Britain, France, the U.S.S.R., the Netherlands, and even Belgium and the U.S. (with the Philippines) have massive empires covering the world and subjugating millions of foreigners.
But no, Germany was the "evil conqueror" for wanting to unite the Germans of Europe into one state.
[ - ] carnold03 1 point 11 monthsJun 2, 2024 12:35:21 ago (+1/-0)
I doubt they could've conquered the world. Central and western Europe, definitely, but not the whole world, not in one lifetime, and definitely not in one go. While the Germanic people had the range and presence to enable Germany's steady resurgence in the aftermath of the great war, Germanic Europe simply didn't have the population for it. That they got as far as eastern Russia with a highly motivated army equipped primarily with the previous generations arms, mostly late WW1 era equipment, is impressive no matter how you hack it.
I agree. Following Operation Barbarossa, by the time the Wehrmacht reached the outskirts of Moscow, they had encircled and thereby taken prisoner around 3 million men of the Red Army, in just three months; so many casualties so fast would be absolutely debilitating to any other country. They covered a territory in Russia that was twice as big as that of the German Reich in 1939. The feats of the Wehrmacht were, as Hitler stated, insurmountable.
It was only through (((western))) lend-lease and the Soviet order refusing retreat (at a great cost of human life) that the Allies would eventually turn the tide.
"Lend-lease" is a marketing buzzword which kind of shows how retarded American politicians have always been. While the Soviet Union had a vastly larger population to Germany, most of it was concentrated in the westernmost regions of their territory. Siberia, vast as it is, was, and still is, comparatively sparsely populated the further east you travel through the interior.
In simple terms, Germany went to war with late WW1 era equipment not due to that equipment being superior, but rather, because Germany had significantly less industrial capacity and population than its enemies. I suspect that if Fascist Italian leadership had made more forward thinking decisions to deal with their domestic problems while working to partner with Spain and France to mechanize their agricultural and other industries, while selling their surplus to Germany, things could've gone very differently. An effort to establish a confederation of Latin countries geared to making its agricultural and industrial surplus available to Germany might've produced some interesting results. At least, more enduring than Italy's efforts to relive the glory of Rome, in their attempt to reconquer parts of Africa.
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 11 monthsJun 2, 2024 01:50:20 ago (+1/-0)
That doesn't mean anything t modern people with an inferior universal education, but that little blue thing beside Africa at the bottom is Madagascar where the world wanted all jews to go live and leave everyone the Fck alone.
Imagine if it happened and it was illegal for any transportation to go there. and the worlds nations took turns posting navy cruisers to make sure there was no communication between them and the outside world. No talmud, no kabbala, no OT. No electricity or running water infrastructure, If they couldn't make it, they couldn't have it.
[ + ] 15MAR
[ - ] 15MAR [op] 2 points 11 monthsJun 2, 2024 01:27:40 ago (+2/-0)
But no, Germany was the "evil conqueror" for wanting to unite the Germans of Europe into one state.
[ + ] carnold03
[ - ] carnold03 1 point 11 monthsJun 2, 2024 12:35:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 15MAR
[ - ] 15MAR [op] 0 points 11 monthsJun 2, 2024 13:21:32 ago (+0/-0)
I agree. Following Operation Barbarossa, by the time the Wehrmacht reached the outskirts of Moscow, they had encircled and thereby taken prisoner around 3 million men of the Red Army, in just three months; so many casualties so fast would be absolutely debilitating to any other country. They covered a territory in Russia that was twice as big as that of the German Reich in 1939. The feats of the Wehrmacht were, as Hitler stated, insurmountable.
It was only through (((western))) lend-lease and the Soviet order refusing retreat (at a great cost of human life) that the Allies would eventually turn the tide.
[ + ] carnold03
[ - ] carnold03 0 points 11 monthsJun 2, 2024 15:08:31 ago (+0/-0)*
In simple terms, Germany went to war with late WW1 era equipment not due to that equipment being superior, but rather, because Germany had significantly less industrial capacity and population than its enemies. I suspect that if Fascist Italian leadership had made more forward thinking decisions to deal with their domestic problems while working to partner with Spain and France to mechanize their agricultural and other industries, while selling their surplus to Germany, things could've gone very differently. An effort to establish a confederation of Latin countries geared to making its agricultural and industrial surplus available to Germany might've produced some interesting results. At least, more enduring than Italy's efforts to relive the glory of Rome, in their attempt to reconquer parts of Africa.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 11 monthsJun 2, 2024 01:50:20 ago (+1/-0)
Imagine if it happened and it was illegal for any transportation to go there. and the worlds nations took turns posting navy cruisers to make sure there was no communication between them and the outside world. No talmud, no kabbala, no OT. No electricity or running water infrastructure, If they couldn't make it, they couldn't have it.
[ + ] Wahaha
[ - ] Wahaha 0 points 11 monthsJun 2, 2024 12:46:37 ago (+0/-0)