago (+0/-0)
Just declare the 100% not established thing as established. Sure, why not?
[ + ] olinneserpona
[ - ] olinneserpona 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 15:21:50 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dass
[ - ] dass 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 16:54:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 1 yearApr 22, 2024 00:05:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 14:07:50 ago (+0/-0)
Japan was sadistic when they landed anywhere.
[ + ] GeorgeBailey
[ - ] GeorgeBailey 3 points 1 yearApr 22, 2024 04:35:50 ago (+3/-0)
Pearl harbor was instigated and a set up.
Their "sadistic" characteristics are a reflection of their honor for their country and Emperor.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 1 yearApr 22, 2024 06:20:29 ago (+2/-0)
Japan was at war with Canada and the US
[ + ] GeorgeBailey
[ - ] GeorgeBailey -1 points 1 yearApr 22, 2024 19:51:16 ago (+0/-1)
Any war were the White man dies for nothing was not a war worth fighting.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 1 yearApr 23, 2024 02:38:30 ago (+0/-0)*
White civilans in Japan wee tortured and killed.
Canadians could have put every rebellious Japanese who refused to do their part for the war effort onto boats and rid themselves of the threat.
You need to go home to China.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 2 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 19:01:30 ago (+2/-0)
"How would you feel if you hadn't eaten breakfast this morning?"
Although the percentages are rough, the amount of people without that voice were right around the percent of non-Whites in the country.
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 6 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 22:06:34 ago (+6/-0)
The newest White supremacist dogwhistle, according to the ADL
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 1 yearApr 21, 2024 20:50:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] BoraxTheFungarian
[ - ] BoraxTheFungarian 0 points 1 yearApr 22, 2024 03:04:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 1 yearApr 22, 2024 13:11:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ilikeskittles
[ - ] ilikeskittles -1 points 1 yearApr 23, 2024 10:40:15 ago (+0/-1)